71 
48在人工智能技术深度嵌入组织运行与决策过程的背景下，组织领导者正面临数据滥用、算法偏见、责任模糊等新型伦理难题，相关行为规范体系也亟须重构。通过系统梳理并整合相关理论，本文构建了以“主题识别→双重理性→和则-谐则耦合→动态一致性”为核心的领导力机制框架：首先，提出“主题识别”机制，以揭示技术创新与伦理规范冲突中需要优先协调的价值焦点；其次，提出“双重理性”机制，以阐明在人工智能情境下工具理性与价值理性在创新决策中的权衡逻辑及失衡风险；再次，提出“和则-谐则耦合”机制，以揭示围绕上述主题与决策展开的正式制度、技术规则与伦理规范之间的协同与张力结构；最后，构建“动态一致性”循环调节机制，以说明在人工智能技术持续演进中如何通过反馈与调整保持技术创新实践与社会伦理期待之间的持续契合。换言之，本文试图从问题源头上回应人工智能时代技术创新与伦理责任之间的悖论性挑战，进而为中国情境下重构领导行为规范、优化人工智能驱动组织变革路径以及提升组织的适应性、创新性与长期可持续发展提供了新的理论视角与制度安排依据。
人工智能时代的组织领导力机制探索：技术创新与伦理责任悖论视角
摘要
参考文献
1 高中华, 张恒. 领导AI符号化与员工数字化创造力: 基于认知-情感个性系统理论[J/OL]. 财经论丛, https://doi.org/10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.20251205.001, 2025-12-05.
2 关健, 李文朴, 何国华, 等. 人工智能反馈: 文献述评与研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(3): 83-100.
3 郭小东. 大模型时代全球人工智能治理的挑战与中国方案[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(4): 694-702.
4 李鹏飞, 葛京, 席酉民. 和谐管理视角下的领导研究发展初探[J]. 管理学报, 2014, 11(11): 1591-1600.
5 李鹏飞, 席酉民, 韩巍. 和谐管理理论视角下战略领导力分析[J]. 管理学报, 2013, 10(1): 1-11.
6 林楠, 席酉民, 刘鹏. 产业互联网平台的动态赋能机制研究——以欧冶云商为例[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(9): 135-152.
7 戚聿东, 朱正浩, 赵志栋. 人工智能时代中国管理学学术体系建构[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(7): 172-191.
8 王文龙, 席酉民, 刘鹏. 复杂适应系统理论下数字化领导力的内涵、构成及涌现机制[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 21(4): 475-483,526.
9 王亚刚, 席酉民. 和谐管理理论视角下的战略形成过程: 和谐主题的核心作用[J]. 管理科学学报, 2008, 11(3): 1-15.
10 席酉民, 韩巍, 葛京, 等. 和谐管理理论: 创建可能的新世界[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2025.
11 席酉民, 刘鹏, 孔芳, 等. 和谐管理理论: 起源、启示与前景[J]. 管理工程学报, 2013, 27(2): 1-8.
12 席酉民, 肖宏文, 王洪涛. 和谐管理理论的提出及其原理的新发展[J]. 管理学报, 2005, 2(1): 23-32.
13 席酉民, 熊畅, 刘鹏. 和谐管理理论及其应用述评[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2): 195-209. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.02.016
14 徐鹏, 徐向艺. 人工智能时代企业管理变革的逻辑与分析框架[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(1): 122-129.
15 尹萌, 牛雄鹰. 与AI“共舞”: 系统化视角下的AI-员工协作[J]. 心理科学进展, 2024, 32(1): 162-176. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2024.00162
16 章凯. 领导力的本源与未来[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2024.
17 张梦晓, 刘鹏, 席酉民. 产业互联网情境下企业战略转型路径与机制研究——基于和谐管理理论视角[J]. 管理工程学报, 2024, 38(4): 302-320.
18 张亚莉, 李辽辽, 丁振斌. 组织管理中的人工智能决策: 述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(10): 18-38. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20240712.101
19 张志鑫, 郑晓明. 数字领导力: 结构维度和量表开发[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(11): 152-168. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2023.11.008
20 Shrestha Y R, Krishna V, von Krogh G. Augmenting organizational decision-making with deep learning algorithms: Principles, promises, and challenges[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 123: 588-603. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.068
21 Anderson M H, Sun P Y T. Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full-range’ theory[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2017, 19(1): 76-96. DOI:10.1111/ijmr.12082
22 Aysolmaz B, Müller R, Meacham D. The public perceptions of algorithmic decision-making systems: Results from a large-scale survey[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2023, 79: 101954. DOI:10.1016/j.tele.2023.101954
23 Aziz M F, Rajesh J I, Jahan F, et al. AI-powered leadership: A systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2025, 40(5): 604-630. DOI:10.1108/JMP-05-2024-0389
