, 1
8763 
8630双元领导是指由两种相异领导行为构成并通过二者平衡互补以应对环境变化的一种新型领导风格。双元领导比单元领导更加常见，然而这种领导风格对员工职业生涯成功的影响研究却比较缺失。基于本土企业338份员工及其直接上司配对样本，本文对双元领导如何影响员工职业生涯成功进行了探究。研究发现，双元领导对员工的职业生涯成功有显著影响；中介效应研究发现，双元领导对员工职业生涯成功的影响主要是通过员工对领导的认同来发挥作用的；通过被调节的中介作用模型发现，以上中介效应受到员工主动性人格的影响，即主动性人格越低的员工，双元领导对领导认同的影响会越强，最终影响员工职业生涯成功的作用也越强。研究结论不仅丰富了跨文化情境下双元领导的理论研究，还能为企业有效开展员工的职业生涯管理提供参考。
双元领导如何影响员工职业生涯成功？——一个被调节的中介作用模型
摘要
参考文献
1 陈建勋. 组织学习的前因后果研究: 基于二元视角[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32（6）: 140–149.
2 陈永霞, 贾良定, 李超平, 等. 变革型领导、心理授权与员工的组织承诺: 中国情景下的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2006 （1）: 96–105.
3 韩翼, 杨百寅. 师徒关系开启徒弟职业成功之门: 政治技能视角[J]. 管理世界, 2012, 6: 124–133.
4 蒋琳锋, 袁登华. 个人主动性的研究现状与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17（1）: 165–171.
5 罗瑾琏, 赵莉, 韩杨, 等. 双元领导研究进展述评[J]. 管理学报, 2016, 13（12）: 1882–1889. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2016.12.018
6 毛畅果, 孙健敏. 基于主动性人格调节作用的工作场所不文明行为危害研究[J]. 管理学报, 2013, 10（5）: 708–714.
7 魏峰, 袁欣, 邸杨. 交易型领导、团队授权氛围和心理授权影响下属创新绩效的跨层次研究[J]. 管理世界, 2009（4）: 135–142.
8 吴敏, 黄旭, 徐玖平, 阎洪, 时勘. 交易型领导、变革型领导与家长式领导行为的比较研究[J]. 科研管理, 2007（03）: 168–176.
9 杨春江, 冯秋龙, 田子州. 变革型领导与员工任务绩效: 主动性人格和领导—成员交换的作用[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29 （1）: 39–46.
10 Abele A E, Hagmaier T, Spurk D. Does career success make you happy? The mediating role of multiple subjective success evaluations[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2016, 17（4）: 1615–1633. DOI:10.1007/s10902-015-9662-4
11 Aiken L S, West S G, Reno R R. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions [M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
12 Avolio B J, Bass B M, Jung D I. Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 1999, 72（4）: 441–462. DOI:10.1348/096317999166789
13 Ballout H I. Career success: The effects of human capital, person-environment fit and organizational support[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2007, 22（8）: 741–765. DOI:10.1108/02683940710837705
14 Bass B M. Theory of transformational leadership redux[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6（4）: 463–478. DOI:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90021-7
15 Bateman T S, Crant J M. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993, 14（2）: 103–118. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
16 Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51（6）: 1173–1182. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
17 Braun S, Peus C, Weisweiler S, et al. Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24（1）: 270–283. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.11.006
18 Brown C, Medoff J. The employer size-wage effect[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97（5）: 1027–1059. DOI:10.1086/261642
19 Burns J M. Leadership[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
20 Chan S C H, Huang X, Snape E, et al. The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates’ organization-based self-esteem, and performance[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34（1）: 108–128. DOI:10.1002/job.1797
21 Chen Z X, Aryee S. Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50（1）: 226–238. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24162389
22 Duncan R B. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation[J]. The Management of Organization, 1976, 1: 167–188.
