创业过程中因果逻辑和效果逻辑如何协调？ -- 上海财经大学期刊社

5 厉杰, 孙瑞杰. 社会企业创立过程影响因素探究[J]. 科学学研究,2020, 38(9): 1647-1653. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2020.09.013

6 李悦. 管理者双元性研究现状探析和未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2018, 40(8): 112-124.

7 凌鸿, 赵付春, 邓少军. 双元性理论和概念的批判性回顾与未来研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2010, 32(1): 25-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4950.2010.01.004

8 刘东, 刘军. 事件系统理论原理及其在管理科研与实践中的应用分析[J]. 管理学季刊,2017, 2(2): 64-80.

9 彭学兵, 王乐, 刘玥伶, 等. 效果推理决策逻辑下创业资源整合与新创企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 管理评论,2019, 31(8): 123-131.

10 苏涛永, 陶丰烨. 效果推理与因果推理: 哪种决策逻辑更有效?——一项基于Meta分析的研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2019, 40(8): 87-97.

11 孙烨, 侯力赫, 刘金桥. 累积经验与并购绩效: 从成功和失败中学习[J]. 财经论丛,2021, (8): 69-80.

12 王乐, 龙静. 不同环境下效果推理、因果推理与创业拼凑的关系——基于阴阳观视角[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2019, 40(9): 101-118.

13 吴隽, 张建琦, 刘衡. 效率型商业模式创新与企业绩效关系研究——因果推理与效果推理的调节作用[J]. 技术经济与管理研究,2016, (3): 8-13. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-292X.2016.03.002

14 谢雅萍, 梁素蓉, 陈睿君. 失败学习、创业行动学习与创业能力——悲痛恢复取向的调节作用[J]. 管理评论,2017, 29(4): 47-58.

15 熊立, 曹元坤, 朱建斌. 国外个体二元性研究前沿及展望[J]. 管理评论,2018, 30(4): 142-156.

16 徐菊, 陈德棉. 非连续事件对创业学习的作用机制研究[J]. 科学学研究,2020, 38(7): 1260-1267. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2020.07.013

17 徐可, 于淏川, 陈卫东. 在孵企业创新驱动研究: 网络权力与关系承诺视角[J]. 南开管理评论,2019, 22(5): 38-48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2019.05.005

18 徐平磊, 贾迎亚, 于晓宇. 效果推理、创业团队凝聚力与新产品开发绩效[J]. 管理学报,2020, 17(2): 251-258. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2020.02.011

19 张默, 任声策. 创业者如何从事件中塑造创业能力?——基于事件系统理论的连续创业案例研究[J]. 管理世界,2018, 34(11): 134-149, 196. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.11.012

20 张秀娥, 乐媛. 手段导向对国际创业绩效的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究,2022, 40(3): 495-504,515. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2022.03.012

21 张振刚, 刘子琪, 尚钰. 制造企业如何从事件中提升创新质量——基于事件系统理论的企业成长案例研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020, 37(21): 72-81. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2019100169

22 钟榴, 余光胜, 潘闻闻. 从目标导向逻辑到手段导向逻辑——初创企业产品创新流程决策[J]. 科研管理,2019, 40(6): 205-214.

23 周小虎, 陈莹, 王帅彬. 创业认知的形成机制——双加工系统及其选择研究[J]. 管理案例研究与评论,2015, 8(4): 367-379.

24 左亚文, 刘争明. 论逻辑矛盾与辩证矛盾及其辩证关系——矛盾辩证法再探之一[J]. 马克思主义理论学科研究,2019, 5(5): 38-48.

25 Alsos G A, Clausen T H, Hytti U, et al. Entrepreneurs’ social identity and the preference of causal and effectual behaviours in start-up processes[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development,2016, 28(3-4): 234-258.

26 Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003, 28(2): 238-256. DOI:10.5465/amr.2003.9416096

27 Berends H, van Burg E, Garud R. Pivoting or persevering with venture ideas: Recalibrating temporal commitments[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2021, 36(4): 106126. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106126

28 Braun I, Sieger P. Under pressure: Family financial support and the ambidextrous use of causation and effectuation[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2021, 15(4): 716-749. DOI:10.1002/sej.1388

29 Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, et al. Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2012, 27(2): 167-184. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001

30 Bruyaka O, Philippe D, Castañer X. Run away or stick together? The impact of organization-specific adverse events on alliance partner defection[J]. Academy of Management Review,2018, 43(3): 445-469. DOI:10.5465/amr.2014.0323

31 Chandler G N, DeTienne D R, McKelvie A, et al. Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2011, 26(3): 375-390. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006

32 Dew N, Read S, Sarasvathy S D, et al. Outlines of a behavioral theory of the entrepreneurial firm[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2008, a,66(1): 37-59.

33 Dew N, Read S, Sarasvathy S D, et al. Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(4): 287-309. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002

34 Dew N, Sarasvathy S D, Read S, et al. Immortal firms in mortal markets? An entrepreneurial perspective on the “innovator’s dilemma”[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management,2008, b,11(3): 313-329.

35 Duncan R B. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation[A]. Kilmann R H, Pondy L R, Slevin D. The management of organization[M]. New York: North-Holland, 1976.

36 Frese T, Geiger I, Dost F. An empirical investigation of determinants of effectual and causal decision logics in online and high-tech start-up firms[J]. Small Business Economics,2020, 54(3): 641-664. DOI:10.1007/s11187-019-00147-8

37 Futterer F, Schmidt J, Heidenreich S. Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance[J]. Long Range Planning,2018, 51(1): 64-81. DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.008

38 Gabrielsson J, Politis D. Career motives and entrepreneurial decision-making: Examining preferences for causal and effectual logics in the early stage of new ventures[J]. Small Business Economics,2011, 36(3): 281-298. DOI:10.1007/s11187-009-9217-3

39 Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2004, 47(2): 209-226.

