, 2
23808 
8583领导替代理论是在路径—目标理论的基础上发展起来的用于解释领导行为与结果变量权变关系的理论框架，并通过突出情境因素的重要性与领导权变理论区别开来。该理论在提出后的几十年中，并未得到实证研究的广泛证实；同时，有限的实证研究也存在诸多缺陷，尚不足以否定该理论的意义。进入新世纪，随着组织扁平化与个体自我意识的觉醒，仅靠正式领导已无法充分激发个体、团队活力，领导替代理论也由此得到学者们的广泛关注。本文系统回顾了领导替代理论的发展、与以往领导理论的区别以及核心观点，总结了早期实证研究的不足，以便对领导替代理论有更清晰的认识。此外，本文系统归纳了当前实证研究探究的领导替代因素，以期为后续领导影响边界条件的识别与替代因素选择提供参考。未来可以从拓展领导层次、细化领导替代因素的作用类型、构建新型指导性框架、探索不同替代因素之间的协同效果等方面进一步深化与发展领导替代理论。
领导替代理论前沿述评与展望
摘要
参考文献
15 Avolio B J, Walumbwa F O, Weber T J. Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 60: 421–49.
16 Biswas S. HR practices as a mediator between organizational culture and transformational leadership: Implications for employee performance[J]. Psychological Studies, 2009, 54（2）: 114–123. DOI:10.1007/s12646-009-0014-5
17 Carmen M M, Pereira, Gomes J F S. The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: Impact on organisational performance[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2012, 23（20）: 4301–4318. DOI:10.1080/09585192.2012.667434
18 Chang Y Y. Strategic human resource management, transformational leadership organizational ambidexterity: Evidence from Taiwan[J]. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2015, 21（4）: 517–533. DOI:10.1080/13602381.2015.1029298
19 Chang Y Y. High-performance work systems, joint impact of transformational leadership, an empowerment climate and organizational ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2016, 29（3）: 424–444. DOI:10.1108/JOCM-09-2015-0150
20 Chuang P J, Chiu S F. When moral personality and moral ideology meet ethical leadership: A three-way interaction model[EB/OL]. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508422.2016.1229604, 2016-08-30.
21 Clugston M, Howell J P, Dorfman P W. Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment?[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26（1）: 5–30. DOI:10.1177/014920630002600106
22 Cole M S, Bruch H, Shamir B. Social distance as a moderator of the effects of transformational leadership: Both neutralizer and enhancer[J]. Human Relations, 2009, 62（11）: 1697–1733. DOI:10.1177/0018726709346377
23 Dionne S D, Yammarino F J, Atwater L E, et al. Neutralizing substitutes for leadership theory: Leadership effects and common-source bias[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, 87（3）: 454–464. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.454
24 Dionne S D, Yammarino F J, Howell J P, et al. Substitutes for leadership, or not[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2005, 16（1）: 169–193. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.012
25 Doucet O, Lapalme M, Simard G, et al. High involvement management practices as leadership enhancers[J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2015, 36（7）: 1058–1071. DOI:10.1108/IJM-10-2013-0243
26 Farh J L, Podsakoff P M, Cheng B S. Culture-free leadership effectiveness versus moderators of leadership behavior: An extension and test of Kerr and Jermier’s " substitutes for leadership” model in Taiwan[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1987, 18（3）: 43–60. DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490411
27 Farh J L, Hackett R D, Liang J. Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50（3）: 715–729. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.25530866
28 Grant A M, Gino F, Hofmann D A. Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: The role of employee proactivity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54（3）: 528–550. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61968043
29 Hartnell C A, Kinicki A J, Lambert L S, et al. Do similarities or differences between CEO leadership and organizational culture have a more positive effect on firm performance? A test of competing predictions[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101（6）: 846–861. DOI:10.1037/apl0000083
30 Hogg M A. A social identity theory of leadership[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2001, 5（3）: 184–200. DOI:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
31 Hong Y, Liao H, Raub S, et al. What it takes to get proactive: An integrative multilevel model of the antecedents of personal initiative[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101（5）: 687–701. DOI:10.1037/apl0000064
32 House R J, Mitchell T R. Path-goal theory of leadership[J]. Journal of Contemporary Business, 1974, 3（4）: 81–97.
33 Howard P W, Joyce W F. Substitutes for leadership: A statistical refinement[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1982, （1）: 165–169.
34 Howell J P, Bowen D E, Dorfman P W, et al. Substitutes for leadership: Effective alternatives to ineffective leadership[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1990, 19（1）: 21–38. DOI:10.1016/0090-2616(90)90046-R
35 Howell J P, Dorfman P W. Substitutes for leadership: Test of a construct[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1981, 24（4）: 714–728. DOI:10.2307/256171
36 Howell J P, Dorfman P W, Kerr S. Moderator variables in leadership research[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1986, 11（1）: 88–102.
