1411 
1141组织美学从美学角度体验和解读组织生活，关注组织中的物质和物质实践如何通过激发个体的感官反应来产生知识。以往的管理学研究以理性主义范式为主导，重点关注组织实用性的角度，忽视了个体对组织物质环境的情感和认知反应。近年来，越来越多学者从美学角度讨论物质引发的心理感受及其对组织行为的影响。本文通过追踪组织美学的理论和实证文献，对该领域的发展过程和主要研究对象进行了总结梳理，发现大部分研究聚焦于以下四类研究对象：（1）空间实践；（2）个性化物件与符号展示；（3）服饰管理；（4）工作工具与产品使用。其次，本文根据美学原理中主体的审美体验过程构建了系统的研究框架，探究组织美学中的“动力机制—反应机制—作用结果”，并进一步分析了组织美学的研究方法。最后，本文展望了如何从新理论、新情境和新方法的角度更深入地研究组织美学，呼吁理论界和实践界关注组织美学的重要价值，构建美好和谐的组织生态环境，借以推动组织的可持续发展。
组织美学：概念范畴、研究框架与未来展望
摘要
参考文献
1 何云, 李枭, 林晶晶, 等. 品牌美学中的视觉元素研究综述与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(8): 121-137. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20220513.301
2 蒋孔阳. 美学新论[M]. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1993.
3 蒋孔阳. 美在创造中[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 1997.
4 刘擎. 刘擎西方现代思想讲义[M]. 北京: 新星出版社, 2021.
5 尼尔·波斯曼著, 何道宽译. 技术垄断: 文化向技术投降[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2019.
6 叶朗. 美学原理[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009.
7 张洪兴. 组织美学论纲[M]. 北京: 旅游教育出版社, 2014.
8 朱立元. 美学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2019.
9 左亚文. 马克思关于人的本质定义与人的本质的多维性[J]. 马克思主义哲学研究, 2007, (1): 136-143. DOI:10.16762/b.cnki.mkszyzxyj.2007.00.048
10 Alvesson M, Robertson M. The best and the brightest: The construction, significance and effects of elite identities in consulting firms[J]. Organization, 2006, 13(2): 195-224. DOI:10.1177/1350508406061674
11 Baer M D, Van Der Werff L, Colquitt J A, et al. Trusting the “Look and Feel”: Situational normality, situational aesthetics, and the perceived trustworthiness of organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(5): 1718-1740. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0248
12 Baldessarelli G, Stigliani I, Elsbach K D. The Aesthetic dimension of organizing: A review and research agenda[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2022, 16(1): 217-257. DOI:10.5465/annals.2020.0198
13 Bechky B A. Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2003, 109(3): 720-752. DOI:10.1086/379527
14 Belk R W. Possessions and the extended self[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988, 15(2): 139-168. DOI:10.1086/209154
15 Bell E, Davison J. Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2013, 15(2): 167-184. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00342.x
16 Berg O, Kreiner K. Corporate architecture: Turning physical settings into symbolic resources[A]. Gagliardi P. Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape[M]. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.
17 Bernstein E S. The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2012, 57(2): 181-216. DOI:10.1177/0001839212453028
18 Bhat S, Reddy S K. Symbolic and functional positioning of brands[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1998, 15(1): 32-43. DOI:10.1108/07363769810202664
19 Brown G, Lawrence T B, Robinson S L. Territoriality in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(3): 577-594. DOI:10.5465/amr.2005.17293710
20 Brown T J, Dacin P A, Pratt M G, et al. Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2006, 34(2): 99-106. DOI:10.1177/0092070305284969
21 Byron K, Laurence G A. Diplomas, photos, and Tchotchkes as symbolic self-representations: Understanding employees’ individual use of symbols[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(1): 298-323. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0932
22 Clarke J. Revitalizing entrepreneurship: How visual symbols are used in entrepreneurial performances[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(6): 1365-1391. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01002.x
23 Czarniawska B. On time, space, and action nets[J]. Organization, 2004, 11(6): 773-791. DOI:10.1177/1350508404047251
24 Dale K. Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control[J]. Organization, 2005, 12(5): 649-678. DOI:10.1177/1350508405055940
25 De Vaujany F X, Vaast E. If these walls could talk: The mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy[J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25(3): 713-731. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2013.0858
26 Dubois D, Anik L. From style to status and to power: When and why do stylistic choices in footwear make women feel and act powerful?[A]. Cattani G, Ferriani S, Gordart F, et al. Aesthetics and style in strategy[M]. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 2020.
