作为分析和解释组织行为的一个有力工具,组织合法性逐渐成为了组织研究者们关注的热点话题。迄今为止,学者们主要从三条路径来开展对组织合法性的探讨:制度路径、战略路径和评价者路径。评价者路径是组织合法性研究的新动向和新视角,该路径的核心概念为合法性判断,即评价者围绕特定组织是否具有合法性所进行的自我判断。本文阐明了合法性判断的概念内涵,分析了合法性判断的判断模式与评价视角、合法性判断的心理历程以及合法性判断理论的应用价值,最后进行了合法性判断理论的研究展望。
基于评价者视角的组织合法性研究:合法性判断
摘要
参考文献
1 Bitektine A, Haack P. The " macro” and the " micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2015, 40(1): 49–75. DOI:10.5465/amr.2013.0318
2 Bitektine A. Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(1): 151–179.
3 DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147–160. DOI:10.2307/2095101
4 Greenwood R, Suddaby R. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(1): 27–48. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785498
5 Haack P, Pfarrer M D, Scherer A G. Legitimacy-as-feeling: How affect leads to vertical legitimacy spillovers in transnational governance[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2014, 51(4): 634–666. DOI:10.1111/joms.2014.51.issue-4
6 Hegtvedt K A, Johnson C. Justice beyond the individual: A future with legitimation[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2000, 63(4): 298–311. DOI:10.2307/2695841
7 Johnson C, Dowd T J, Ridgeway C L. Legitimacy as a social process[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2006, 32(1): 53–78. DOI:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101
8 Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, 108(3): 480–498. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
9 Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(1): 145–179. DOI:10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002
10 Parsons T. Structure and process in modern societies[M]. New York: Free Press, 1960.
11 Reast J, Maon F, Lindgreen A, et al. Legitimacy-seeking organizational strategies in controversial industries: A case study analysis and a bidimensional model[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 118(1): 139–153. DOI:10.1007/s10551-012-1571-4
12 Schneiberg M, Clemens E S. The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis[J]. Sociological Theory, 2006, 24(3): 195–227. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2006.00288.x
13 Skitka L J, Bauman C W, Lytle B L. Limits on legitimacy: Moral and religious convictions as constraints on deference to authority[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 97(4): 567–578. DOI:10.1037/a0015998
14 Suchman M C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 571–610.
15 Tost L P. An integrative model of legitimacy judgments[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(4): 686–710.
16 Tyler T R. The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1997, 1(4): 323–345. DOI:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4
17 Tyler T R. Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2006, 57(1): 375–400. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
18 Weber M, Roth G, Wittich C. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1924.
19 Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(3): 414–431.
引用本文
刘云, Wang GGreg. 基于评价者视角的组织合法性研究:合法性判断[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(5): 73–84.
导出参考文献,格式为:
本期封面
相关论文