本土管理研究何以重要？对质疑观点的回应及对未来研究的建议 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 樊景立, 郑伯壎. 华人组织的家长式领导: 一项文化观点的分析[J]. 本土心理学研究,2000, (13): 127-180.

2 郭毅. 地方性知识: 通往学术自主性的自由之路——“管理学在中国”之我见[J]. 管理学报,2010, (4): 475-488. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2010.04.001

3 郭重庆. 中国管理学者该登场了[J]. 管理学报,2011, (12): 1733-1736, 1747. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2011.12.001

4 韩巍, 曾宪聚. 本土管理的理论贡献: 基于中文研究成果的诠释[J]. 管理学报,2019, (5): 644-651. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.05.002

5 井润田, 卢芳妹. 中国管理理论的本土研究: 内涵、挑战与策略[J]. 管理学报,2012, (11): 1569-1576. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2012.11.001

6 李海洋, 张燕. 情境化知识与普适化理论的有机结合——探索中国管理学研究的理论创新之道[J]. 管理学季刊,2016, (4): 1-17.

7 李磊, 席酉民, 葛京, 等. 领导研究中的“情境”——内容、方法与未来展望[J]. 管理工程学报,2013, (3): 1-10. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6062.2013.03.001

8 李平. 中国管理本土研究: 理念定义及范式设计[J]. 管理学报,2010, (5): 633-641, 648. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2010.05.001

9 李平. 中国本土管理研究与中国传统哲学[J]. 管理学报,2013, (9): 1249-1261. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2013.09.001

10 卢芳妹, 井润田, 尹守军. 中国管理本土研究的困境与路径[J]. 管理学报,2013, (12): 1717-1724. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2013.12.001

11 罗肖依, 孙黎. 生生不息: 破解绩效导向的悖论[J]. 外国经济与管理,2019, (5): 128-140.

12 马塞尔·莫斯著, 汲喆译. 礼物: 古式社会中交换的形式与理由[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2005.

13 齐宝鑫, 武亚军. 转型经济中民营企业成长的中长期激励机制研究——华为推行TUP的产权制度创新实践与理论启示[J]. 复旦学报(社会科学版),2018, (3): 156-169. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0257-0289.2018.03.022

14 孙黎. 蓝军战略[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2018.

15 王琦, 席酉民, 尚玉钒. 和谐管理理论核心: 和谐主题的诠释[J]. 管理评论,2003, (9): 24-30.

16 武亚军, 高旭东, 李明芳. 国际化背景下的中国本土企业战略: 一个理论框架与应用分析[J]. 管理世界,2005, (11): 101-111, 144.

17 武亚军. “战略框架式思考”、“悖论整合”与企业竞争优势——任正非的认知模式分析及管理启示[J]. 管理世界,2013, (4): 150-167.

18 肖建强, 孙黎, 罗肖依. “战略即实践”学派述评——兼与“知行合一”观对话[J]. 外国经济与管理,2018, (3): 3-19.

19 谢佩洪, 魏农建. 中国管理学派本土研究的路径探索[J]. 管理学报,2012, (9): 1255-1262. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2012.09.001

20 徐淑英, 李绪红, 贾良定, 等. 负责任的管理研究: 哲学与实践[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.

21 徐淑英, 吕力. 中国本土管理研究的理论与实践问题: 对徐淑英的访谈[J]. 管理学报,2015, (3): 313-321. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.03.001

22 徐淑英, 张志学. 管理问题与理论建立: 开展中国本土管理研究的策略[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2011, (4): 1-7.

23 闫红, 井润田, 黄雪莲. 组织势: 研究现状与未来研究展望[J]. 管理学报,2016, (1): 148-156. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2016.01.019

24 张毅恒, 曹祖毅, 伊真真. 经济转型中的管理理论创新——2015’中国本土管理研究论坛(第2届)述评[J]. 管理学报,2015, (10): 1436-1441. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.10.004

25 周浩, 龙立荣. 恩威并施, 以德服人——家长式领导研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展,2005, (2): 227-238.

26 Alvesson M, Sandberg J. Generating research questions through problematization[J]. Academy of Management Review,2011, 36(2): 247-271.

