触不可及还能感同身受吗？——在线产品隐喻文本描述的触觉补偿效应研究 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

7 Abaidi I, Agrebi S, Ben Nasr I, et al. Mental imagery: A lever for valuing an intangible offer[J]. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition),2020, 35(3): 79-101. DOI:10.1177/2051570720954312

8 Andrade J, May J, Deeprose C, et al. Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The plymouth sensory imagery questionnaire[J]. British Journal of Psychology,2014, 105(4): 547-563. DOI:10.1111/bjop.12050

9 Balaji M S, Raghavan S, Jha S. Role of tactile and visual inputs in product evaluation: A multisensory perspective[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics,2011, 23(4): 513-530. DOI:10.1108/13555851111165066

10 Barsalou L W. Grounded cognition[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,2008, 59: 617-645. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

11 Berger C C, Ehrsson H H. The fusion of mental imagery and sensation in the temporal association cortex[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience,2014, 34(41): 13684-13692. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0943-14.2014

12 Bettiga D, Bianchi A M, Lamberti L, et al. Consumers emotional responses to functional and hedonic products: A neuroscience research[J]. Frontiers in Psychology,2020, 11: 559779. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559779

13 Bianchi I, Branchini E, Torquati S, et al. Non experts’ understanding of terms frequently used by experts to describe the sensory properties of wine: An investigation based on opposites[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2021, 92: 104215. DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104215

14 Choi N H, Qiao X X, Wang L. Effects of multisensory cues, self-enhancing imagery and self-goal-achievement emotion on purchase intention[J]. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business,2020, 7(1): 141-151. DOI:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no1.141

15 Di F, Kaboli M, Cheng G. Active prior tactile knowledge transfer for learning tactual properties of new objects[J]. Sensors,2018, 18(2): 634-652. DOI:10.3390/s18020634

16 Duarte P, Silva S C. Need-for-touch and online purchase propensity: A comparative study of Portuguese and Chinese consumers[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2020, 55: 102122. DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102122

17 Feng Y, Zhou R. Does embodiment of verbs influence predicate metaphor processing in a second language? Evidence from picture priming[J]. Frontiers in Psychology,2021, 12: 759175. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759175

18 Forgács B. The pragmatic functions of metaphorical language[A]. Gervain J, Csibra G, Kovács K, eds. A life in cognition[M]. Cham: Springer, 2022.

19 Gentner D, Smith L A. Analogical learning and reasoning[A]. Reisberg D. The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

20 Hartman J, Paradis C. Emotive and sensory simulation through comparative construal[J]. Metaphor and Symbol,2018, 33(2): 123-143. DOI:10.1080/10926488.2018.1434945

21 Hartman J, Paradis C. Figurative meaning in multimodal work by an autistic artist: A cognitive semantic approach[J]. Language and Cognition,2021, 13(1): 1-33. DOI:10.1017/langcog.2020.20

22 Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach[M]. New York: Guilford Press, 2013.

23 Jang S Y, Ha J. The influence of tactile information on the human evaluation of tactile properties[J]. Fashion and Textiles,2021, 8(1): 39. DOI:10.1186/s40691-020-00242-5

24 Jha S, Balaji M S, Peck J, et al. The effects of environmental haptic cues on consumer perceptions of retailer warmth and competence[J]. Journal of Retailing,2020, 96(4): 590-605. DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2020.04.003

25 Karangi S W, Lowe B. Haptics and brands: The effect of touch on product evaluation of branded products[J]. Journal of Consumer Behaviour,2021, 20(6): 1480-1496. DOI:10.1002/cb.1959

26 Kováčová Z, Ciprianová E. From primary meanings of the sensory perceptions of touch and taste to lexicalized metaphors in an associative-semantic network in Slovak[J]. Slovo a Slovesnost,2021, 82(1): 45-66.

27 Kövecses Z. An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory[J]. Review of Cognitive Linguistics,2020, 18(1): 112-130. DOI:10.1075/rcl.00053.kov

28 Kühn F, Lichters M, Krey N. The touchy issue of produce: Need for touch in online grocery retailing[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 117: 244-255. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.017

29 Luangrath A W, Peck J, Hedgcock W, et al. Observing product touch: The vicarious haptic effect in digital marketing and virtual reality[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2022, 59(2): 306-326. DOI:10.1177/00222437211059540

30 Lv X Y, Li H F, Xia L. Effects of haptic cues on consumers’ online hotel booking decisions: The mediating role of mental imagery[J]. Tourism Management,2020, 77: 104025. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104025

31 Maciel I M, Felicio G, Da Silva E T, et al. Mental imagery for multisensory designers: Insights for non-visual design cognition[A]. International conference on research into design[C]. Singapore: Springer, 2021.

32 Mulcahy R F, Riedel A S. “Touch it, swipe it, shake it”: Does the emergence of haptic touch in mobile retailing advertising improve its effectiveness?[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2020, 54: 101613. DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.05.011

33 Overmars S, Poels K. How product representation shapes virtual experiences and re-patronage intentions: The role of mental imagery processing and experiential value[J]. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research,2015, 25(3): 236-259. DOI:10.1080/09593969.2014.988279

34 Paradis C. Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics[J]. Axiomathes,2005, 15(4): 541-573. DOI:10.1007/s10516-004-7680-7

35 Paradis C, Eeg-Olofsson M. Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews[J]. Metaphor and Symbol,2013, 28(1): 22-40. DOI:10.1080/10926488.2013.742838

36 Ranaweera A T, Martin B A S, Jin H S. What you touch, touches you: The influence of haptic attributes on consumer product impressions[J]. Psychology & Marketing,2021, 38(1): 183-195.

37 Rodrigues T, Silva S C, Duarte P. The value of textual haptic information in online clothing shopping[J]. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management,2017, 21(1): 88-102. DOI:10.1108/JFMM-02-2016-0018

38 Rossi M G, Macagno F. The communicative functions of metaphors between explanation and persuasion[A]. Macagno F, Capone A. Inquiries in philosophical pragmatics[M]. Cham: Springer, 2021.

39 Silva S C, Rocha T V, De Cicco R, et al. Need for touch and haptic imagery: An investigation in online fashion shopping[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2021, 59: 102378. DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102378

40 Sung J Y. The perceived lexical space for haptic adjective based on visual texture aroused from need for touch[J]. Design Convergence Study,2013, 12(1): 117-128.

41 Tan L. Human action pattern recognition and semantic research based on embodied cognition theory[J]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence,2020, 34(5): 2055013. DOI:10.1142/S0218001420550137

42 To R N, Patrick V M. How the eyes connect to the heart: The influence of eye gaze direction on advertising effectiveness[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2021, 48(1): 123-146. DOI:10.1093/jcr/ucaa063

43 Van Mulken M, Van Hooft A, Nederstigt U. Finding the tipping point: Visual metaphor and conceptual complexity in advertising[J]. Journal of Advertising,2014, 43(4): 333-343. DOI:10.1080/00913367.2014.920283

44 Yim M Y C, Kim Y K, Lee J. How to easily facilitate consumers’ mental simulation through advertising: The effectiveness of self-referencing image dynamics on purchase intention[J]. International Journal of Advertising,2021, 40(5): 810-834. DOI:10.1080/02650487.2020.1801014

45 Yoo J, Kim M. The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective[J]. Journal of Business Research,2014, 67(11): 2464-2472. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.006

46 Zwaan R A. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2016, 23(4): 1028-1034.