56 
46关系能量对个体与团队绩效具有重要促进作用，但现有研究仍存在两方面不足：其一，缺乏从社会网络视角探讨关系能量的结构前因；其二，较少在团队层面检验关系能量的形成与演化机制。基于互动仪式链理论与资源保存理论，本文构建团队层次“多重网络→关系能量→工作绩效”的结构—资源动态模型，揭示团队层面关系能量在生成与维系过程中的异质性，并检验团队任务互依性的调节作用。对7家公司的137个团队进行的三轮纵向数据分析发现：团队多重网络密度能够提升团队关系能量的存量，并进一步提升团队绩效；然而，多重网络密度会降低团队关系能量的增量，进而减缓团队绩效增长；团队任务互依性能够缓解上述负向动态效应。整合静态与动态路径，研究揭示了多重网络对团队关系能量的“双刃剑”效应。本文从结构视角拓展了关系能量理论，丰富了团队层面该理论的动态解释框架。
多重网络、关系能量与绩效：团队层次的静动态整合模型
摘要
参考文献
5 徐伟青, 檀小兵, 奉小斌, 等. 国外团队社会网络研究回顾与展望: 基于知识转移视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2011, 33(11): 29-38.
6 张静, 陈汇涓, 倪丹. 基于领导正念赋能视角的员工工作繁荣形成机制研究[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2024, 41(3): 6-20.
7 Ackerman P L. Cognitive fatigue: Multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications[M]. Washington: American Psychological Association, 2011.
8 Ali S A, Mujahid K, Umar M. Feel like quitting the job? A causal attribution approach to social and work overload consequences[J]. Management Research Review, 2022, 45(11): 1431-1449. DOI:10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0180
9 Baker W, Cross R, Wooten M. Positive organizational network analysis and energizing relationships[A]. Cameron K S, Dutton J E, Quinn R E. Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline[M]. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, 2003.
10 Baker W E. Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: Toward a multilevel model[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2019, 6: 373-395. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015047
11 Borgatti S P, Everett M G, Freeman L C. Ucinet 6 for windows: Software for social network analysis[M]. Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
12 Brass D J. New developments in social network analysis[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2022, 9: 225-246. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090628
13 Cameron L D, Overall N C. Suppression and expression as distinct emotion-regulation processes in daily interactions: Longitudinal and meta-analyses[J]. Emotion, 2018, 18(4): 465-480. DOI:10.1037/emo0000334
14 Carson J B, Tesluk P E, Marrone J A. Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(5): 1217-1234.
15 Chiu C Y, Balkundi P, Owens B P, et al. Shaping positive and negative ties to improve team effectiveness: The roles of leader humility and team helping norms[J]. Human Relations, 2022, 75(3): 502-531. DOI:10.1177/0018726720968135
16 Clarke R, Richter A W, Kilduff M. One tie to capture advice and friendship: Leader multiplex centrality effects on team performance change[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2022, 107(6): 968-986. DOI:10.1037/apl0000979
17 Coleman J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94(1): S95-S120.
18 Collins R. Interaction ritual chains[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
19 De Clercq D. Getting creative with resources: How resilience, task interdependence, and emotion sharing mitigate the damage of employee role ambiguity[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2019, 55(3): 369-391. DOI:10.1177/0021886319853803
20 Dean J W, Snell S A. Integrated manufacturing and job design: Moderating effects of organizational inertia[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(4): 776-804. DOI:10.2307/256389
21 Dutton J E. Energize your workplace: How to create and sustain high-quality connections at work[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
22 Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1): 1-22. DOI:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
23 Ertug G, Brennecke J, Tasselli S. Theorizing about the implications of multiplexity: An integrative typology[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2023, 17(2): 626-654. DOI:10.5465/annals.2021.0193
24 Faraj S, Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(12): 1554-1568. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
25 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses[J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41(4): 1149-1160. DOI:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
26 Gerbasi A, Porath C L, Parker A, et al. Destructive de-energizing relationships: How thriving buffers their effect on performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2015, 100(5): 1423-1433. DOI:10.1037/apl0000015
27 Grosser T J, Sterling C M, Piplani R S. Energized people in prominent places: Political support networks, relational energy, and employee innovation implementation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2023, 44(8): 1145-1163. DOI:10.1002/job.2734
28 Grynberg D, Konrath S. The closer you feel, the more you care: Positive associations between closeness, pain intensity rating, empathic concern and personal distress to someone in pain[J]. Acta Psychologica, 2020, 210: 103175. DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103175
29 Hobfoll S E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress[J]. American Psychologist, 1989, 44(3): 513-524. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
30 Iqbal Q, Volpone S D, Piwowar-Sulej K. Workforce neurodiversity and workplace avoidance behavior: The role of inclusive leadership, relational energy, and self-control demands[J]. Human Resource Management, 2025, 64(1): 37-57. DOI:10.1002/hrm.22249
31 Janardhanan N S, Lewis k, Reger R K, et al. Getting to know you: Motivating cross-understanding for improved team and individual performance[J]. Organization Science, 2020, 31(1): 103-118. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2019.1324
32 Jia L D, Shaw J D, Tsui A S, et al. A social–structural perspective on employee–organization relationships and team creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(3): 869-891. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.0147
33 Kirkman B L, Rosen B. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999, 42(1): 58-74. DOI:10.2307/256874
34 Koopman J, Lanaj K, Scott B A. Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(2): 414-435. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0262