27 Barney J B, Zhang S J. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management[J]. Management and Organization Review,2009, 5(1): 15-28.

28 Child J. Context, comparison, and methodology in Chinese management research[J]. Management and Organization Review,2009, 5(1): 57-73. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00136.x

29 DiMaggio P J. Comments on “What Theory is Not”[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1995, 40(3): 391-397. DOI:10.2307/2393790

30 Ghoshal S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education,2005, 4(1): 75-91.

31 Hambrick D C. The field of management’s devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing?[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(6): 1346-1352. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.28166119

32 Hambrick D C, Chen M J. New academic fields as admittance-seeking social movements: The case of strategic management[J]. Academy of Management Review,2008, 33(1): 32-54. DOI:10.5465/amr.2008.27745027

33 Honig B, Lampel J, Baum J A C, et al. Reflections on scientific misconduct in management: Unfortunate incidents or a normative crisis?[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2018, 32(4): 412-442. DOI:10.5465/amp.2015.0167

34 Hwang K K. Face and favor: The Chinese power game[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1987, 92(4): 944-974. DOI:10.1086/228588

35 Jing R T, Dong M. Management scholars’ learning from history: Direct vs. Indirect approach[J]. Management and Organization Review,2017, 13(4): 905-911. DOI:10.1017/mor.2017.59

36 Jing R T, Van de Ven A H. A yin‐yang model of organizational change: The case of Chengdu Bus Group[J]. Management and Organization Review,2014, 10(1): 29-54. DOI:10.1111/more.12045

37 Jing R T. Momentum for change: Connecting Chinese and western perspectives[A]. Best paper proceedings of the seventy-seventh annual meeting of the academy of management[C]. NY: Academy of Management, 2017.

38 Kotter J P. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail[J]. Harvard Business Review,1995, 73(2): 59-67.

39 Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

40 March J G. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies[J]. Management and Organization Review,2005, 1(1): 5-22. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00002.x

41 Marquis C, Battilana J. Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior,2009, 29: 283-302. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.001

42 Nisbett R E, Peng K P, Choi I, et al. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition[J]. Psychological Review,2001, 108(2): 291-309. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291

43 Pellegrini E K, Scandura T A. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research[J]. Journal of Management,2008, 34(3): 566-593. DOI:10.1177/0149206308316063

44 Pellegrini E K, Scandura T A, Jayaraman V. Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory[J]. Group & Organization Management,2010, 35(4): 391-420.

45 Raynard M, Lu F M, Jing R T. Reinventing the state-owned enterprise? Negotiating change during profound environmental upheaval[J/OL]. Academy of Management Journal, 2019. https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amj.2017.1162.

46 Silin R H. Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1976.

47 Smith L T. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples[M]. New York: Zed Books Limited, 1999.

48 Thorngate W. Possible limits on a science of social behavior[A]. Strickland J H, Aboud F E, Gergen K J. Social psychology in transition[M]. Boston: Springer, 1976.

49 Tsui A S. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2004, 21(4): 491-513. DOI:10.1023/B:APJM.0000048715.35108.a7

50 Tsui A S. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the academy and beyond[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(6): 1353-1364. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.28166121

51 Van de Ven A H. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research[M]. Oxford: U. K. Oxford University Press, 2007.

52 Van de Ven A H, Jing R T. Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective[J]. Management and Organization Review,2012, 8(1): 123-137. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00281.x

53 Van de Ven A H, Meyer A D, Jing R T. Opportunities and challenges of engaged indigenous scholarship[J]. Management and Organization Review,2018, 14(3): 449-462. DOI:10.1017/mor.2018.28

54 Whetten D A. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations[J]. Management and Organization Review,2009, 5(1): 29-55.

55 Xi Y M, Cao X W, Xiangli L X. A Chinese view on rebuilding the integrity of management research: The evolving He-Xie management theory[J]. Chinese Management Studies,2010, 4(3): 197-211. DOI:10.1108/17506141011074101

56 Zhang Y, Han Y L. Paradoxical leader behavior in long-term corporate development: Antecedents and consequences[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2019, 155: 42-54. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.007

57 Zhang Y, Waldman D A, Han Y L, et al. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(2): 538-566. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0995