家庭支持型主管行为对员工管家行为的影响 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 丁道韧, 陈万明, 蔡瑞林. 内部人身份认知对员工前摄行为的影响研究——基于心理资本的中介作用与包容型领导的调节作用[J]. 中央财经大学学报,2017, (4): 81-89.

2 董甜甜, 余璇. 谦卑型领导对员工管家行为的影响[J]. 山东社会科学,2019, (4): 134-138.

3 康勇军, 王霄, 彭坚. 组织结构影响管家行为的双路径模型: 观点采择和情感承诺的中介作用[J]. 南开管理评论,2018, (4): 148-157. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2018.04.014

4 乐嘉昂, 彭正龙. 跨层次视角下的职场排斥与员工积极组织行为、团队效能影响机制[J]. 经济管理,2013, (3): 74-84.

5 李海东. 组织中的管家行为研究: 概念结构、影响因素与未来展望[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017, (3): 140-148.

6 刘小禹, 孙健敏, 周禹. 变革/交易型领导对团队创新绩效的权变影响机制——团队情绪氛围的调节作用[J]. 管理学报,2011, (6): 857-864. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2011.06.011

7 刘云, 张文勤. 经理人管家主义行为研究回顾与展望[J]. 华东经济管理,2013, (9): 153-158, 164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5097.2013.09.033

8 卢俊婷, 张喆, 贾明. 公仆型领导与创新行为: 有中介的调节模型[J]. 预测,2017, (6): 9-15.

9 马红宇, 邱慕梦, 唐汉瑛, 等. 家庭支持型主管行为研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2016, (10): 89-101.

10 门一, 樊耘, 马贵梅. 认知—情感要素对员工即兴行为影响机制的研究: 一个跨层分析[J]. 预测,2016, (2): 17-22.

11 施丹, 陶祎祎, 张军伟, 等. 领导—成员交换关系对产业工人敬业度的影响研究[J]. 管理学报,2019, (5): 694-703. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.05.008

12 屠兴勇, 赵紫薇, 王泽英, 等. 情绪智力如何驱动员工角色内绩效? 中介作用的调节效应模型[J]. 管理评论,2018, (7): 173-182.

13 王三银, 刘洪, 刘润刚. 类亲情交换关系视角下家庭支持型主管行为对员工帮助行为的影响研究[J]. 管理学报,2018, (7): 980-987. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2018.07.005

14 吴士健, 李籽儒, 权英. 领导者情绪智力、感知凝聚力与冲突管理风格——基于情绪氛围的调节作用[J]. 软科学,2019, (8): 110-113, 119.

15 Armstrong-Stassen M, Schlosser F. Perceived organizational membership and the retention of older workers[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2011, 32(2): 319-344. DOI:10.1002/job.647

16 Ashkanasy N M, Humphrey R H. Current emotion research in organizational behavior[J]. Emotion Review,2011, 3(2): 214-224. DOI:10.1177/1754073910391684

17 Bagger J, Li A. How does supervisory family support influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective[J]. Journal of Management,2014, 40(4): 1123-1150. DOI:10.1177/0149206311413922

18 Bosch M J, Las Heras M, Russo M, et al. How context matters: The relationship between family supportive supervisor behaviours and motivation to work moderated by gender inequality[J]. Journal of Business Research,2018, 82: 46-55. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.026

19 Choi J, Kim A, Han K, et al. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction with work-family balance: A moderating role of perceived insider status[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2018, 39(1): 1-11. DOI:10.1002/job.2205

20 Crain T L, Stevens S C. Family-supportive supervisor behaviors: A review and recommendations for research and practice[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2018, 39(7): 869-888. DOI:10.1002/job.2320

21 Davis J H, Allen M R, Hayes H D. Is blood thicker than water? A study of stewardship perceptions in family business[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2010, 34(6): 1093-1116. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00415.x

22 Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods,2007, 12(1): 1-22. DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1

23 Gong Y P, Chang S, Cheung S Y. High performance work system and collective OCB: A collective social exchange perspective[J]. Human Resource Management Journal,2010, 20(2): 119-137. DOI:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00123.x

24 Hammer L B, Ernst Kossek E, Bodner T, et al. Measurement development and validation of the family supportive supervisor behavior short-form(FSSB-SF)[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,2013, 18(3): 285-296. DOI:10.1037/a0032612

25 Hammer L B, Kossek E E, Anger W K, et al. Clarifying work-family intervention processes: The roles of work-family conflict and family-supportive supervisor behaviors[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2011, 96(1): 134-150. DOI:10.1037/a0020927

26 Härtel C E J, Liu X Y. How emotional climate in teams affects workplace effectiveness in individualistic and collectivistic contexts[J]. Journal of Management & Organization,2012, 18(4): 573-585.

