韩国三星集团的后来居上及其启示
5022 
0
外国经济与管理 2005 年 第 27 卷第 05 期, 页码：59 - 65
摘要
参考文献
摘要
最近10年来,三星集团取得了异乎寻常的成就———从众多竞争对手中崛起成为韩国规模最大、最有影响的企业,2002 年和2003 年连续在《商业周刊》“全球IT 公司100强”中名列前茅。三星走过了一条由“以量取胜”到“以质取胜”的“高端化”成功道路。三星的成功对于我国企业的战略成长和发展,具有颇多的启迪意义。
[1]FortuneGlobal500[J]FortuneMagazine,1995-08-07
[2]FortuneGlobal500[J]FortuneMagazine,2003-07-07
[3]FortuneGlobal500[J]FortuneMagazine,2004-07-12
[4]SamsungSamsung press information[R]SamsungGroup,2004:1-2
[5]IanRowleyGlobal1000[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-08-02
[6]SamsungAnnual report2003[R]SamsungGroup,2004,(May)
[7]SamsungSamsung at a glance[E]SamsungGroup http://www samsung com/AboutSAMSUNG/index htm
[8]SamsungCorporate identity[R]SamsungGroup,2005,(Mar)
[9]DianeBrady,RobertD Hof,AndyReinhardt,MoonIhlwan,StanleyHolmes,KerryCapellThe top100 brands[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-08-02
[10]DavidRocks,MoonIhlwanSamsung design[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-11-09
[11]SamsungFrequently asked questions(FAQ) aboutSamsung[R]2003,SamsungGroup:1
[12]SamsungBoard composition[R]Provided bySamsungElectronics
[13]BusinessWeekThe best& worst managers of2003[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-01-12
[2]FortuneGlobal500[J]FortuneMagazine,2003-07-07
[3]FortuneGlobal500[J]FortuneMagazine,2004-07-12
[4]SamsungSamsung press information[R]SamsungGroup,2004:1-2
[5]IanRowleyGlobal1000[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-08-02
[6]SamsungAnnual report2003[R]SamsungGroup,2004,(May)
[7]SamsungSamsung at a glance[E]SamsungGroup http://www samsung com/AboutSAMSUNG/index htm
[8]SamsungCorporate identity[R]SamsungGroup,2005,(Mar)
[9]DianeBrady,RobertD Hof,AndyReinhardt,MoonIhlwan,StanleyHolmes,KerryCapellThe top100 brands[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-08-02
[10]DavidRocks,MoonIhlwanSamsung design[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-11-09
[11]SamsungFrequently asked questions(FAQ) aboutSamsung[R]2003,SamsungGroup:1
[12]SamsungBoard composition[R]Provided bySamsungElectronics
[13]BusinessWeekThe best& worst managers of2003[J]BusinessWeekMagazine,2004-01-12
引用本文
王志平. 韩国三星集团的后来居上及其启示[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2005, 27(5): 59–65.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：西方企业员工福利满意度研究述评
下一篇：西方学者对非市场的研究及其评价
