7680 
7321悖论式领导是一种运用矛盾和整合思维平衡和协调环境变化的新型领导风格。已有文献表明悖论式领导对员工主动行为具有积极的影响，然而悖论式领导影响员工主动行为的内在作用机理尚未明晰。本文基于58名直接上司和209名下属的配对调查数据，从社会网络的关系视角探讨了悖论式领导如何影响员工主动行为，并进一步考察了上下级关系对团队内部网络连带强度与员工主动行为关系间的影响。结果表明：悖论式领导对员工主动行为有显著的正向影响；悖论式领导对员工主动行为的影响主要是通过团队内部网络连带强度来发挥作用；团队内部网络连带强度与员工主动行为之间的关系受到上下级关系的影响，即上下级关系越强，团队内部网络连带强度对员工主动行为的影响越弱。本研究的结论不但丰富了悖论式领导作用机制的研究成果，而且为企业有效激发员工的主动行为提供了实践参考。
悖论式领导对员工主动行为的影响机制——团队内部网络连带强度与上下级关系的作用
摘要
参考文献
3 罗瑾琏, 花常花, 钟竞. 悖论式领导对知识团队创新的影响及作用机制研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, （11）: 121–125. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2015010325
15 Carter D R, DeChurch L A, Braun M T, et al. Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100（3）: 597–622. DOI:10.1037/a0038922
16 Chang M L. On the relationship between intragroup conflict and social capital in teams: A longitudinal investigation in Taiwan[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2017, 38（1）: 3–27. DOI:10.1002/job.v38.1
17 Chung Y, Jackson S E. The internal and external networks of knowledge-intensive teams: The role of task routineness[J]. Journal of Management, 2013, 39（2）: 442–468. DOI:10.1177/0149206310394186
18 Den Hartog D N, Belschak F D. When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2012, 97（1）: 194–202. DOI:10.1037/a0024903
19 Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91（3）: 481–510. DOI:10.1086/228311
21 Griffin M A, Neal A, Parker S K. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50（2）: 327–347. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
22 Hobfoll S E. Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2011, 84（1）: 116–122. DOI:10.1111/joop.2011.84.issue-1
23 Lewis M W, Andriopoulos C, Smith W K. Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility[J]. California Management Review, 2014, 56（3）: 58–77. DOI:10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.58
24 Parker S K, Bindl U K, Strauss K. Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation[J]. Journal of Management, 2010, 36（4）: 827–856. DOI:10.1177/0149206310363732
25 Probst G, Raisch S, Tushman M L. Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 2011, 40（4）: 326–334. DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.07.010
27 Shao Y, Nijstad B A, Täuber S. Paradoxical leader behavior and creativity: The role of employee cognitive complexity[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017, 2017（1）: 10522. DOI:10.5465/ambpp.2017.10522abstract
28 She Z L, Li Q. Paradoxical leader behaviors and follower job performance: Examining a moderated mediation model[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017, 2017（1）: 13558. DOI:10.5465/ambpp.2017.13558abstract
30 Sonnentag S, Starzyk A. Perceived prosocial impact, perceived situational constraints, and proactive work behavior: Looking at two distinct affective pathways[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36（6）: 806–824. DOI:10.1002/job.v36.6
31 Tripathi N. Hindrance or challenge: Dynamics of paradoxical leadership and subordinate’s work motivation[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017, 2017（1）: 10611. DOI:10.5465/ambpp.2017.10611abstract
32 Wang X H, Fang Y L, Qureshi I, et al. Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader-member exchange perspectives[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2015, 36（3）: 403–420. DOI:10.1002/job.v36.3
33 Zhang L, Deng Y L. Guanxi with supervisor and counterproductive work behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 134（3）: 413–427. DOI:10.1007/s10551-014-2438-7
34 Zhang Y, Waldman D A, Han Y L, et al. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58（2）: 538–566. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
引用本文
彭伟, 李慧. 悖论式领导对员工主动行为的影响机制——团队内部网络连带强度与上下级关系的作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(7): 142-154.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：并购业绩承诺方式的激励效应研究
