3072 
2618使命效价是指员工对组织使命的参与、被吸引以及对其价值的感知程度，体现了个体对组织价值的体悟状态和对组织使命的融入水平，是实现个体发展和提升组织绩效的重要因素。国外学者已对使命效价展开了一系列研究，但国内关于该领域的研究尚处于起步阶段，缺乏相关研究梳理与系统述评。为了更好地推动和增强使命效价理论研究进展与管理实践成效，本文对使命效价相关研究进行系统梳理。首先，基于个体感知视角与组织效能视角对使命效价的概念进行梳理讨论，并通过与相近概念辨析，进一步明晰使命效价概念的内涵和外延。其次，从组织工作重要程度和个体情绪唤醒程度论述有关使命效价的测量方法。再次，基于不同层次与理论视角对使命效价的前因变量、作用机制及结果变量进行分层归纳，进而构建使命效价研究的整合分析框架。最后，针对现有研究的局限，从前因体系、作用机制、结果变量、数据方法及学科融合五个方面进行未来研究展望。
使命效价：文献述评与研究展望
摘要
参考文献
4 Becker A. An experimental study of voluntary nonprofit accountability and effects on public trust, reputation, perceived quality, and donation behavior[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2018, 47(3): 562-582. DOI:10.1177/0899764018756200
5 Bosak J, Kilroy S, Chênevert D, et al. Examining the role of transformational leadership and mission valence on burnout among hospital staff[J]. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness:People and Performance,2021, 8(2): 208-227. DOI:10.1108/JOEPP-08-2020-0151
6 Caillier J G. Do transformational leaders affect turnover intentions and extra-role behaviors through mission valence?[J]. The American Review of Public Administration,2016, 46(2): 226-242. DOI:10.1177/0275074014551751
7 Duffy R D, Dik B J, Douglass R P, et al. Work as a calling: A theoretical model[J]. Journal of Counseling Psychology,2018, 65(4): 423-439. DOI:10.1037/cou0000276
8 Faulk L, Pandey S, Pandey S K, et al. Donors’ responses to profit incentives in the social sector: The entrepreneurial orientation reward and the profit penalty[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,2020, 39(1): 218-242. DOI:10.1002/pam.22179
9 Guerrero S, Chênevert D. Municipal employees’ performance and neglect: The effects of mission valence[J]. Review of Public Personnel Administration,2021, 41(3): 447-465. DOI:10.1177/0734371X19896013
10 Jeon K S, Choi B K. Workplace spirituality, organizational commitment and life satisfaction: The moderating role of religious affiliation[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management,2021, 34(5): 1125-1143. DOI:10.1108/JOCM-01-2021-0012
11 Kashif M, Petrovskaya I, Samad S, et al. Leaving in mascot of silence: Organizational determinants of employee turnover intentions in mediating and moderating roles of quiescent silence and coworker support in a Russian context[J]. Central European Management Journal,2021, 29(2): 121-146. DOI:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.48
12 Kim T, Sezer O, Schroeder J, et al. Work group rituals enhance the meaning of work[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2021, 165: 197-212. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.05.005
13 Labre J F, Lauzier M. Studying the influences of organizational learning on turnover intentions, absenteeism, and organizational performance among employees working in a French-Canadian hospital[J]. International Journal of Training Research,2021, 19(1): 1-20. DOI:10.1080/14480220.2020.1864439
14 Mayfield M, Mayfield J, Ma K Q. Innovation matters: Creative environment, absenteeism, and job satisfaction[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management,2020, 33(5): 715-735. DOI:10.1108/JOCM-09-2019-0285
16 Resh W G, Marvel J D, Wen B. The persistence of prosocial work effort as a function of mission match[J]. Public Administration Review,2018, 78(1): 116-125. DOI:10.1111/puar.12882
17 Willems J, Faulk L. Does voluntary disclosure matter when organizations violate stakeholder trust?[J]. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration,2019, 2(1): 1-16. DOI:10.31219/osf.io/wj2ep
18 Willems J, Faulk L, Boenigk S. Reputation shocks and recovery in public-serving organizations: The moderating effect of mission valence[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2021, 31(2): 311-327. DOI:10.1093/jopart/muaa041
19 Yahaya R, Ebrahim F. Leadership styles and organizational commitment: Literature review[J]. Journal of Management Development,2016, 35(2): 190-216. DOI:10.1108/JMD-01-2015-0004
引用本文
于洋航, 张雅萍. 使命效价：文献述评与研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(5): 101-116.
导出参考文献，格式为：
