[1] Han Weiwei, Wang Jing. Neurological impact of the conflict between product design and performance on consumer decision process[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017, 20(2): 155-168.
[2] He Yuanyuan, Yuan Jiajin, Wu Zelian, et al. The valence strength of positive stimuli modulates the attention in extraverts study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2008, 40(11): 1158-1164.
[3] Liu Donglai, Wang Yonghui. A review of studies on how object-based attention was influenced by gestalt principle objects and top-down fashion[J]. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2013, 11(4): 561-568.
[4] Liu Wumei, Wang Xuefeng, Yan Yan. Metacognitive experience: An important theoretical cornerstone of consumer behavior research[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(11): 86-98.
[5] Ran Yaxuan, Liu Jiani, Zhang Yishi, et al. The magic of one person: The effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 371-385.
[6] Zhang Quancheng, Lai Tianhao, Yang Yuke, et al. Consumers’ multi-sensory interaction: Performance, formation mechanism and research prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017, 39(7): 80-90.
[7] Alter A L, Oppenheimer D M. Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(24): 9369-9372.
[8] Bettels J, Wiedmann K P. Brand logo symmetry and product design: The spillover effects on consumer inferences[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 97: 1-9.
[9] Callahan S P, Ledgerwood A. On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2016, 110(4): 528-550.
[10] Campbell D T. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities[J]. Behavioral Science, 1958, 3(1): 14-25.
[11] Chiu Y P, Lo S K, Hsieh A Y. How colour similarity can make banner advertising effective: Insights from Gestalt theory[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2017, 36(6): 606-619.
[12] Demangeot C, Broderick A J. Consumer perceptions of online shopping environments: A Gestalt approach[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2010, 27(2): 117-140.
[13] Evers E R K, Inbar Y, Zeelenberg M. Set-fit effects in choice[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2014, 143(2): 504-509.
[14] Folkman S, Lazarus R S, Dunkel-Schetter C, et al. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50(5): 992-1003.
[15] Gaertner L, Schopler J. Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1998, 28(6): 963-980.
[16] Garaus M. Atmospheric harmony in the retail environment: Its influence on store satisfaction and re-patronage intention[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2017, 16(3): 265-278.
[17] Garaus M, Wagner U, Kummer C. Cognitive fit, retail shopper confusion, and shopping value: Empirical investigation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(5): 1003-1011.
[18] Grinstein A, Hagtvedt H, Kronrod A. Aesthetically (dis)pleasing visuals: A dual pathway to empathy and prosocial behavior[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2019, 36(1): 83-99.
[19] Grohmann B, Giese J L, Parkman I D. Using type font characteristics to communicate brand personality of new brands[J]. Journal of Brand Management, 2013, 20(5): 389-403.
[20] Hagtvedt H. The impact of incomplete typeface logos on perceptions of the firm[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2011, 75(4): 86-93.
[21] Hamilton D L, Sherman S J. Perceiving persons and groups[J]. Psychological Review, 1996, 103(2): 336-355.
[22] Janiszewski C, Kuo A, Tavassoli N T. The influence of selective attention and inattention to products on subsequent choice[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2013, 39(6): 1258-1274.
[23] Janiszewski C, Meyvis T. Effects of brand logo complexity, repetition, and spacing on processing fluency and judgment[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2001, 28(1): 18-32.
[24] Karataş M, Gürhan-Canli Z. When consumers prefer bundles with noncomplementary items to bundles with complementary items: The role of mindset abstraction[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2020, 30(1): 24-39.
[25] Karmarkar U R. The impact of “display-set” options on decision-making[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2017, 30(3): 744-753.
[26] Landwehr J R, Labroo A A, Herrmann A. Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts[J]. Marketing Science, 2011, 30(3): 416-429.
[27] Lee H K, Choo H J. Birds of a feather flocked together look abundant: The visual Gestalt effect of an assortment presentation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 104: 170-182.
[28] Lin I Y. The interactive effect of Gestalt situations and arousal seeking tendency on customers’ emotional responses: Matching color and music to specific servicescapes[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2010, 24(4): 294-304.
[29] Makarina N, Hübner R, Florack A. Increased preference and value of consumer products by attentional selection[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10: 2086-2095.
[30] Mishra A. Influence of contagious versus noncontagious product groupings on consumer preferences[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009, 36(1): 73-82.
[31] Mishra H, Mishra A, Nayakankuppam D. Money: A bias for the whole[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2006, 32(4): 541-549.
[32] Peterson M A, Harvey E M, Weidenbacher H J. Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: Which route counts?[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1991, 17(4): 1075-1089.
[33] Pomerantz J R, Sager L C, Stoever R J. Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977, 3(3): 422-435.
[34] Raghubir P, Srivastava J. The denomination effect[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009, 36(4): 701-713.
[35] Sevilla J, Kahn B E. The completeness heuristic: Product shape completeness influences size perceptions, preference, and consumption[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2014, 51(1): 57-68.
[36] Shaddy F, Fishbach A. Seller beware: How bundling affects valuation[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2017, 54(5): 737-751.
[37] Shapiro S A, Nielsen J H. What the blind eye sees: Incidental change detection as a source of perceptual fluency[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2013, 39(6): 1202-1218.
[38] Shen H, Sengupta J. The crossmodal effect of attention on preferences: Facilitation versus impairment[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2014, 40(5): 885-903.
[39] Singh M, Fulvio J M. Bayesian contour extrapolation: Geometric determinants of good continuation[J]. Vision Research, 2007, 47(6): 783-798.
[40] Steinhart T, Gierl H. Are your products arranged in a good shape? The effect of entitativity on the attitudes toward family brands[A]. Bigne E, Rosengren S. Advances in advertising research X[C]. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler, 2019.
[41] VanBergen N, Irmak C, Sevilla J. Product entitativity: How the presence of product replicates increases perceived and actual product efficacy[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2020, doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucaa006.
[42] Wagemans J. Detection of visual symmetries[J]. Spatial Vision, 1995, 9(1): 9-32.
[43] Wagemans J, Elder J H, Kubovy M, et al. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2012, 138(6): 1172-1217.
[44] Winkielman P, Schwarz N, Fazendeiro T A. The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment[A]. Musch J, Klauer K C. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion[C]. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2003.
[45] Yoo J, Kim M. The effects of home page design on consumer responses: Moderating role of centrality of visual product aesthetics[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 38: 240-247.