37 Howell J M, Shamir B. The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30（1）: 96–112. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281435
38 Hussain G, Wan Ismail W K, Rashid M A, et al. Substitutes for leadership: Alternative perspectives[J]. Management Research Review, 2016, 39（5）: 546–568. DOI:10.1108/MRR-03-2015-0044
39 Jermier J M, Kerr S. " Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement”—Contextual recollections and current observations[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1997, 8（2）: 95–101. DOI:10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90008-4
40 Jernigan E, Beggs J. Substitutes for leadership and job satisfaction: Is there a relationship?[J]. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 2010, 14（2）: 97–106.
41 Jiang K F, Chuang C H, Chiao Y C. Developing collective customer knowledge and service climate: The interaction between service-oriented high-performance work systems and service leadership[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100（4）: 1089–1106. DOI:10.1037/apl0000005
42 Jiang W, Wang L L, Lin H. The role of cognitive processes and individual differences in the relationship between abusive supervision and employee career satisfaction[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016, 99: 155–160. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.088
43 Kerr S, Jermier J M. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1978, 22（3）: 375–403. DOI:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5
44 Künzle B, Zala-Mezö E, Kolbe M, et al. Substitutes for leadership in anaesthesia teams and their impact on leadership effectiveness[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2010, 19（5）: 505–531. DOI:10.1080/13594320902986170
45 Kwon B, Farndale E, Park J G. Employee voice and work engagement: Macro, meso, and micro-level drivers of convergence?[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2016, 26（4）: 327–337. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.04.005
46 Li N, Chiaburu D S, Kirkman B L, et al. Spotlight on the followers: An examination of moderators of relationships between transformational leadership and subordinates’ citizenship and taking charge[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2013, 66（1）: 225–260. DOI:10.1111/peps.2013.66.issue-1
47 Ling Q, Lin M Z, Wu X Y. The trickle-down effect of servant leadership on frontline employee service behaviors and performance: A multilevel study of Chinese hotels[J]. Tourism Management, 2016, 52: 341–368. DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.008
48 McClelland G H, Judd C M. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, 114（2）: 376–390. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
49 Mohammed S, Nadkarni S. Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54（3）: 489–508. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967991
50 Morrison E W. Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking[J]. Journal of Management, 2006, 32（1）: 5–28. DOI:10.1177/0149206305277790
51 Muchiri M K, Cooksey R W. Examining the effects of substitutes for leadership on performance outcomes[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2013, 32（8）: 817–836.
52 Neubert M J, Hunter E M, Tolentino R C. A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence?[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2016, 27（6）: 896–910. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005
53 Nübold A, Muck P M, Maier G W. A new substitute for leadership? Followers’ state core self-evaluations[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2013, 24（1）: 29–44. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.07.002
54 Özduran A, Tanova C. Coaching and employee organizational citizenship behaviours: The role of procedural justice climate[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2017, 60: 58–66.
55 Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Bommer W H. Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996, 81（4）: 380–399. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.380
56 Podsakoff P M, Mackenzie S B, Fetter R. Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1993, 4（1）: 1–44. DOI:10.1016/1048-9843(93)90002-B
57 Santos C M, Passos A M, Uitdewilligen S, et al. Shared temporal cognitions as substitute for temporal leadership: An analysis of their effects on temporal conflict and team performance[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2016, 27（4）: 574–587. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.002
58 Steg L, De Groot J. Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 49（4）: 725–743. DOI:10.1348/014466609X477745
59 Villa J R, Howell J P, Dorfman P W, et al. Problems with detecting moderators in leadership research using moderated multiple regression[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2003, 14（1）: 3–23. DOI:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00184-4
60 Wang P, Rode J C. Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate[J]. Human Relations, 2010, 63（8）: 1105–1128. DOI:10.1177/0018726709354132
61 Whittington J L, Bell R G. Leader-member exchange, enriched jobs, and goal-setting: Applying fuzzy set methodology[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69（4）: 1401–1406. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.115
62 Xu X D, Zhong J A, Wang X Y. The impact of substitutes for leadership on job satisfaction and performance[J]. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2013, 41（4）: 675–685. DOI:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.675
63 Zhao H H, Seibert S E, Taylor M S, et al. Not even the past: The joint influence of former leader and new leader during leader succession in the midst of organizational change[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101（12）: 1730–1738. DOI:10.1037/apl0000149
引用本文
尹奎, 王崇锋, 张凯丽. 领导替代理论前沿述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(11): 61–76.
导出参考文献，格式为：
