当代国外发展研究主要学术争论解析与研究展望
5363 
249
外国经济与管理 2013 年 第 35 卷第 06 期, 页码：2 - 12
摘要
参考文献
摘要
如同"发展"是一个在理论和政治上富有争议的概念一样,"发展研究"亦是一个充满学术争论的研究领域,"发展研究"的发展史堪称一部"学术争论史"。因此,厘清相关的学术争论,显然是准确把握当代国外发展研究现状与发展趋势的基本前提。本文主要对发展研究的本质特征、学科属性、学术伦理、研究范式、学术前景等五方面的学术争论进行了系统分析,并从内因和外因两方面探讨了争论的可能动因,最后基于争论中可进一步探讨的学术空间,有针对性地对未来研究进行了展望。
②“区域研究”与“发展研究”确有某些共同点,如都运用交叉学科方法,都集中关注发展中国家的相关议题。但区别也非常显著,主要体现在三个方面:第一,区域研究注重语言、文化和历史研究,而发展研究则重点关注“发展”议题。第二,区域研究侧重于特定国家和全球不同地区的研究,不看重国际比较研究和国家与地区之间的相关关系;发展研究也关注国际发展,但并不仅仅专注于特定的国家或地区。另外,同区域研究相比,发展研究更具政策相关性和工具性的特点。第三,虽然发展研究的理论建构对本体论、认识论和方法论立场还缺乏较为精细的考虑,理论建构尚存在明显缺陷,但与区域研究相比,发展研究的理论建构仍略胜一筹。参见Martinussen J.Society,State and Market:A Guide to Competing Theories of Development.London:Zed Books,1997:346。
[1]Albrow M.Globalization after modernization:A new paradigm for development studies[A].Schuurman F J(Ed.).Globaliza-tion and development studies:Challenges for the21st century[C].London:Sage,2001.
[2]Apthorpe R.Development studies and policy studies:In the short run we are all dead[J].Journal of International Develop-ment,1999,11(4):535-546.
[3]Brown N,et al.Social science research ethics in developing countries and contexts[R].ESRC Research Ethics Frame-work,Discussion Paper3,Brookes University,2004.
[4]Canning J.Disciplinarity:A barrier to quality assurance?The UK experience of area studies[J].Quality in Higher Educa-tion,2005,11(1):37-46.
[5]Corbridge S.Queuing,complaining and photocopying:Notes on the(im)possibility of development studies[R].Paper Pre-sented at the Development Studies Association Annual Con-ference,Milton Keynes,UK,Available at www.devstud.org.uk,2005.
[6]Court J and Maxwell S.Policy entrepreneurship for poverty re-duction:Bridging research and policy in international develo-pment[J].Journal of International Development,2005,17(6):713-725.
[7]DARG(Developing Areas Research Group).DARG ethical guidelines[EB/OL].www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/DARG/ethical.htm,2003.
[8]David M and Sutton C.Social research:The basics[M].Lon-don:Sage,2004.
[9]Edwards M.The irrelevance of development studies[J].Third World Quarterly,1989,11(1):116-135.
[10]Escobar A.Encountering development:The making and un-making of the third world[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton Uni-versity Press,1995.
[11]Ferguson J.The anti-politics machine:“Development”,depo-liticization,and bureaucratic power in Lesotho[M].Cam-bridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1990.
[12]Fine B.Economics imperialism and the new development eco-nomics as Kuhnian paradigm shift?[J].World Development,2002,30(12):2057-2070.
[13]Frobel F and Heinrichs J.The new international division of labor[M].Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1980.
[14]Harriss J.Great promise,hubris and recovery:A participants history of development studies[A].Kothari U(Ed.).A radical history of development studies[C].London:Zed Books,2005.
[15]Haynes J.Development studies[M].Cambridge,UK:Polity Press,2008.
[16]Hobart M,et al.An anthropological critique of development:The growth of ignorance[M].London:Routledge,1993.