24 Bacharach S B. Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4): 496-515. DOI:10.2307/258555
25 Bass B M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations[M]. New York: Free Press, 1985.
26 Bevilacqua S, Masárová J, Perotti F A, et al. Enhancing top managers’leadership with artificial intelligence: Insights from a systematic literature review[J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2025, 19(9): 2899-2935. DOI:10.1007/s11846-025-00836-7
27 Breidbach C F. Responsible algorithmic decision-making[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 2024, 53(2): 101031. DOI:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2024.101031
28 Brown M E, Treviño L K. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17(6): 595-616. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
29 Cyert R M, March J G. A behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
30 Denison D R, Hooijberg R, Quinn R E. Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership[J]. Organization Science, 1995, 6(5): 524-540. DOI:10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
31 Edmondson A C, McManus S E. Methodological fit in management field research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4): 1246-1264.
32 Fischer T, Sitkin S B. Leadership styles: A comprehensive assessment and way forward[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2023, 17(1): 331-372. DOI:10.5465/annals.2020.0340
33 Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, et al. AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations[J]. Minds and Machines, 2018, 28(4): 689-707. DOI:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
34 Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(1): 15-31. DOI:10.1177/1094428112452151
35 Graen G B, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1995, 6(2): 219-247. DOI:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
36 Hossain S, Fernando M, Akter S. Digital leadership: Towards a dynamic managerial capability perspective of artificial intelligence-driven leader capabilities[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2025, 32(2): 189-208. DOI:10.1177/15480518251319624
37 Jorzik P, Yigit A, Kanbach DK, et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled business model innovation: Competencies and roles of top management[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2024, 71: 7044-7056. DOI:10.1109/TEM.2023.3275643
38 Kellogg K C, Valentine M A, Christin A. Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(1): 366-410. DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0174
39 Kögel D, Meile S, Canos-Daros L. Who’s steering whom and in what direction? An experiment on AI versus top management decision-making in projects[J]. Project Management Journal, 2026, 57(2): 205-221. DOI:10.1177/87569728251379338
40 Leavitt K, Barnes C M, Shapiro D L. The role of human managers within algorithmic performance management systems: A process model of employee trust in managers through reflexivity[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2025, 50(4): 745-767. DOI:10.5465/amr.2022.0058
41 Lewis M W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(4): 760-776. DOI:10.2307/259204
42 Maak T, Pless N M. Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society–a relational perspective[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2006, 66(1): 99-115. DOI:10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z
43 March J G, Olsen J P. Ambiguity and choice in organizations[M]. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1979.
44 Mikalef P, Conboy K, Lundström J E, et al. Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2022, 31(3): 257-268. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2022.2026621
45 Noponen N, Auvinen T, Sajasalo P. The search for authenticity in artificial-intelligence-enhanced leadership[A]. In: Turcan R V, Reilly J E, Mølbjerg K, et al. The emerald handbook of authentic leadership[M]. Leeds: Emerald Publishing, 2023.
46 Papagiannidis E, Mikalef P, Conboy K. Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2025, 34(2): 101885. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101885
47 Raisch S, Krakowski S. Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46(1): 192-210. DOI:10.5465/amr.2018.0072
48 Senge P M. The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization[M]. New York: Doubleday, 2006.
49 Shepherd D A, Suddaby R. Theory building: A review and integration[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(1): 59-86. DOI:10.1177/0149206316647102
50 Shin D, Park Y J. Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019, 98: 277-284. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.019
51 Smith W K, Lewis M W. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(2): 381-403. DOI:10.5465/amr.2011.59330958
52 Strohmeier S, Becker M, Scheer-Weller E. Beyond aversion–principles of appropriate algorithmic decision-making in human resource management[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2026, 296: 128954. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128954
53 Suddaby R. Editor's comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2010, 35(3): 346-357. DOI:10.5465/amr.2010.51141319
54 Tsai C Y, Marshall J D, Choudhury A, et al. Human-robot collaboration: A multilevel and integrated leadership framework[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2022, 33(1): 101594. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101594
55 Tsoukas H, Chia R. On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(5): 567-582. DOI:10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
56 Van Quaquebeke N, Gerpott F H. The now, new, and next of digital leadership: How artificial intelligence (AI) will take over and change leadership as we know it[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2023, 30(3): 265-275. DOI:10.1177/15480518231181731
57 Weber M. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
58 Yukl G A, Gardner W L. Leadership in organizations[M]. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2020.
59 Zhang Y, Waldman D A, Han Y L, et al. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58(2): 538-566. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
引用本文
王文龙, 孔佳南, 席酉民, 等. 人工智能时代的组织领导力机制探索：技术创新与伦理责任悖论视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(7): 22-40.
导出参考文献，格式为：