27 Eisenman M. Understanding aesthetic innovation in the context of technological evolution[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2013, 38(3): 332-351. DOI:10.5465/amr.2011.0262
28 Elsbach K D. Relating physical environment to self-categorizations: Identity threat and affirmation in a non-territorial office space[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(4): 622-654. DOI:10.2307/3556639
29 Elsbach K D. Interpreting workplace identities: The role of office décor[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(1): 99-128. DOI:10.1002/job.233
30 Elsbach K D, Barr P S, Hargadon A B. Identifying situated cognition in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(4): 422-433. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1050.0138
31 Elsbach K D, Bechky B A. It’s more than a desk: Working smarter through leveraged office design[J]. California Management Review, 2007, 49(2): 80-101. DOI:10.2307/41166384
32 Elsbach K D, Pratt M G. The physical environment in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2007, 1(1): 181-224. DOI:10.5465/078559809
33 Evans J S B T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 59: 255-278. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
34 Ewenstein B, Whyte J. Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations[J]. Organization Studies, 2007, 28(5): 689-708. DOI:10.1177/0170840607078080
35 Gagliardi P. Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life[A]. Clegg S R, Hardy C, Nord W R. The handbook of organization studies[M]. London: Sage, 1996.
36 Gonsalves L. From face time to flex time: The role of physical space in worker temporal flexibility[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2020, 65(4): 1058-1091. DOI:10.1177/0001839220907891
37 Humphreys M, Brown A D. Dress and identity: A Turkish case study[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2002, 39(7): 927-952. DOI:10.1111/1467-6486.00318
38 Keeler K R, Cortina J M. Working to the beat: A self-regulatory framework linking music characteristics to job performance[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2020, 45(2): 447-471. DOI:10.5465/amr.2016.0115
39 Kellogg K C. Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2009, 115(3): 657-711. DOI:10.1086/603535
40 Khazanchi S, Sprinkle T A, Masterson S S, et al. A spatial model of work relationships: The relationship-building and relationship-straining effects of workspace design[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2018, 43(4): 590-609. DOI:10.5465/amr.2016.0240
41 Kim J K, Holtz B C, Vogel R M. Wearing your worth at work: The consequences of employees’ daily clothing choices[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2022,doi: 10.5465/amj.2021.1358.
42 Klotz A C, Bolino M C. Bringing the great outdoors into the workplace: The energizing effect of biophilic work design[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46(2): 231-251. DOI:10.5465/amr.2017.0177
43 Knorr-Cetina K. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981.
44 Kuhn J W. The misfit between organization theory and processional art: A comment on White and Strati[J]. Organization, 1996, 3(2): 219-224. DOI:10.1177/135050849632005
45 Latour B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
46 Lefebvre H. The production of space[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
47 Lindenberg S, Foss N J. Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(3): 500-525.
48 Manning R E. A place for emotion: How space structures nurse-parent interactions in West African pediatric wards[C]//Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor: Academy of Management, 2014.