[17]Hulme D and Toye J.The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty inequality and wellbeing[J].Jour-nal of Development Studies,2006,42(7):1085-1107.
[18]Kanbur R.Economics,social science and development[J].World Development,2002,30(12):477-486.
[19]Kothari U.A radical history of development studies:Indivi-duals,institutions and ideologies[A].Kothari U(Ed.).A radical history of development studies[C].London:Zed Books,2005.
[20]Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions[M].Chica-go:University of Chicago Press,1962.
[21]Long N and Long A.Battlefield of knowledge:The interloc-king of theory and practice in social research and development[M].London:Routledge,1992.
[22]Long N.Development sociology:Actor perspectives[M].London and New York:Routledge,2001.
[23]Losee R M.A discipline independent definition of information[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1997,48(3):254-269.
[24]Mehta L,et al.Reinventing development research[J].Forum for Development Studies,2006,33(1):1-6.
[25]Mohan G.Developing differences:Post-structuralism&po-litical economy in contemporary development studies[J].Re-view of African Political Economy,1997,24(3):311-328.
[26]Molteberg E and Bergstrom C.Our common discourse:Diver-sity and paradigms in development studies[R].Norway:NOR-AGRIC,2000.
[27]Ohmae K.A borderless world[M].Tokyo:Kodansha,1990.
[28]Preston P W.Development theory:An introduction[M].Ox-ford:Blackwell,1996.
[29]Robertson R.Globalization:Social theory and global order[M].London:Sage,1992.
[30]Sachs W.The development dictionary:A guide to knowledge as power[M].London and New York:Zed Books,1992.
[31]Summer A and Tribe M.International development studies:Theories and methods in research and practice[M].Los An-geles,London,New Delhi,Singapore:Sage,2008.
[32]Sumner A.What is development studies?[J].Development in Practice,2006,17(6):644-650.
[33]Sumner A.The ethics of development research[J].IDS Bul-letin,2007,38(2):59-68.
[34]Thomas A.The study of development[R].Paper prepared for DSA Annual Conference,6November,Church House,London,2004.
[35]Wallerstein I.Development:Lodestar or illusion?[A].Wallerstein I(Ed.).Unthinking social science:The limits of nineteenth-century paradigms[C].Philadelphia:Temple Uni-versity Press,1991.
[36](美)阿图罗.埃斯柯瓦尔.发展的历史,现代性的困境——以批判性的发展研究视角审视全球化[J].中国农业大学学报,2008,(1):7-24.
[37](英)彼得.华莱士.普雷斯顿.发展理论导论[M].(李小云等译).北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[38](英)凯蒂.加德纳,大卫.刘易斯.人类学、发展与后现代挑战[M].(张有春译).北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[1]Albrow M.Globalization after modernization:A new paradigm for development studies[A].Schuurman F J(Ed.).Globaliza-tion and development studies:Challenges for the21st century[C].London:Sage,2001.
[2]Apthorpe R.Development studies and policy studies:In the short run we are all dead[J].Journal of International Develop-ment,1999,11(4):535-546.
[3]Brown N,et al.Social science research ethics in developing countries and contexts[R].ESRC Research Ethics Frame-work,Discussion Paper3,Brookes University,2004.
[4]Canning J.Disciplinarity:A barrier to quality assurance?The UK experience of area studies[J].Quality in Higher Educa-tion,2005,11(1):37-46.
[5]Corbridge S.Queuing,complaining and photocopying:Notes on the(im)possibility of development studies[R].Paper Pre-sented at the Development Studies Association Annual Con-ference,Milton Keynes,UK,Available at www.devstud.org.uk,2005.
[6]Court J and Maxwell S.Policy entrepreneurship for poverty re-duction:Bridging research and policy in international develo-pment[J].Journal of International Development,2005,17(6):713-725.
[7]DARG(Developing Areas Research Group).DARG ethical guidelines[EB/OL].www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/DARG/ethical.htm,2003.