40 Gupta A K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006, 49(4): 693-706. DOI:10.5465/amj.2006.22083026

41 Henninger P, Brem A, Giones F, et al. Effectuation vs. causation: Can established firms use start-up decision-making principles to stay innovative?[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management,2020, 24(1): 2050002. DOI:10.1142/S1363919620500024

42 Karhu P, Ritala P, Viola L. How do ambidextrous teams create new products? Cognitive ambidexterity, analogies, and new product creation[J]. Knowledge and Process Management,2016, 23(1): 3-17. DOI:10.1002/kpm.1499

43 Laine I, Galkina T. The interplay of effectuation and causation in decision making: Russian SMEs under institutional uncertainty[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,2017, 13(3): 905-941. DOI:10.1007/s11365-016-0423-6

44 Lewis M W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide[J]. Academy of Management Review,2000, 25(4): 760-776. DOI:10.5465/amr.2000.3707712

45 Maine E, Soh P H, Dos Santos N. The role of entrepreneurial decision-making in opportunity creation and recognition[J]. Technovation,2015, 39-40: 53-72. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.02.007

46 Matalamäki M J. Effectuation, an emerging theory of entrepreneurship - towards a mature stage of the development[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,2017, 24(4): 928-949. DOI:10.1108/JSBED-02-2017-0030

47 McKelvie A, Chandler G N, DeTienne D R, et al. The measurement of effectuation: Highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future[J]. Small Business Economics,2020, 54(3): 689-720. DOI:10.1007/s11187-019-00149-6

48 Morgeson F P, DeRue D S. Event criticality, urgency, and duration: Understanding how events disrupt teams and influence team leader intervention[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2006, 17(3): 271-287. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.006

49 Morgeson F P, Mitchell T R, Liu D. Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences[J]. Academy of Management Review,2015, 40(4): 515-537. DOI:10.5465/amr.2012.0099

50 Morgeson F P. The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2005, 90(3): 497-508. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.497

51 Mumford A. Four approaches to learning from experience[J]. The Learning Organization,1994, 1(1): 4-10.

52 Nummela N, Saarenketo S, Jokela P, et al. Strategic decision-making of a born global: A comparative study from three small open economies[J]. Management International Review,2014, 54(4): 527-550. DOI:10.1007/s11575-014-0211-x

53 Palmié M, Huerzeler P, Grichnik D, et al. Some principles are more equal than others: Promotion-versus prevention-focused effectuation principles and their disparate relationships with entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2019, 13(1): 93-117.

54 Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators[J]. Journal of Management,2008, 34(3): 375-409. DOI:10.1177/0149206308316058

55 Ranabahu N, Barrett M. Does practice make micro-entrepreneurs perfect? An investigation of expertise acquisition using effectuation and causation[J]. Small Business Economics,2020, 54(3): 883-905. DOI:10.1007/s11187-019-00157-6

56 Rauch A, Hulsink W. Just one damned thing after another: Towards an event-based perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2021,doi: 10.1177/10422587211061738.

57 Read S, Sarasvathy S D. Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise[J]. The Journal of Private Equity,2005, 9(1): 45-62. DOI:10.3905/jpe.2005.605370

58 Reymen I M M J, Andries P, Berends H, et al. Understanding dynamics of strategic decision making in venture creation: A process study of effectuation and causation[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2015, 9(4): 351-379. DOI:10.1002/sej.1201

59 Reymen I, Berends H, Oudehand R, et al. Decision making for business model development: A process study of effectuation and causation in new technology-based ventures[J]. R& D Management,2017, 47(4): 595-606.

60 Sarasvathy S D. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001, 26(2): 243-263. DOI:10.5465/amr.2001.4378020

61 Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga J F, et al. A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2009, 46(5): 864-894. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x

62 Sirén C, Parida V, Patel P C, et al. Rushed and short on time: The negative effects of temporal planning and flexible pacing style on the entrepreneurial alertness-effectuation relationship[J]. Journal of Business Research,2019, 101: 555-560. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.025

63 Smith W K, Tushman M L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams[J]. Organization Science,2005, 16(5): 522-536. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1050.0134

64 Smolka K M, Verheul I, Burmeister-Lamp K, et al. Get it together! synergistic effects of causal and effectual decision-making logics on venture performance[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2018, 42(4): 571-604. DOI:10.1177/1042258718783429

65 Turner N, Maylor H, Swart J. Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2015, 33(1): 177-188. DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.05.002

66 Turner N, Swart J, Maylor H. Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2013, 15(3): 317-332. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x

67 Tushman M L, O’Reilly III C A. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review,1996, 38(4): 8-29. DOI:10.2307/41165852

68 Wei Z L, Zhang L Q. How to perform strategic change? A strategy as practice perspective[J]. Chinese Management Studies,2020, 14(3): 811-832. DOI:10.1108/CMS-04-2019-0140

69 Welter C, Kim S. Effectuation under risk and uncertainty: A simulation model[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2018, 33(1): 100-116. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.005

70 Wiltbank R, Dew N, Read S, et al. What to do next? The case for non-predictive strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006, 27(10): 981-998. DOI:10.1002/smj.555

71 Wu L, Liu H, Su K. Exploring the dual effect of effectuation on new product development speed and quality[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 106: 82-93. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.016