5900 
5992鉴于母国与东道国间的制度距离客观存在,跨国企业在东道国市场的"合法化"问题日益凸显。本文在梳理相关文献的基础上,首先阐明了不同理论体系下"合法化"概念的本质特征;然后基于制度同构理论视角,系统阐释了跨国企业东道国市场"合法化"来源及途径;再依据跨国企业与东道国市场主体特征的不同,对现有跨国企业东道国市场"合法化"策略进行了系统归类,并就每一类策略特征进行了阐释和总结;在此基础上,就跨国企业东道国市场"合法化"的概念测度、结果变量选取及国别数据分析等相关实证研究做了系统梳理;最后对未来相关研究重点及研究方向予以展望,供后续研究及企业国际化实践参考。
跨国企业在东道国市场的“合法化”:研究述评与展望
摘要
参考文献
1 Alcantara L, et al. Legitimacy in international joint ventures:It is still needed. Journal of International Management, 2006, 12(4): 389–407
2 Ashforth B E and Gibbs B W. The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1990, 1(2): 177–194
3 Cantwell J, et al. An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity:The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 2010, 41(4): 567–586
4 Chan C M and Makino S. Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments:Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(4): 621–638
5 Deephouse D L. Does isomorphism legitimate?. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(4): 1024–1039
6 Delmestri G and Wezel F C. Breaking the wave:The contested legitimation of an alien organizational form. Journal of International Business Studies, 2011, 42(6): 828–852
7 DiMaggio P J and Powell W W. The iron cage revisited:Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147–160
8 Dodge H R and Robbins J E. An empirical investigation of the organizational life cycle model for small business development and survival. Journal of Small Business Management, 1992, 30(1): 27–37
9 Elsbach K D and Sutton R I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions:A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 1992, 35(4): 699–738
10 Glynn M A and Marquis C. When good names go bad:Symbolic illegitimacy in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 2004, 22: 147–170
11 Klossek A, et al. Chinese enterprises in Germany:Establishment modes and strategies to mitigate the liability of foreignness. Journal of World Business, 2012, 47(1): 35–44
12 Kostova T and Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity:The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(1): 64–81
13 Lin Z A, et al. How do networks and learning drive M&As? An institutional comparison between China and the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30(10): 1113–1132
14 Liou R S, et al. Emerging-market multinational corporations as agents of globalization:Conflicting institutional demands and the isomorphism of global markets[A].Tihanyi L,et al.Institutional theory in international business and management. Bingley,UK:Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2012 : 179–206
15 Luo Y D and Rui H C. An ambidexterity perspective toward multinational enterprises from emerging economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2009, 23(4): 49–70
16 Meyer R E and Hammerschmid G. Changing institutional logics and executive identities a managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 2006, 49(7): 1000–1014
17 Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 1991, 16(1): 145–179
18 Rodrigues S and Child J. Co-evolution in an institutionalized environment. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(8): 2137–2162
19 Rutherford M W and Buller P F. Searching for the legitimacy threshold. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2007, 16(1): 78–92
20 ScottW RInstitutions and organizationsThousand Oaks,CA:Sage1995
21 Suchman M C. Managing legitimacy:Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(3): 571–610
22 Tan J and Wang L. MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure:An institutional logic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, 98(3): 373–390
23 Turcan R V, et al. Empirical studies on legitimation strategies:A case for international business research extension. Advances in International Management, 2012, 25: 425–470
24 Vaara E and Tienar J. A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 2008, 33(4): 985–993
25 李 军, 王 玉荣. 制度学习、网络中心性和市场进入——跨国风险资本在华投资的实证研究. 国际贸易问题, 2013 (1): 131–145
26 刘 娟. 跨国企业制度学习研究述评与展望. 外国经济与管理, 2015 (2): 29–37
27 任 兵, 郑 莹. 外来者劣势研究前沿探析与未来展望. 外国经济与管理, 2012 (2): 27–34
引用本文
刘娟. 跨国企业在东道国市场的“合法化”:研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2016, 38(3): 99–112.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：家族涉入与企业技术创新