[8]David M and Sutton C.Social research:The basics[M].Lon-don:Sage,2004.
[9]Edwards M.The irrelevance of development studies[J].Third World Quarterly,1989,11(1):116-135.
[10]Escobar A.Encountering development:The making and un-making of the third world[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton Uni-versity Press,1995.
[11]Ferguson J.The anti-politics machine:“Development”,depo-liticization,and bureaucratic power in Lesotho[M].Cam-bridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1990.
[12]Fine B.Economics imperialism and the new development eco-nomics as Kuhnian paradigm shift?[J].World Development,2002,30(12):2057-2070.
[13]Frobel F and Heinrichs J.The new international division of labor[M].Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,1980.
[14]Harriss J.Great promise,hubris and recovery:A participants history of development studies[A].Kothari U(Ed.).A radical history of development studies[C].London:Zed Books,2005.
[15]Haynes J.Development studies[M].Cambridge,UK:Polity Press,2008.
[16]Hobart M,et al.An anthropological critique of development:The growth of ignorance[M].London:Routledge,1993.
[17]Hulme D and Toye J.The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty inequality and wellbeing[J].Jour-nal of Development Studies,2006,42(7):1085-1107.
[18]Kanbur R.Economics,social science and development[J].World Development,2002,30(12):477-486.
[19]Kothari U.A radical history of development studies:Indivi-duals,institutions and ideologies[A].Kothari U(Ed.).A radical history of development studies[C].London:Zed Books,2005.
[20]Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions[M].Chica-go:University of Chicago Press,1962.
[21]Long N and Long A.Battlefield of knowledge:The interloc-king of theory and practice in social research and development[M].London:Routledge,1992.
[22]Long N.Development sociology:Actor perspectives[M].London and New York:Routledge,2001.
[23]Losee R M.A discipline independent definition of information[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1997,48(3):254-269.
[24]Mehta L,et al.Reinventing development research[J].Forum for Development Studies,2006,33(1):1-6.
[25]Mohan G.Developing differences:Post-structuralism&po-litical economy in contemporary development studies[J].Re-view of African Political Economy,1997,24(3):311-328.
[26]Molteberg E and Bergstrom C.Our common discourse:Diver-sity and paradigms in development studies[R].Norway:NOR-AGRIC,2000.
[27]Ohmae K.A borderless world[M].Tokyo:Kodansha,1990.
[28]Preston P W.Development theory:An introduction[M].Ox-ford:Blackwell,1996.
[29]Robertson R.Globalization:Social theory and global order[M].London:Sage,1992.
[30]Sachs W.The development dictionary:A guide to knowledge as power[M].London and New York:Zed Books,1992.
[31]Summer A and Tribe M.International development studies:Theories and methods in research and practice[M].Los An-geles,London,New Delhi,Singapore:Sage,2008.
[32]Sumner A.What is development studies?[J].Development in Practice,2006,17(6):644-650.
[33]Sumner A.The ethics of development research[J].IDS Bul-letin,2007,38(2):59-68.
[34]Thomas A.The study of development[R].Paper prepared for DSA Annual Conference,6November,Church House,London,2004.
[35]Wallerstein I.Development:Lodestar or illusion?[A].Wallerstein I(Ed.).Unthinking social science:The limits of nineteenth-century paradigms[C].Philadelphia:Temple Uni-versity Press,1991.
[36](美)阿图罗.埃斯柯瓦尔.发展的历史,现代性的困境——以批判性的发展研究视角审视全球化[J].中国农业大学学报,2008,(1):7-24.
[37](英)彼得.华莱士.普雷斯顿.发展理论导论[M].(李小云等译).北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[38](英)凯蒂.加德纳,大卫.刘易斯.人类学、发展与后现代挑战[M].(张有春译).北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
引用本文
方劲. 当代国外发展研究主要学术争论解析与研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2013, 35(6): 2–12.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：上海财经大学中青年学者
