6568 
7419本文关注新组织形式形成问题，通过回顾50年来的主要相关文献，力图加强各研究路向之间的对话和整合，推动未来研究的深入。现有文献对组织形式概念的理解可归为三种，即组织活动所呈现的模式、由制度逻辑塑造的组织样板、社会观众赋予组织群体的集体身份，也是研究新组织形式形成问题的三种视角。新组织形式形成过程涉及产生和确立两个不同的内在阶段，三种视角对此各有不同阐释，但存在基本共识：产生阶段的关键是组合多种组织要素，确立阶段的关键是获取合法性。我们整合三种视角，指出模式、样板、身份是组织形式的三种共存面相，也是新组织形式形成过程的三种历时状态，在产生—确立期间，依次上升成为主要形象；制度逻辑是三面相的共同基础，也是贯穿三状态的构成性力量。进一步，我们提出拼合可作为新视角，融合现有研究的三视角，且有望深化和推进当前研究。本文在一定程度上加强了各理论流派之间的交流，奠定了后续经验研究的基础。
新组织形式如何形成？——对50年研究的回顾与整合
摘要
参考文献
1 Abatecola G. Research in organizational evolution. What comes next?[J] European Management Journal, 2014, 32（3）: 434–443. DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2013.07.008
2 Alexy O, George G. Category divergence, Sraddling, and currency: Open innovation and the legitimation of illegitimate categories[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2013, 50（2）: 173–203. DOI:10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-2
3 Altglas V. " Bricolage”: Reclaiming a conceptual tool[J]. Culture and Religion, 2014, 15（4）: 474–493. DOI:10.1080/14755610.2014.984235
4 Astley W G. The two ecologies: Population and community perspectives on organizational evolution[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1985, 30（2）: 224–241. DOI:10.2307/2393106
5 Baker T, Nelson R E. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50（3）: 329–366. DOI:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
6 Battilana J, Dorado S. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53（6）: 1419–1440. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318391
7 Battilana J, Lee M. Advancing research on hybrid organizing–insights from the study of social enterprises[J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2014, 8（1）: 397–441. DOI:10.1080/19416520.2014.893615
8 Bogaert S, Boone C, Negro G, et al. Organizational form emergence: A meta-analysis of the ecological theory of legitimation[J]. Journal of Management, 2016, 42（5）: 1344–1373. DOI:10.1177/0149206314527129
9 Greenwood R, Hinings C R. Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36（5）: 1052–1081. DOI:10.2307/256645
10 Greenwood R, Hinings C R. Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1993: 21（4）: 1022–1054.
11 Greenwood R, Suddaby R. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49（1）: 27–48. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785498
12 Greif A. Family structure, institutions, and growth: The origins and implications of western corporations[J]. American Economic Review, 2006, 96（2）: 308–312. DOI:10.1257/000282806777212602
13 Jha H K, Beckman C M. A patchwork of identities: emergence of charter schools as a new organizational form[A]. Seidel M D L, Greve H R, Eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations[C]. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017: 69–107.
14 Kieser A. Organizational, institutional, and societal evolution: Medieval craft guilds and the genesis of formal organizations[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34（4）: 540–564. DOI:10.2307/2393566
15 Lee K, Pennings J M. Mimicry and the market: Adoption of a new organizational form[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45（1）: 144–162. DOI:10.2307/3069289
16 McKelvey B, Aldrich H. Populations, natural selection, and applied organizational science[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28（1）: 101–128. DOI:10.2307/2392389
17 McKendrick D G, Jaffee J, Carroll G R, et al. In the bud? Disk array producers as a（possibly） emergent organizational form[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48（1）: 60–93. DOI:10.2307/3556619
18 Navis C, Glynn M A. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2010, 55（3）: 439–471. DOI:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439
19 Ocasio W, Mauskapf M, Steele C W J. History, society, and institutions: The role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2016, 41（4）: 676–699. DOI:10.5465/amr.2014.0183
20 Pache A C, Santos F. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56（4）: 972–1001. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.0405
21 Perkmann M, Spicer A. How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage[J]. Organization Science, 2014, 25（6）: 1785–1806. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2014.0916
22 Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M. What's ‘New’ about new forms of organizing?[J] Academy of Management Review, 2014, 39（2）: 162–180. DOI:10.5465/amr.2011.0436
23 Rao H, Monin P, Durand R. Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in french gastronomy[J]. American Sociological Review, 2005, 70（6）: 968–991. DOI:10.1177/000312240507000605
24 Sato I, Haga M, Yamada M. Lost and gained in translation: The Role of the " American Model” in the institution-building of a Japanese University press[J]. Cultural Sociology, 2015, 9（3）: 347–363. DOI:10.1177/1749975515592654
25 Weber M S, Fulk J, Monge P. The emergence and evolution of social networking sites as an organizational form[J]. Management Communication Quarterly, 2016, 30（3）: 305–332. DOI:10.1177/0893318916629547
26 Yu K H. Institutionalization in the context of institutional pluralism: Politics as a generative process[J]. Organization Studies, 2013, 34（1）: 105–131. DOI:10.1177/0170840612464755
引用本文
佘雪琼, 王利平. 新组织形式如何形成？——对50年研究的回顾与整合[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(3): 34-53.
导出参考文献，格式为：
