4268 
3821数字技术的迅猛发展促使商业环境复杂性、易变性和不确定性特征愈发彰显，企业数字化转型面临重大挑战。数字化转型是企业通过数字技术实现重大业务改进，其本质是一个持续试错的过程，而高管决策逻辑是企业数字化转型的起点。本文根据效果推理理论，从过程视角揭示了决策逻辑对企业数字化转型绩效的影响路径。研究发现：因果决策逻辑和效果决策逻辑都可以通过失败学习提升企业数字化转型绩效；当环境动态性程度较低时，两种决策逻辑对失败学习的作用效果相差无几，但是随着环境动态性的提高，效果决策逻辑的优势逐渐凸显。本文将效果推理理论延伸至数字化转型的研究情境，一方面有助于丰富和发展企业数字化转型管理创新的理论研究，另一方面有助于理解和指导中国企业实现数字化转型。
决策逻辑、失败学习与企业数字化转型绩效
摘要
参考文献
1 蔡莉, 杨亚倩, 卢珊, 等. 数字技术对创业活动影响研究回顾与展望[J]. 科学学研究,2019, 37(10): 1816-1824, 1835. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2019.10.011
3 陈逢文, 付龙望, 张露, 等. 创业者个体学习、组织学习如何交互影响企业创新行为?——基于整合视角的纵向单案例研究[J]. 管理世界,2020, 36(3): 142-164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.03.010
4 陈国权, 王晓辉. 组织学习与组织绩效: 环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 研究与发展管理,2012, 24(1): 52-59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8308.2012.01.008
9 秦远建, 汪文祥. 不确定性容忍度、决策逻辑与突破式创新关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020, 37(2): 1-9. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2019040890
13 徐平磊, 贾迎亚, 于晓宇. 效果推理、创业团队凝聚力与新产品开发绩效[J]. 管理学报,2020, 17(2): 251-258. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2020.02.011
17 郑馨, 周先波, 陈宏辉, 等. 东山再起: 怎样的国家制度设计能够促进失败再创业?——基于56个国家7年混合数据的证据[J]. 管理世界,2019, 35(7): 136-151, 181. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.07.012
18 朱秀梅, 林晓玥, 王天东. 数字创业生态系统动态演进机理——基于杭州云栖小镇的案例研究[J]. 管理学报,2020, b, 17(4): 487-497. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2020.04.002
20 Amit R, Han X. Value creation through novel resource configurations in a digitally enabled world[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2017, 11(3): 228-242. DOI:10.1002/sej.1256
21 Andriole S J. Five myths about digital transformation[M]. Cambridge: MIT Sloan Management Review, 2017.
22 Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas L D M, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2018, 12(1): 72-95. DOI:10.1002/sej.1266
23 Bledow R, Carette B, Kuehnel J, et al. Learning from others’ failures: The effectiveness of failure stories for managerial learning[J]. Academy of Management Learning and Education,2017, 16(1): 39-53. DOI:10.5465/amle.2014.0169
24 Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, et al. Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R& D project performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2012, 27(2): 167-184. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
26 Cai L, Guo R P, Fei Y P, et al. Effectuation, exploratory learning and new venture performance: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2017, 55(3): 388-403. DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12247
27 Chandler G N, DeTienne D R, McKelvie A, et al. Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2011, 26(3): 375-390. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
29 Dew N, Read S, Sarasvathy S D, et al. Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(4): 287-309. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
30 Dutta D K, Gwebu K L, Wang J. Personal innovativeness in technology, related knowledge and experience, and entrepreneurial intentions in emerging technology industries: A process of causation or effectuation?[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,2015, 11(3): 529-555. DOI:10.1007/s11365-013-0287-y
31 Fitzgerald M, Kruschwitz N, Bonnet D, et al. Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative[J]. IT Sloan Management Review,2014, 55(2): 1-12.
32 García-Morales V J, Verdú-Jover A J, Lloréns F J. The influence of CEO perceptions on the level of organizational learning: Single-loop and double-loop learning[J]. International Journal of Manpower,2009, 30(6): 567-590. DOI:10.1108/01437720910988984
33 Kohli R, Melville N P. Digital innovation: A review and synthesis[J]. Information Systems Journal,2019, 29(1): 200-223. DOI:10.1111/isj.12193
34 Lichtenthaler U. Shared value innovation: Linking competitiveness and societal goals in the context of digital transformation[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management,2017, 14(4): 1750018. DOI:10.1142/S0219877017500183
35 Lichtenthaler U. Building blocks of successful digital transformation: Complementing technology and market issues[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management,2020, 17(1): 2050004. DOI:10.1142/S0219877020500042
36 Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly,2017, 41(1): 223-238. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
37 Nummela N, Saarenketo S, Jokela P, et al. Strategic decision-making of a born global: A comparative study from three small open economies[J]. Management International Review,2014, 54(4): 527-550. DOI:10.1007/s11575-014-0211-x
38 Parker S K, Williams H M, Turner N. Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology,2006, 91(3): 636-652. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
39 Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Lee J Y, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J]. The Journal of Applied Psychology,2003, 88(5): 879-903. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
40 Read S, Sarasvathy S, Dew N, et al. Unreasonable assumptions in ASB[J]. Academy of Management Review,2015.
41 Roach D C, Ryman J A, Makani J. Effectuation, innovation and performance in SMEs: An empirical study[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management,2016, 19(2): 214-238. DOI:10.1108/EJIM-12-2014-0119
42 Sarasvathy S D. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001, 26(2): 243-263. DOI:10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
43 Sarasvathy S D. Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise[M]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008.
44 Sarasvathy S D, Dew N. New market creation through transformation[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2005, 15(5): 533-565. DOI:10.1007/s00191-005-0264-x
45 Sarasvathy S D, Menon A R, Kuechle G. Failing firms and successful entrepreneurs: Serial entrepreneurship as a temporal portfolio[J]. Small Business Economics,2013, 40(2): 417-434. DOI:10.1007/s11187-011-9412-x
46 Schilke O. On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2014, 35(2): 179-203. DOI:10.1002/smj.2099
47 Shepherd D A, Wiklund J, Haynie J M. Moving forward: Balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(2): 134-148. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.10.002
49 Smolka K M, Verheul I, Burmeister-Lamp K, et al. Get it together! Synergistic effects of causal and effectual decision-making logics on venture performance[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2018, 42(4): 571-604. DOI:10.1177/1042258718783429
50 Tahirsylaj A S. Stimulating creativity and innovation through Intelligent Fast Failure[J]. Thinking Skills and Creativity,2012, 7(3): 265-270. DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.005
51 Vassilakopoulou P, Grisot M. Effectual tactics in digital intrapreneurship: A process model[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2020, 29(3): 101617. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101617
52 Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2019, 28(2): 118-144. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
53 Wang W Z, Yang C, Wang B, et al. When error learning orientation leads to learning from project failure: The moderating role of fear of face loss[J]. Frontiers in Psychology,2019, 10: 1317. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01317
54 Warner K S R, Wäger M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning,2019, 52(3): 326-349. DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
55 Xu Y Q, Koivumäki T. Digital business model effectuation: An agile approach[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2019, 95: 307-314. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.021
57 Yu X Y, Tao Y D, Tao X M, et al. Managing uncertainty in emerging economies: The interaction effects between causation and effectuation on firm performance[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018, 135: 121-131. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.017
引用本文
卢艳秋, 赵彬, 宋昶. 决策逻辑、失败学习与企业数字化转型绩效[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(9): 68-82.
导出参考文献，格式为：