27 Hernandez M. Toward an understanding of the psychology of stewardship[J]. Academy of Management Review,2012, 37(2): 172-193. DOI:10.5465/amr.2010.0363

28 Hui C, Lee C, Wang H. Organizational inducements and employee citizenship behavior: The mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of collectivism[J]. Human Resource Management,2015, 54(3): 439-456. DOI:10.1002/hrm.21620

29 Klein H J, Molloy J C, Brinsfield C T. Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds[J]. Academy of Management Review,2012, 37(1): 130-151.

30 Knapp J R, Smith B R, Sprinkle T A. Clarifying the relational ties of organizational belonging: Understanding the roles of perceived insider status, psychological ownership, and organizational identification[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,2014, 21(3): 273-285.

31 Kuppelwieser V G. Stewardship behavior and creativity[J]. Management Revue,2011, 22(3): 274-295. DOI:10.5771/0935-9915-2011-3-274

32 Liu X Y, Härtel C E J. Workgroup emotional exchanges and team performance in China[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,2013, 51(4): 471-490.

33 Liu X Y, Härtel C E J, Sun J J M. The workgroup emotional climate scale: Theoretical development, empirical validation, and relationship with workgroup effectiveness[J]. Group & Organization Management,2014, 39(6): 626-663.

34 Liu X Y, Wang Z. Positive affect and cognitive control: Approach-motivation intensity influences the balance between cognitive flexibility and stability[J]. Psychological Science,2014, 25(5): 1116-1123. DOI:10.1177/0956797614525213

35 Matthews R A, Mills M J, Trout R C, et al. Family-supportive supervisor behaviors, work engagement, and subjective well-being: A contextually dependent mediated process[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,2014, 19(2): 168-181. DOI:10.1037/a0036012

36 Meneghel I, Salanova M, Martínez I M. Feeling good makes us stronger: How team resilience mediates the effect of positive emotions on team performance[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies,2016, 17(1): 239-255. DOI:10.1007/s10902-014-9592-6

37 Mills M J, Matthews R A, Henning J B, et al. Family-supportive organizations and supervisors: How do they influence employee outcomes and for whom?[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,2014, 25(12): 1763-1785. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2013.860387

38 Pan S Y. Do workaholic hotel supervisors provide family supportive supervision? A role identity perspective[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management,2018, 68: 59-67. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.09.013

39 Parker S K, Bindl U K, Strauss K. Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation[J]. Journal of Management,2010, 36(4): 827-856. DOI:10.1177/0149206310363732

40 Preacher K J, Rucker D D, Hayes A F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research,2007, 42(1): 185-227. DOI:10.1080/00273170701341316

41 Russo M, Buonocore F, Carmeli A, et al. When family supportive supervisors meet employees’ need for caring: Implications for work-family enrichment and thriving[J]. Journal of Management,2018, 44(4): 1678-1702. DOI:10.1177/0149206315618013

42 Stamper C L, Masterson S S. Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2002, 23(8): 875-894. DOI:10.1002/job.175

43 Wang H L, Feng J M, Prevellie P, et al. Why do I contribute when I am an “insider”? A moderated mediation approach to perceived insider status and employee’s innovative behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management,2017, 30(7): 1184-1197. DOI:10.1108/JOCM-06-2016-0109

44 Wang P, Walumbwa F O, Wang H, et al. Unraveling the relationship between family-supportive supervisor and employee performance[J]. Group & Organization Management,2013, 38(2): 258-287.

45 Zhang S X, Tu Y D. Cross-domain effects of ethical leadership on employee family and life satisfaction: The moderating role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2018, 152(4): 1085-1097. DOI:10.1007/s10551-016-3306-4