传统的公司治理研究建立在委托代理理论的经济人假设上,但治理主客体所嵌入的社会网络同样会对其自身决策行为施加影响。相较于以经济属性为中心的代理理论,关注行动者社会属性的社会网络理论为公司治理研究开辟了新的方向。基于内外治理机制的划分和现有研究的积累,本文首先对公司治理中存在的董事网络、投资者网络和利益相关者网络三种社会网络类型进行讨论,论述了社会网络构建的外部制度背景动因和内部资源依赖动因,并对网络的概念类型和联结多样性进行界定。其次,针对性地检索了国内外现有文献,运用CiteSpace进行科学计量分析和热点挖掘,发现相较于国外研究进展,我国公司治理中的社会网络研究还有较大的拓展空间。最后,在总结和比较现有研究成果的基础上,指出现有研究在思路、方法、内容等方面的趋势变化,为社会网络治理机制的未来研究提供建议和帮助。
公司治理中的社会网络研究--基于科学计量学的中外文献比较
摘要
参考文献
28 Bizjak J, Lemmon M, Whitby R. Option backdating and board interlocks[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(11):4821-4847. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhn120
29 Brown J L. The spread of aggressive corporate tax reporting:A detailed examination of the corporate-owned life insurance shelter[J]. The Accounting Review, 2011, 86(1):23-57. DOI:10.2308/accr.00000008
30 Burt R S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2):349-399. DOI:10.1086/421787
31 Butler A W, Gurun U G. Educational networks, mutual fund voting patterns, and CEO compensation[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2012, 25(8):2533-2562. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhs067
32 Chiu P C, Teoh S H, Tian F. Board interlocks and earnings management contagion[J]. The Accounting Review, 2013, 88(3):915-944. DOI:10.2308/accr-50369
33 Chua V, Wellman B. Social networks in east and southeast Asia I:National characteristics, institutions, network capital, andGuanxi[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 2015, 59(8):903-913. DOI:10.1177/0002764215580585
34 Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C. Sell-side school ties[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(4):1409-1437. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01574.x
35 Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C. The small world of investing:Board connections and mutual fund returns[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2008, 116(5):951-979. DOI:10.1086/592415
36 Cots E G. Stakeholder social capital:A new approach to stakeholder theory[J]. Business Ethics:A European Review, 2011, 20(4):328-341. DOI:10.1111/beer.2011.20.issue-4
37 Davis G F, Greve H R. Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1997, 103(1):1-37. DOI:10.1086/231170
38 Davis G F, Yoo M, Baker W E. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982-2001[J]. Strategic Organization, 2003, 1(3):301-326. DOI:10.1177/14761270030013002
39 Fan J P H, Wong T J, Zhang T Y. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 84(2):330-357. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.008
40 Ferris S P, Jagannathan M, Pritchard A C. Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2003, 58(3):1087-1111. DOI:10.1111/1540-6261.00559
41 Fich E M, Shivdasani A. Are busy boards effective monitors?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(2):689-724. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00852.x
42 Fracassi C, Tate G. External networking and internal firm governance[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2012, 67(1):153-194. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01706.x
43 Freeman R E. Strategic management:A stakeholder approach[M]. Boston:Pitman Publishing Inc., 1984.
44 Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure:The problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3):481-510. DOI:10.1086/228311
45 Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A. Strategic networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3):203-215. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
46 Hochberg Y V, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y. Whom you know matters:Venture capital networks and investment performance[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(1):251-301. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01207.x
47 Hong H, Kubik J D, Stein J C. Thy neighbor's portfolio:Word-of-mouth effects in the holdings and trades of money managers[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(6):2801-2824. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00817.x
48 Hwang B H, Kim S. It pays to have friends[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 93(1):138-158. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.07.005
50 Keister L A. Exchange structures in transition:Lending and trade relations in Chinese business groups[J]. American Sociological Review, 2001, 66(3):336-360. DOI:10.2307/3088883
52 Kuhnen C M. Business networks, corporate governance, and contracting in the mutual fund industry[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2009, 64(5):2185-2220. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01498.x
53 Matten D, Moon J. "Implicit" and "explicit" CSR:A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2008, 33(2):404-424. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
54 McMillan J, Woodruff C. Interfirm relationships and informal credit in Vietnam[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114(4):1285-1320. DOI:10.1162/003355399556278
55 McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather:Homophily in social networks[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27:415-444. DOI:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
56 Pool V K, Stoffman N, Yonker S E. The people in your neighborhood:Social interactions and mutual fund portfolios[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(6):2679-2732. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12208
57 Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation:Networks of learning in biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1):116-145. DOI:10.2307/2393988
58 Reppenhagen D A. Contagion of accounting methods:Evidence from stock option expensing[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2010, 15(3):629-657. DOI:10.1007/s11142-010-9128-1
59 Roloff J. Learning from multi-stakeholder networks:Issue-focussed stakeholder management[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 82(1):233-250. DOI:10.1007/s10551-007-9573-3
61 Roy W G, Bonacich P. Interlocking directorates and communities of interest among American railroad companies, 1905[J]. American Sociological Review, 1988, 53(3):368-379. DOI:10.2307/2095645
62 Scherer A G, Palazzo G. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility:Business and society seen from a habermasianperspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4):1096-1120. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.26585837
63 Shue K. Executive networks and firm policies:Evidence from the random assignment of MBA peers[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2013, 26(6):1401-1442. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hht019
64 Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:The paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(1):35-67. DOI:10.2307/2393808
65 Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:The network effect[J]. American Sociological Review, 1996, 61(4):674-698. DOI:10.2307/2096399
66 Westphal J D, Stern I. Flattery will get you everywhere (especially if you are a male Caucasian):How ingratiation, boardroom behavior, and demographic minority status affect additional board appointments at U. S. companies[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(2):267-288. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634434
67 Westphal J D, Stern I. The other pathway to the boardroom:Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2006, 51(2):169-204. DOI:10.2189/asqu.51.2.169
68 Westphal J D, Zajac E J. A behavioral theory of corporate governance:Explicating the mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2013, 7(1):607-661. DOI:10.1080/19416520.2013.783669
69 Xin K K, Pearce J L. Guanxi:Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(6):1641-1658. DOI:10.2307/257072
引用本文
李维安, 齐鲁骏. 公司治理中的社会网络研究--基于科学计量学的中外文献比较[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(1): 68–83.
导出参考文献,格式为:
上一篇:信息化人力资源管理研究进展探析