23 Eby L T, Butts M, Lockwood A. Predictors of success in the era of the boundaryless career[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2003, 24（6）: 689–708. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
24 Edwards M R, Peccei R. Perceived organizational support, organizational identification, and employee outcomes[J]. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 2010, 9（1）: 17–26. DOI:10.1027/1866-5888/a000007
25 Forret M L, Dougherty T W. Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2001, 26（3）: 283–311.
26 Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47（2）: 209–226. DOI:10.2307/20159573
27 Grant A M, Ashford S J. The dynamics of proactivity at work[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008, 28: 3–34. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
28 Greenhaus J H, Parasuraman S, Wormley W M. Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33（1）: 64–86. DOI:10.2307/256352
29 Gupta A K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49（4）: 693–706. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026
30 Herman H M, Chiu W C K. Transformational leadership and job performance: A social identity perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67（1）: 2827–2835. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.07.018
31 Heslin P A. Conceptualizing and evaluating career success[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005, 26（2）: 113–136. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
32 Judge T A, Cable D M, Boudreau J W, et al. An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1995, 48（3）: 485–519. DOI:10.1111/peps.1995.48.issue-3
33 Kark R, Shamir B, Chen G. The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88（2）: 246–255. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246
34 Keller T, Weibler J. What it takes and costs to be an ambidextrous manager: Linking leadership and cognitive strain to balancing exploration and exploitation[J]. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2014, 22（1）: 1–18.
35 Lewis M W, Green S G. Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45（3）: 546–564. DOI:10.2307/3069380
36 Lührmann T, Eberl P. Leadership and identity construction: Reframing the leader-follower interaction from an identity theory perspective[J]. Leadership, 2007, 3（1）: 115–127. DOI:10.1177/1742715007073070
37 McBride A A, Mendoza J L, Carraher S M. Development of a biodata index to measure service-orientation[J]. Psychological Reports, 1997, 81（3 suppl）: 1395–1407.
38 Newman A, Schwarz G, Cooper B, et al. How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2015: 1–14.
39 Pratt M G. Central questions in organizational identification[J]. Identity in Organizations, 1998: 171–207.
40 Preacher K J, Rucker D D, Hayes A F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007, 42（1）: 185–227. DOI:10.1080/00273170701341316
41 Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators[J]. Journal of Management, 2008, 34（3）: 375–409. DOI:10.1177/0149206308316058
42 Riaz A, Haider M H. Role of transformational and transactional leadership on job satisfaction and career satisfaction[J]. Business and Economic Horizons, 2010, 1（1）: 29–38.
43 Rode J C, Arthaud-Day M L, Mooney C H, et al. Ability and personality predictors of salary, perceived job success, and perceived career success in the initial career stage[J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2008, 16（3）: 292–299. DOI:10.1111/ijsa.2008.16.issue-3
44 Schreuders J, Legesse A. Organizational ambidexterity: how small technology firms balance innovation and support[J]. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2012, 2（2）: 17–21.
45 Seibert S E, Kraimer M L. The five-factor model of personality and career success[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001, 58（1）: 1–21. DOI:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757
46 Scott C R, Connaughton S L, Diaz-Saenz H R, et al. The Impacts of Communication and Multiple Identifications on Intent to Leave A Multimethodological Exploration[J]. Management Communication Quarterly, 1999, 12（3）: 400–435. DOI:10.1177/0893318999123002
47 Sluss D M, Klimchak M, Holmes J J. Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2008, 73（3）: 457–464. DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.001
48 Smith W K, Tushman M L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams[J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16（5）: 522–536. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
49 Sosik J J, Godshalk V M, Yammarino F J. Transformational leadership, learning goal orientation, and expectations for career success in mentor-protégé relationships: A multiple levels of analysis perspective[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, 15（2）: 241–261. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.003
50 Walumbwa F O, Hartnell C A. Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 84（1）: 153–172. DOI:10.1348/096317910X485818
51 Zacher H, Robinson A J, Rosing K. Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors[J]. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 2014, 55（1）: 24–46.
52 Zacher H, Rosing K. Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2015, 36（1）: 54–68.
53 Zhang Y, Chen C C. Developmental leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating effects of self-determination, supervisor identification, and organizational identification[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24（4）: 534–543. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.03.007
引用本文
赵红丹, 江苇. 双元领导如何影响员工职业生涯成功？——一个被调节的中介作用模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(1): 93–106.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：共益企业：研究述评与未来展望