49 Massa F G, Helms W S, Voronov M, et al. Emotions uncorked: Inspiring evangelism for the emerging practice of cool-climate winemaking in Ontario[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(2): 461-499. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0092
50 McElroy J C, Morrow P C. Employee reactions to office redesign: A naturally occurring quasi-field experiment in a multi-generational setting[J]. Human Relations, 2010, 63(5): 609-636. DOI:10.1177/0018726709342932
51 Meyer R E, Höllerer M A, Jancsary D, et al. The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2013, 7(1): 489-555. DOI:10.5465/19416520.2013.781867
52 Ocasio W. Attention to attention[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(5): 1286-1296. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0602
53 Pratt M G, Rafaeli A. Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40(4): 862-898. DOI:10.2307/256951
54 Pratt M G, Rafaeli A. Symbols as a language of organizational relationships[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2001, 23: 93-132. DOI:10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23004-4
55 Preston A M, Wright C, Young J J. Imag[in]ing annual reports[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1996, 21(1): 113-137. DOI:10.1016/0361-3682(95)00032-5
56 Rafaeli A, Pratt M G. Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1993, 18(1): 32-55. DOI:10.2307/258822
57 Rafaeli A, Sagy Y, Derfler-Rozin R. Logos and initial compliance: A strong case of mindless trust[J]. Organization Science, 2008, 19(6): 845-859. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0344
58 Rafaeli A, Vilnai-Yavetz I. Emotion as a connection of physical artifacts and organizations[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(6): 671-686. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1040.0083
59 Roberts P W, Dowling G R. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(12): 1077-1093. DOI:10.1002/smj.274
60 Rodner V, Roulet T J, Kerrigan F, et al. Making space for art: A spatial perspective of disruptive and defensive institutional work in Venezuela’s art world[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2020, 63(4): 1054-1081. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.1030
61 Schnackenberg A K, Bundy J, Coen C A, et al. Capitalizing on categories of social construction: A review and integration of organizational research on symbolic management strategies[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2019, 13(2): 375-413. DOI:10.5465/annals.2017.0096
62 Sgourev S V, Aadland E, Formilan G. Relations in aesthetic space: How color enables market positioning[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2023, 68(1): 146-185. DOI:10.1177/00018392221137289
63 Siebert S. Symbolic demarcation: The role of status symbols in preserving interprofessional boundaries[J]. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2020, 7(1): 47-69. DOI:10.1093/jpo/joaa004
64 Siebert S, Wilson F, Hamilton J R A. “Devils may sit here: ” The role of enchantment in institutional maintenance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(4): 1607-1632. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0487
65 Smith R W, Chandler J J, Schwarz N. Uniformity: The effects of organizational attire on judgments and attributions[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2020, 50(5): 299-312. DOI:10.1111/jasp.12660
66 Sofer C, Dotsch R, Wigboldus D H J, et al. What is typical is good: The influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness[J]. Psychological Science, 2015, 26(1): 39-47. DOI:10.1177/0956797614554955
67 Spreitzer G, Bacevice P, Garrett L. Workplace design, the physical environment, and human thriving at work[A]. Ayoko O B, Ashkanasy N M. Organizational behaviour and the physical environment[M]. London: Routledge, 2019.
68 Stigliani I, Ravasi D. The shaping of form: Exploring designers’ use of aesthetic knowledge[J]. Organization Studies, 2018, 39(5-6): 747-784. DOI:10.1177/0170840618759813
69 Strati A. Aesthetic understanding of organizational life[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3): 568-581. DOI:10.2307/258723
70 Strati A. Organizations viewed through the lens of aesthetics[J]. Organization, 1996, 3(2): 209-218. DOI:10.1177/135050849632004
71 Strati A. Organization and aesthetics[M]. London: SAGE, 1999.
72 Strati A. Aesthetic understanding of work and organizational life: Approaches and research developments[J]. Sociology Compass, 2010, 4(10): 880-893. DOI:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00323.x
73 Sundstrom E, Sundstrom M G. Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
74 Taylor S S, Hansen H. Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, 42(6): 1211-1231. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00539.x
75 Warren S. Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: Towards a sensual methodology[J]. Organization Studies, 2008, 29(4): 559-580. DOI:10.1177/0170840607083104
76 Wasserman V, Frenkel M. Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(2): 503-521. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0583
77 Weick K E, Sutcliffe K M, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of sensemaking[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16(4): 409-421. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
78 Weinfurtner T, Seidl D. Towards a spatial perspective: An integrative review of research on organisational space[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2019, 35(2): 101009. DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2018.02.003
79 Wells M, Thelen L. What does your workspace say about you?: The influence of personality, status, and workspace on personalization[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2002, 34(3): 300-321. DOI:10.1177/0013916502034003002
80 Wilson J P, Rule N O. Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal-sentencing outcomes[J]. Psychological Science, 2015, 26(8): 1325-1331. DOI:10.1177/0956797615590992
81 Witz A, Warhurst C, Nickson D. The labour of aesthetics and the aesthetics of organization[J]. Organization, 2003, 10(1): 33-54. DOI:10.1177/1350508403010001375
82 Zott C, Huy Q N. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2007, 52(1): 70-105. DOI:10.2189/asqu.52.1.70
83 Zuzul T W. “Matter battles”: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2019, 62(3): 739-764. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0625
引用本文
张熠婕, 贾良定. 组织美学：概念范畴、研究框架与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(8): 18-35.
导出参考文献，格式为：
