人工智能、任务重构与技术红利的分配

Artificial Intelligence, Task Restructuring, and the Distribution of Productivity Gains

刘东升,王永中

2026 第 52 卷 第 08 期 页码 49-63

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20260720.401

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

人工智能(AI)是推动全要素生产率增长的重要力量,但其创造的技术红利如何分配还不清晰。文章利用中国A股上市公司年报文本与网络招聘平台数据,从任务重构视角考察AI影响企业全要素生产率的微观机制及其分配后果。研究发现,AI通过任务替代与任务拓展双重路径显著提高企业全要素生产率。尽管这两条路径均能促进全要素生产率增长,但其收入分配效应呈现显著差异:任务拓展提高工资水平与劳动收入份额,任务替代则显著降低工资水平与劳动收入份额。从整体上看,任务替代对劳动收入的负向影响大于任务拓展的正向影响,这导致AI技术红利对资本影响更大,并带来潜在的分配失衡风险。异质性分析显示,在服务业企业以及位于就业政策导向相对较弱城市的企业中,AI的生产率提升效应更强,对劳动收入份额的抑制作用也更明显。文章从任务重构视角深化了对AI生产率效应及其分配后果的认识,为兼顾技术创新与收入分配公平提供了经验证据。

Artificial intelligence (AI) not only improves production efficiency but also reshapes the structure of job tasks and the distribution of income between labor and capital. AI can both substitute for existing tasks and create new ones, so different forms of task restructuring may have divergent effects on productivity and income distribution. Identifying the channels through which AI generates productivity gains and affects their distribution is therefore essential for reconciling technological progress with employment stability and income equality.

Drawing on the annual reports of China’s A-share listed companies and data from online recruitment platforms, this paper uses text analysis and task matching to measure firm-level AI adoption and job-level task substitution, task expansion, and posted wages. Using an instrumental-variable approach, it examines AI’s productivity effects, task-restructuring mechanisms, and distributional consequences. The results show that AI increases firm TFP through both task substitution and task expansion, although the two channels have opposing distributional effects. Task expansion increases posted wages and the labor income share of non-executive employees, whereas task substitution significantly reduces both. Because the negative effect of task substitution on labor income outweighs the positive effect of task expansion, AI-generated productivity gains disproportionately accrue to capital. These effects are more pronounced in service-sector firms, which experience both larger productivity gains and a greater decline in the labor income share of non-executive employees.

This paper develops measures that link firm-level AI adoption to job-level task restructuring. It explains both the generation and distribution of AI-generated productivity gains by distinguishing between the channels of task substitution and task expansion, thereby providing new micro-level empirical evidence on the economic effects of AI. The findings suggest that policymakers should improve education and vocational training systems, encourage firms to adopt human–AI collaboration and task-expanding applications, and strengthen labor protection and benefit-sharing mechanisms to enable workers to share more fully in the productivity gains generated by AI.

