8444 
3167“创业叛逃”是指在创业公司创始人眼中，员工因违反心理契约或法律契约，在岗期间或者离岗后创立同业公司或加入同业公司，利用其在原公司掌握的各种资源展开竞争，并给原公司带来损失的行为。本文通过文献梳理，首先，界定了“创业叛逃”的内涵，阐述了“创业叛逃”与“衍生创业”“离职创业”的区别，围绕契约、去向、时间、数量四个维度分析了“创业叛逃”的特征；其次，依据计划行为理论、情感事件理论、契约理论和知识基础理论，从个体、组织和环境三个层面对“创业叛逃”的前因、过程及结果进行分析；最后，在上述分析的基础上构建了解释“创业叛逃”概念的理论框架，提出了未来的研究方向。本研究不仅因应管理实践发展的需要，从新创企业员工离职创业行为中提炼了“创业叛逃”概念，从创业公司创始人的视角丰富了现有的创业行为理论，也拓展了员工离职创业的理论架构。本文旨在激励学者从管理现象中凝练学术概念，推进“创业叛逃”理论的发展。
创业叛逃：内涵特征、理论框架及研究展望
摘要
参考文献
1 Agarwal R, Campbell B A, Franco A M, et al. What do I take with me? The mediating effect of spin-out team size and tenure on the founder–firm performance relationship[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(3): 1060-1087. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0853
2 Belschak F D, Muhammad R S, Den Hartog D N. Birds of a feather can butt heads: When Machiavellian employees work with Machiavellian leaders[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2018, 151(3): 613-626. DOI:10.1007/s10551-016-3251-2
4 Cai L, Chen B, Chen J Y, et al. Dysfunctional competition & innovation strategy of new ventures as they mature[J]. Journal of Business Research,2017, 78: 111-118. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.008
5 Davidsson P, Recker J, von Briel F. External enablement of new venture creation: A framework[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2020, 34(3): 311-332. DOI:10.5465/amp.2017.0163
6 Dorner M, Fryges H, Schopen K. Wages in high-tech start-ups—Do academic spin-offs pay a wage premium?[J]. Research Policy,2017, 46(1): 1-18. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.002
7 Drnovsek M, Cardon M S, Patel P C. Direct and indirect effects of passion on growing technology ventures[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2016, 10(2): 194-213. DOI:10.1002/sej.1213
8 Furlan A, Grandinetti R. Spinoffs and their endowments: Beyond knowledge inheritance theory[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2016, 17(3): 570-589. DOI:10.1108/JIC-02-2016-0023
9 Gimenez-Fernandez E M, Sandulli F D, Bogers M. Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms[J]. Research Policy,2020, 49(10): 104049. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104049
10 Hampel C E, Tracey P, Weber K. The art of the pivot: How new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2020, 63(2): 440-471. DOI:10.5465/amj.2017.0460
11 Jain P. Discussion Support Paper: Elangovan A R & Shapiro D L (1998) Betrayal of Trust in Organisations[J]. Academy of Management Review,2016, (23): 547-566.
12 Lazar M, Miron-Spektor E, Agarwal R, et al. Entrepreneurial team formation[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2020, 14(1): 29-59. DOI:10.5465/annals.2017.0131
13 Mackey J D, Frieder R E, Brees J R, et al. Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review[J]. Journal of Management,2017, 43(6): 1940-1965. DOI:10.1177/0149206315573997
15 Mathieu C, Fabi B, Lacoursière R, et al. The role of supervisory behavior, job satisfaction and organizational commitment on employee turnover[J]. Journal of Management & Organization,2016, 22(1): 113-129.
16 Miao C, Qian S S, Ma D L. The relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and firm performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2017, 55(1): 87-107. DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12240
17 Moser K J, Tumasjan A, Welpe I M. Small but attractive: Dimensions of new venture employer attractiveness and the moderating role of applicants’ entrepreneurial behaviors[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2017, 32(5): 588-610. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.05.001
18 Raffiee J, Byun H. Revisiting the portability of performance paradox: Employee mobility and the utilization of human and social capital resources[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2020, 63(1): 34-63. DOI:10.5465/amj.2017.0769
19 Raza S, Azeem M, Humayon A A. The impact of pay satisfaction, job stress, and abusive supervision on turnover intention among banking employees[J]. Sarhad Journal of Management Sciences,2017, 3(2): 272-284. DOI:10.31529/sjms.2017.3.2.7
20 Ritala P, Husted K, Olander H, et al. External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: The downsides of uncontrolled openness[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2018, 22(5): 1104-1123. DOI:10.1108/JKM-05-2017-0172
21 Wang H L, Zhao S, Chen G L. Firm-specific knowledge assets and employment arrangements: Evidence from CEO compensation design and CEO dismissal[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2017, 38(9): 1875-1894. DOI:10.1002/smj.2604
22 Yahaya R, Ebrahim F. Leadership styles and organizational commitment: Literature review[J]. Journal of Management Development,2016, 35(2): 190-216. DOI:10.1108/JMD-01-2015-0004
引用本文
周育彬, 张玉臣, 廖凯诚. 创业叛逃：内涵特征、理论框架及研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(8): 19-37.
导出参考文献，格式为：
