随着数字时代的来临,欧盟于2019年出台了重量级的竞争政策《数字时代的竞争政策》。而互联网领域的相关市场界定在学术界和实务界一直存在着争鸣,从基本理论到司法案例,相关市场理论面临着较大的机遇与挑战。为此,文章试图对相关市场理论的历史演进与发展前沿进行系统梳理,重点分析从传统时代的单边市场到数字时代的双边市场的理论跃进,从而为今后的学术研究和执法实践提供理论支撑与实践参考。研究发现:(1)相关市场理论在反垄断经济执法中至关重要,虽然部分学者倡导弱化市场界定,但目前在大多数情况下相关市场界定仍然可以是反垄断执法分析的起点。(2)数字经济所具有的双边市场特性给相关市场带来了理论与实践挑战,传统的单边市场分析方法不能直接应用于数字经济的反垄断研究。(3)学界对双边市场下的相关市场理论进行了广泛研究,但仍有待深化,目前理论研究和实证分析均存在诸多不足,国内学者应积极投身其中。
数字时代中的相关市场理论:从单边市场到双边市场
摘要
参考文献
3 陈林. 自然垄断与混合所有制改革−基于自然实验与成本函数的分析[J]. 经济研究,2018,(1):81−96. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5719.2018.01.074
4 陈林. 公平竞争审查、反垄断法与行政性垄断[J]. 学术研究,2019,(1):106−113. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7326.2019.01.015
7 李虹,张昕竹. 相关市场的认定与发展及对中国反垄断执法的借鉴[J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2009,(5):31−36. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2009.05.005
11 Affeldt P,Filistrucchi L,Klein T J. Upward pricing pressure in two-sided markets:Corrigendum[J]. The Economic Journal,2018,128(610): 1331−1332. DOI:10.1111/ecoj.12597
12 Argentesi E,Filistrucchi L. Estimating market power in a two-sided market:The case of newspapers[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics,2007,22(7): 1247−1266. DOI:10.1002/jae.997
13 Argentesi E, Ivaldi M. Market definition in the printed media industry: Theory and practice[R]. CEPR Working Paper No.5096, 2005.
14 Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics,2006,37(3): 668−691. DOI:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
15 Broos S,Ramos J M. Competing business models and two-sidedness:An application to the Google shopping case[J]. The Antitrust Bulletin,2017,62(2): 382−399. DOI:10.1177/0003603X17708358
19 Danger K L,Frech III H E. Critical thinking about “critical loss” in antitrust[J]. The Antitrust Bulletin,2001,46(2): 339−355. DOI:10.1177/0003603X0104600204
23 Evans D S, Noel M D. Defining markets that involve multi-sided platform businesses: An empirical framework with an application to Google’s purchase of DoubleClick[R]. Regulation & Markets Center Working Paper No.07-18, 2007.
25 Evans D S. Essential principles for the design of antitrust analysis for multisided platforms[R]. SSRN Working Paper No.3261812, 2018.
26 Farrell J, Shapiro C. Improving critical loss analysis[R]. Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt0ff249px, 2007.
31 Filistrucchi L. A SSNIP test for two-sided markets: The case of media[R]. NET Institute Working Paper No.08-34, 2008.
33 Fu X, Ju H. Anti-monopoly cases on unfair pricing in China[A]. Katsoulacos Y, Jenny F. Excessive pricing and competi- tion law enforcement[M]. Cham: Springer, 2018: 211-229.
35 Hartman R,Teece D,Mitchell W,et al. Assessing market power in regimes of rapid technological change[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,1993,2(3): 317−350. DOI:10.1093/icc/2.3.317
36 Ju H,Tan G F. Bilateral market structures and regulatory policies in international telephone markets[J]. International Economic Review,2016,57(2): 393−424. DOI:10.1111/iere.12162
37 Katz M L,Shapiro C. Critical loss:Let’s tell the whole story[J]. Antitrust,Spring,2003,17(2): 49−56.
38 Langenfeld J,Li W Q. Critical loss analysis in evaluating mergers[J]. The Antitrust Bulletin,2001,46(2): 299−337. DOI:10.1177/0003603X0104600203
41 Régibeau P. A comment on Evans,Hagiu and Schmalensee[J]. CESifo Economic Studies,2005,51(2−3): 225−232. DOI:10.1093/cesifo/51.2-3.225
42 Rochet J C,Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association,2003,1(4): 990−1029. DOI:10.1162/154247603322493212
44 Tremblay M J. Market power and mergers in multi-sided markets[R]. SSRN Working Paper No.2972701, 2018.
引用本文
陈林, 张家才. 数字时代中的相关市场理论:从单边市场到双边市场[J]. 财经研究, 2020, 46(3): 109-123.
导出参考文献,格式为:
下一篇:融资约束、人工智能与经济增长