3675 
7188性别议题是组织与管理研究中的前沿领域，旨在探讨工作场所中的女性由于生理和社会性别差异对组织中各种绩效指标的影响。本研究将管理学国际期刊中发表的与性别议题相关的文献作为文献池，通过对文献的计量分析发现，现有文献并未以理论研究、管理问题等进行集群，而是以某一类特定的女性角色或女性特点来形成文献簇。本文根据文献内容分析，将女性形象提炼为差异的、隐匿的、矛盾的、孤立的和渺小的五种类型，并分别对其对应的性别议题和理论解释进行梳理。女性形象的测度方式包括差异比较、性别匹配分析、性别转换分析和性别比例分析。本文主要用“问题围绕形象、理论围绕问题”的方式回溯相关研究成果，从而以女性形象为线索，有效解决了当前管理学性别研究中多理论交叉、不同研究议题之间相互独立的问题，使得多样化的性别研究之间建立起包容性对话。结合性别研究的高度社会建构和社会嵌入属性，未来的研究需要充分重视女性角色、地位和形象变化的新社会现象，包括女性经济赋权问题、新经济催生出的新职业类型对女性的影响，并重点关注组织边界之外的关键制度性障碍，尤其是非政府组织、媒体或政府行为在组织内部带来变革的策略。
管理研究中的女性形象——基于管理学国际期刊的文献分析
摘要
参考文献
1 陈悦, 陈超美, 刘则渊, 等. CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J]. 科学学研究,2015, (2): 242-253. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2015.02.009
4 李海, 姚蕾, 张勉, 等. 工作—家庭冲突交叉效应的性别差异[J]. 南开管理评论,2017, (4): 153-164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2017.04.015
6 刘永丽. 管理者团队中垂直对特征影响会计稳健性的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2014, (2): 107-116, 128. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2014.02.012
7 潘安成, 肖宇佳. “家和万事兴”: 夫妻关系维持与日常创业行为的探索性研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2017, (5): 56-68. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2017.05.006
9 吴欣桐, 陈劲. 创新管理范式的解构与重塑——性别化的视角解析[J]. 科学学研究,2019, (9): 1671-1679, 1693. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2019.09.016
10 吴欣桐, 陈劲, 梁琳. 性别化创新的分析逻辑——科学研究中的性与性别分析法[J]. 科学学研究,2018, (9): 1659-1667. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2018.09.016
12 徐淑英, 李绪红, 贾良定, 等. 负责任的管理研究: 哲学与实践[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2018.
13 Adams R B, Ferreira D. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2009, 94(2): 291-309. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
14 Ahl H. Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2006, 30(5): 595-621. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x
15 Aldrich H E, Kenworthy A L. The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings[A]. Baum J A C, McKelvey B. Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell[C]. Washington: Sage Publications, Inc., 1999.
