刻板印象：女性创新者在技术创新中的威胁抑或机会？ -- 上海财经大学期刊社

9 Ansari S, Reinecke J, Spaan A. How are practices made to vary? Managing practice adaptation in a multinational corporation[J]. Organization Studies, 2014, 35（9）: 1313–1341. DOI:10.1177/0170840614539310

10 Bell A E, Spencer S J, Iserman E, et al. Stereotype threat and women’s performance in engineering[J]. Journal of Engineering Education, 2003, 92（4）: 307–312. DOI:10.1002/jee.2003.92.issue-4

11 Biernat M, Fuegen K. Shifting standards and the evaluation of competence: Complexity in gender-based judgment and decision making[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2001, 57（4）: 707–724. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00237

12 Biernat M, Sesko A K. Evaluating the contributions of members of mixed-sex work teams: Race and gender matter[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 49（3）: 471–476. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.008

13 Brescoll V L, Dawson E, Uhlmann E L. Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations[J]. Psychological Science, 2010, 21（11）: 1640–1642. DOI:10.1177/0956797610384744

14 Brescoll V L, Uhlmann E L. Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace[J]. Psychological Science, 2008, 19（3）: 268–275. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02079.x

15 Brescoll V L. Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2011, 56（4）: 622–641. DOI:10.1177/0001839212439994

16 Carr P B, Steele C M. Stereotype threat affects financial decision making[J]. Psychological Science, 2010, 21（10）: 1411–1416. DOI:10.1177/0956797610384146

17 Carr P B, Steele C M. Stereotype threat and inflexible perseverance in problem solving[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009, 45（4）: 853–859. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.003

18 Cohen G L, Garcia J. Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications[J]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2008, 17（6）: 365–369. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x

19 DiTomaso N, Post C, Smith D R, et al. Effects of structural position on allocation and evaluation decisions for scientists and engineers in industrial R&D[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2007, 52（2）: 175–207. DOI:10.2189/asqu.52.2.175

20 Eagly A H, Karau S J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders[J]. Psychological Review, 2002, 109（3）: 573–598. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

21 Fitzsimmons T W, Callan V J, Paulsen N. Gender disparity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top?[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25（2）: 245–266. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.005

22 Foschi M. Double standards for competence: Theory and research[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2000, 26: 21–42. DOI:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21

23 Glick P, Fiske S T. The Ambivalence toward men inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men[J]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1999, 23（3）: 519–536. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00379.x

24 Good C, Aronson J, Harder J A. Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses[J]. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2008, 29（1）: 17–28. DOI:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004

25 Heilman M E. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2001, 57（4）: 657–674. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00234

26 Heilman M E. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2012, 32: 113–135. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003

27 Heilman M E, Okimoto T G. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92（1）: 81–92. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81

28 Heilman M E, Wallen A S, Fuchs D, et al. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89（3）: 416–427. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416

29 Hoyt C L, Murphy S E. Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2016, 27（3）: 387–399. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.002

30 Inzlicht M, Ben-Zeev T. A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males[J]. Psychological Science, 2000, 11（5）: 365–371. DOI:10.1111/1467-9280.00272

31 Johnson S K, Sitzmann T, Nguyen A T. Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Acknowledging appearance mitigates the " beauty is beastly” effect[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2014, 125（2）: 184–192. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.006

32 Joshi A, Son J, Roh H. When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 58（5）: 1516–1545. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0721

33 Lammers J, Galinsky A D, Gordijn E H, et al. Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach[J]. Psychological Science, 2008, 19（6）: 558–564. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02123.x

34 Livingston R W, Rosette A S, Washington E F. Can an agentic black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders[J]. Psychological Science, 2012, 23（4）: 354–358. DOI:10.1177/0956797611428079

35 Logel C, Walton G M, Spencer S J, et al. Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2009, 96（6）: 1089–1103. DOI:10.1037/a0015703

36 Lyness K S, Thompson D E. Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route?[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85（1）: 86–101. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.86

37 Marx D M, Stapel D A, Muller D. We can do it: The interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 88（3）: 432–446. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.432

38 McGlone M S, Pfiester R A. Stereotype threat and the evaluative context of communication[J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2015, 34（2）: 111–137. DOI:10.1177/0261927X14562609

39 Owen R, Macnaghten P, Stilgoe J. Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society[J]. Science and Public Policy, 2012, 39（6）: 751–760. DOI:10.1093/scipol/scs093

40 Parks-Stamm E J, Heilman M E, Hearns K A. Motivated to penalize: Women’s strategic rejection of successful women[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008, 34（2）: 237–247. DOI:10.1177/0146167207310027

41 Paustian-Underdahl S C, Walker L S, Woehr D J. Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2014, 99（6）: 1129–1145. DOI:10.1037/a0036751

42 Perel M. One point of view: Corporate courage: Breaking the barrier to innovation[J]. Research-Technology Management, 2002, 45（3）: 9–17.

43 Phelan J E, Moss-Racusin C A, Rudman L A. Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women[J]. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2008, 32（4）: 406–413. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00454.x

44 Purdie-Vaughns V, Steele C M, Davies P G, et al. Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, 94（4）: 615–630. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615

45 Rudman L A, Glick P. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2001, 57（4）: 743–762. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00239

46 Rudman L A, Kilianski S E. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 26（11）: 1315–1328. DOI:10.1177/0146167200263001

47 Rudman L A, Moss-Racusin C A, Phelan J E, et al. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012, 48（1）: 165–179. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008

48 Rudman L A, Phelan J E. Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2008, 28: 61–79. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003

49 Ryan M K, Haslam S A. The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over‐represented in precarious leadership positions[J]. British Journal of Management, 2005, 16（2）: 81–90. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2005.16.issue-2

50 Schmader T. Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2002, 38（2）: 194–201. DOI:10.1006/jesp.2001.1500

51 Shapiro J R, Neuberg S L. From stereotype threat to stereotype threats: Implications of a multi-threat framework for causes, moderators, mediators, consequences, and interventions[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2007, 11（2）: 107–130. DOI:10.1177/1088868306294790

52 Shapiro J R, Williams A M. The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields[J]. Sex Roles, 2012, 66（3–4）: 175–183. DOI:10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0

53 Smith P K, Jost J T, Vijay R. Legitimacy crisis? Behavioral approach and inhibition when power differences are left unexplained[J]. Social Justice Research, 2008, 21（3）: 358–376. DOI:10.1007/s11211-008-0077-9

54 Steele J R, Ambady N. " Math is Hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2006, 42（4）: 428–436. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003

55 Vial A C, Napier J L, Brescoll V L. A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2016, 27（3）: 400–414. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.004

56 Walton G M, Cohen G L. A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92（1）: 82–96. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82