参考文献

1 安同良, 吴致冶. 企业人工智能技术水平的分层测度及其创新效应——基于全球知识网络视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025, (6): 81−100. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2025.06.005
2 陈东, 秦子洋. 人工智能与包容性增长——来自全球工业机器人使用的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2022, (4): 85−102.
3 陈琳, 高悦蓬, 余林徽. 人工智能如何改变企业对劳动力的需求?——来自招聘平台大数据的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2024, (6): 74−91. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.06.005
4 何小钢, 毛莘娅, 郭晓斌. 人工智能技术、职业技能重塑与工资效应[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2026, (5): 54−78.
5 黄浩权, 戴天仕, 沈军. 人工智能发展、干中学效应与技能溢价——基于内生技术进步模型的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (2): 99−117. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2024.02.007
6 黄卓, 陶云清, 刘兆达, 等. 智能制造、人力资本升级与企业劳动收入份额[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2024, (5): 1412−1427. DOI:10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2024.05.03
7 刘东升, 袁媛. 人工智能、技能剥离与企业收入差距[J]. 财经研究, 2026, (1): 123−137. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20251117.401
8 卢国军, 崔小勇, 王弟海. 自动化技术、结构转型与中国收入分配格局的演化[J]. 金融研究, 2023, (4): 19−35.
9 吕瑛, 乔歆然, 孔晓. 人工智能对就业格局演变影响研究进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2026, (5): 203−224.
10 孟庆斌, 杨俊华, 鲁冰. 管理层讨论与分析披露的信息含量与股价崩盘风险——基于文本向量化方法的研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017, (12): 132−150.
11 苏治, 李颖, 程稚渊. 人工智能如何重塑要素收入分配格局?——基于企业劳动力市场垄断势力的微观证据[J]. 经济研究, 2025, (9): 218−238. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0577-9154.2025.09.012
12 孙早, 侯玉琳. 工业智能化如何重塑劳动力就业结构[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, (5): 61−79.
13 王林辉, 钱圆圆, 周慧琳, 等. 人工智能技术冲击和中国职业变迁方向[J]. 管理世界, 2023, (11): 74−93. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2023.0131
14 王林辉, 周慧琳, 钱圆圆, 等. 机器人应用冲击、职业可迁移技能和职业—技能合意性[J]. 管理世界, 2024, (11): 85−103. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.11.006
15 汪佩洁, 蒙克, 黄海, 等. 社会保险缴费率与企业全要素生产率和创新[J]. 经济研究, 2022, (10): 69−85.
16 汪前元, 魏守道, 金山, 等. 工业智能化的就业效应研究——基于劳动者技能和性别的空间计量分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, (10): 110−125. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.10.018
17 肖土盛, 董启琛, 张明昂, 等. 竞争政策与企业劳动收入份额——基于《反垄断法》实施的准自然实验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (4): 117−135. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2023.04.007
18 谢宇, 索菲娅•阿维拉. 基于大语言模型的生成式人工智能的社会影响[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2025, (2): 273−292. DOI:10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2025.02.01
19 姚加权, 张锟澎, 郭李鹏, 等. 人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?——基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, (2): 101−116. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.02.006
20 曾帅, 罗长远, 李铮. 外部需求、企业劳动力市场势力与劳动收入份额——来自中国上市企业的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2026, (1): 114−131.
21 赵璨, 陈仕华, 曹伟. “互联网+”信息披露: 实质性陈述还是策略性炒作——基于股价崩盘风险的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020, (3): 174−192.
22 Acemoglu D. The simple macroeconomics of AI[J]. Economic Policy, 2025, 40(121): 13−58. DOI:10.1093/epolic/eiae042
23 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment[J]. American Economic Review, 2018, 108(6): 1488−1542. DOI:10.1257/aer.20160696
24 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Tasks, automation, and the rise in U. S. wage inequality[J]. Econometrica, 2022, 90(5): 1973−2016. DOI:10.3982/ECTA19815
25 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Automation and rent dissipation: Implications for wages, inequality, and productivity[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 32536, 2024.
26 Agrawal A, McHale J, Oettl A. Finding needles in haystacks: Artificial intelligence and recombinant growth[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 24541, 2018.
27 Agarwal R, Dugas M, Gao G D. Augmenting physicians with artificial intelligence to transform healthcare: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2024, 33(2): 360−374. DOI:10.1111/jems.12555
28 Autor D, Salomons A. Is automation labor-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 24871, 2018.
29 Autor D H. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2015, 29(3): 3−30. DOI:10.1257/jep.29.3.3
30 Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies[M]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014.
31 Choudhary V, Marchetti A, Shrestha Y R, et al. Human-AI ensembles: When can they work?[J]. Journal of Management, 2025, 51(2): 536−569. DOI:10.1177/01492063231194968
32 Felten E, Raj M, Seamans R. Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2021, 42(12): 2195−2217. DOI:10.1002/smj.3286
33 Humlum A. Robot adoption and labor market dynamics[R]. Study Paper No. 175, 2021.
34 Korinek A, Stiglitz J E. Artificial intelligence, globalization, and strategies for economic development[R]. NBER Working Paper No. 28453, 2021.
35 Lei Y W, Kim R. Automation and augmentation: Artificial intelligence, robots, and work[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2024, 50: 251−272. DOI:10.1146/annurev-soc-090523-050708
36 Pieper M, Gleasure R. How AI helps to compile human intelligence: An empirical study of emerging augmented intelligence for medical image scanning[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2025, 35(5): 1399−1421. DOI:10.1111/isj.12585
37 Riemer K, Peter S. Conceptualizing generative AI as style engines: Application archetypes and implications[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2024, 79: 102824. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102824

数据公开

标题文件大小下载
附件 24.3 KB
企业数据拆解 4.2 MB
数据及程序代码 5.6 MB
招聘数据拆解 23.6 MB