16 Barnett F, Barnett S. Working together: Entrepreneurial couples[M]. Berkeley: Ten Speed Press, 1988.
18 Bird B, Brush C. A gendered perspective on organizational creation[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2002, 26(3): 41-65. DOI:10.1177/104225870202600303
19 Briscoe F, Joshi A. Bringing the boss’s politics in: Supervisor political ideology and the gender gap in earnings[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017, 60(4): 1415-1441. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0179
20 Broadbridge A, Simpson R. 25 years on: Reflecting on the past and looking to the future in gender and management research[J]. British Journal of Management,2011, 22(3): 470-483. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00758.x
22 Craig L, Powell A. Non-standard work schedules, work-family balance and the gendered division of childcare[J]. Work, Employment and Society,2011, 25(2): 274-291. DOI:10.1177/0950017011398894
23 Craig L, Powell A, Cortis N. Self-employment, work-family time and the gender division of labour[J]. Work, Employment and Society,2012, 26(5): 716-734. DOI:10.1177/0950017012451642
25 Dezsö C L, Ross D G. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2012, 33(9): 1072-1089. DOI:10.1002/smj.1955
26 Eagly A H. The science and politics of comparing women and men[J]. American Psychologist,1995, 50(3): 145-158. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.145
27 Eagly A H. Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions[J]. Psychology of Women Quarterly,2007, 31(1): 1-12. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x
28 Eagly A H, Carli L L. The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2003a, 14(6): 807-834. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004
29 Eagly A H, Carli L L. Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2003b, 14(6): 851-859. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.003
30 Eagly A H, Johannesen-Schmidt M C. The leadership styles of women and men[J]. Journal of Social Issues,2001, 57(4): 781-797. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00241
31 Eagly A H, Johannesen-Schmidt M C, Van Engen M L. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2003, 129(4): 569-591. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
32 Eagly A H, Karau S J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders[J]. Psychological Review,2002, 109(3): 573-598. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
33 Eagly A H, Makhijani M G, Klonsky B G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1992, 111(1): 3-22. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3
34 Ely R, Padavic I. A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007, 32(4): 1121-1143. DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.26585842
35 Fiol C M, Pratt M G, O’Connor E J. Managing intractable identity conflicts[J]. Academy of Management Review,2009, 34(1): 32-55. DOI:10.5465/amr.2009.35713276
36 Flynn M. Who would delay retirement? Typologies of older workers[J]. Personnel Review,2010, 39(3): 308-324. DOI:10.1108/00483481011030511
37 Ford J, Collinson D. In search of the perfect manager? Work-life balance and managerial work[J]. Work, Employment and Society,2011, 25(2): 257-273. DOI:10.1177/0950017011398895
40 Greenhaus J H, Beutell N J. Sources of conflict between work and family roles[J]. Academy of Management Review,1985, 10(1): 76-88. DOI:10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
41 Greenhaus J H, Powell G N. When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment[J]. Academy of Management Review,2006, 31(1): 72-92. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
42 Gregory-Smith I, Main B G M, O’Reilly Ⅲ C A. Appointments, pay and performance in UK boardrooms by gender[J]. The Economic Journal,2014, 124(574): F109-F128. DOI:10.1111/ecoj.12102
43 Haslam S A, Reicher S D, Platow M J. The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power[M]. New York: Psychology Press, 2010.
45 Heilman M E. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior,2012, 32: 113-135. DOI:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
46 Heilman M E, Okimoto T G. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2007, 92(1): 81-92. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
47 Hughes K D, Jennings J E, Brush C, et al. Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2012, 36(3): 429-442. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00504.x
48 Joshi A, Neely B, Emrich C, et al. Gender research in AMJ: An overview of five decades of empirical research and calls to action[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(5): 1459-1475. DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.4011
49 Jyrkinen M, McKie L. Gender, age and ageism: Experiences of women managers in Finland and Scotland[J]. Work, Employment and Society,2012, 26(1): 61-77. DOI:10.1177/0950017011426313
50 Knouse S B, Webb S C. Virtual networking for women and minorities[J]. Career Development International,2001, 6(4): 226-229. DOI:10.1108/13620430110397541
51 Koenig A M, Eagly A H, Mitchell A A, et al. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2011, 137(4): 616-642. DOI:10.1037/a0023557
52 Linehan M, Walsh J S. Work-family conflict and the senior female international manager[J]. British Journal of Management,2000, 11(S1): S49-S58. DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.11.s1.5
53 Lowe K B, Kroeck K G, Sivasubramaniam N. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,1996, 7(3): 385-425. DOI:10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90027-2
54 Marlow S, Patton D. All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2005, 29(6): 717-735. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00105.x
55 McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,2001, 27(1): 415-444. DOI:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
56 Moore S. “No matter what I did I would still end up in the same position”: Age as a factor defining older women’s experience of labour market participation[J]. Work, Employment and Society,2009, 23(4): 655-671. DOI:10.1177/0950017009344871
57 Murray F, Graham L. Buying science and selling science: Gender differences in the market for commercial science[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2007, 16(4): 657-689. DOI:10.1093/icc/dtm021
58 Ozgen E, Baron R A. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2007, 22(2): 174-192. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.12.001
59 Parker M, Welch E W. Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2013, 24(2): 332-348. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.001
60 Peni E, Vähämaa S. Female executives and earnings management[J]. Managerial Finance,2010, 36(7): 629-645. DOI:10.1108/03074351011050343
61 Pio E, Essers C. Professional migrant women decentring otherness: A transnational perspective[J]. British Journal of Management,2014, 25(2): 252-265. DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.12003
63 Powell G N, Butterfield D A, Parent J D. Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?[J]. Journal of Management,2002, 28(2): 177-193. DOI:10.1177/014920630202800203
64 Powell G N, Greenhaus J H. Sex, gender, and decisions at the family→work interface[J]. Journal of Management,2010a, 36(4): 1011-1039. DOI:10.1177/0149206309350774
65 Powell G N, Greenhaus J H. Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2010b, 53(3): 513-534. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.51468647
66 Ridgeway C L. Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
67 Ridgeway C L, Smith-Lovin L. The gender system and interaction[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1999, 25(1): 191-216. DOI:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.191
69 Rosette A S, Tost L P. Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2010, 95(2): 221-235. DOI:10.1037/a0018204
70 Sandberg S. Lean in-women, work and the will to lead[J]. NHRD Network Journal,2015, 8(2): 137-139. DOI:10.1177/0974173920150225
71 Sarah C, Mona L K. Critical mass theory and women’s political representation[J]. Political Studies,2008, 56(3): 725-736. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00712.x
72 Scott B A, Barnes C M. A multilevel field investigation of emotional labor, affect, work withdrawal, and gender[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011, 54(1): 116-136. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.59215086
73 Shelton L M. Female entrepreneurs, work-family conflict, and venture performance: New insights into the work-family interface[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2006, 44(2): 285-297. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00168.x
74 Sila V, Gonzalez A, Hagendorff J. Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk?[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2016, 36: 26-53. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003
75 Solal I, Snellman K. Women don’t mean business? Gender penalty in board composition[J]. Organization Science,2019, 30(6): 1270-1288. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2019.1301
76 Thursby J G, Thursby M C. Gender patterns of research and licensing activity of science and engineering faculty[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer,2005, 30(4): 343-353. DOI:10.1007/s10961-005-2580-6
77 Vecchio R P. In search of gender advantage[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2003, 14(6): 835-850. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.005
78 Venkatesh V, Shaw J D, Sykes T A, et al. Networks, technology, and entrepreneurship: A field quasi-experiment among women in rural India[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017, 60(5): 1709-1740. DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.0849
79 Viejola S. Metaphors of mixed team play[J]. International Review for the Sociology of Sport,1994, 29(1): 31-48. DOI:10.1177/101269029402900105
80 Walters J, McNeely C L. Recasting title Ⅸ: Addressing gender equity in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professoriate[J]. Review of Policy Research,2010, 27(3): 317-332. DOI:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00444.x
81 Wang M Z, Kelan E. The gender quota and female leadership: Effects of the Norwegian gender quota on board chairs and CEOs[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2013, 117(3): 449-466. DOI:10.1007/s10551-012-1546-5
82 Zhang Y, Qu H Y. The impact of CEO succession with gender change on firm performance and successor early departure: Evidence from China’s publicly listed companies in 1997-2010[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(5): 1845-1868. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0176
83 Zhao E Y, Wry T. Not all inequality is equal: Deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(6): 1994-2020. DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.0476
引用本文
吴欣桐, 陈劲, 朱子钦. 管理研究中的女性形象——基于管理学国际期刊的文献分析[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(11): 64-80.
导出参考文献，格式为：