35 Li Y, Li N, Guo J Z, et al. A network view of advice-giving and individual creativity in teams: A brokerage-driven, socially perpetuated phenomenon[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2018, 61(6): 2210-2229. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0212
36 Lin S H, Poulton E C, Tu M H, et al. The consequences of empathic concern for the actors themselves: Understanding empathic concern through conservation of resources and work-home resources perspectives[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2022, 107(10): 1843-1863. DOI:10.1037/apl0000984
37 Ma W J, Perlow L A, Eun E. Backstage matters: Collective energy and information-sharing on global teams[J]. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2024, 10(3): 463-487. DOI:10.5465/amd.2022.0131
38 Maier C, Laumer S, Eckhardt A, et al. Giving too much social support: Social overload on social networking sites[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2015, 24(5): 447-464. DOI:10.1057/ejis.2014.3
39 Mao J Y, Li Y, Guo L, et al. Diminished relational energy: How and when co-worker incompetence accusations hinder employee creativity[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2022, 31(3): 383-394. DOI:10.1080/1359432X.2021.1979963
40 Matusik J G, Hollenbeck J R, Mitchell R L. Latent change score models for the study of development and dynamics in organizational research[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2021, 24(4): 772-801. DOI:10.1177/1094428120963788
41 McArdle J J. Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2009, 60: 577-605. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
42 Methot J R, Lepine J A, Podsakoff N P, et al. Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69(2): 311-355. DOI:10.1111/peps.12109
43 Muthén L K, Muthén B O. Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables, user’s guide[M]. 8th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén, 2017.
44 Oh H, Chung M H, Labianca G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(6): 860-875. DOI:10.2307/20159627
45 Owens B P, Baker W E, Sumpter D M, et al. Relational energy at work: Implications for job engagement and job performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2016, 101(1): 35-49. DOI:10.1037/apl0000032
46 Ozcelik H. An empirical analysis of surface acting in intra-organizational relationships[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2013, 34(3): 291-309. DOI:10.1002/job.1798
47 Park S, Grosser T J, Roebuck A A, et al. Understanding work teams from a network perspective: A review and future research directions[J]. Journal of Management, 2020, 46(6): 1002-1028. DOI:10.1177/0149206320901573
48 Preacher K J, Zyphur M J, Zhang Z. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation[J]. Psychological Methods, 2010, 15(3): 209-233. DOI:10.1037/a0020141
49 Quinn R W, Spreitzer G M, Lam C F. Building a sustainable model of human energy in organizations: Exploring the critical role of resources[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2012, 6(1): 337-396. DOI:10.5465/19416520.2012.676762
50 Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R. The role of interdependence in the micro-foundations of organization design: Task, goal, and knowledge interdependence[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(2): 828-868. DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0015
51 Reichl C, Leiter M P, Spinath F M. Work–nonwork conflict and burnout: A meta-analysis[J]. Human Relations, 2014, 67(8): 979-1005. DOI:10.1177/0018726713509857
52 Rico R, Alcover C M, Sánchez-Manzanares M, et al. The joint relationships of communication behaviors and task interdependence on trust building and change in virtual project teams[J]. Social Science Information, 2009, 48(2): 229-255. DOI:10.1177/0539018409102410
53 Shah P P, Dirks K T, Chervany N. The multiple pathways of high performing groups: The interaction of social networks and group processes[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(3): 299-317. DOI:10.1002/job.368
54 Sias P M, Tsetsi E, Woo N, et al. With a little help from my friends: Perceived task interdependence, coworker communication, and workplace friendship[J]. Communication Studies, 2020, 71(4): 528-549. DOI:10.1080/10510974.2020.1749863
55 Stoverink A C, Kirkman B L, Mistry S, et al. Bouncing back together: Toward a theoretical model of work team resilience[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2020, 45(2): 395-422. DOI:10.5465/amr.2017.0005
56 Tang P M, Ilies R, Aw S S Y, et al. How and when service beneficiaries’ gratitude enriches employees’ daily lives[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2022, 107(6): 987-1008. DOI:10.1037/apl0000975
57 Tran A, Greenaway K H, Kostopoulos J, et al. Does interpersonal emotion regulation effort pay off[J]. Emotion, 2024, 24(2): 345-356. DOI:10.1037/emo0001289
58 Van Der Vegt G S, Bunderson J S, Oosterhof A. Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(5): 877-893. DOI:10.5465/amj.2006.22798169
59 Wang L, Owens B P, Li J, et al. Exploring the affective impact, boundary conditions, and antecedents of leader humility[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2018, 103(9): 1019-1038. DOI:10.1037/apl0000314
60 Widianto S, Abdul Sahib H M, Rahman M F W. Task interdependence, team identity and team performance: A bottom-up multilevel model[J]. Sage Open, 2024, 14(1): 21582440241237874.
61 Woehr D J, Loignon A C, Schmidt P B, et al. Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs: A review and examination of cutoff values for common aggregation indices[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2015, 18(4): 704-737. DOI:10.1177/1094428115582090
62 Wong S S, DeSanctis G, Staudenmayer N. The relationship between task interdependency and role stress: A revisit of the job demands–control model[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2007, 44(2): 284-303. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00689.x
引用本文
汪洋, 何刚, 张生军, 等. 多重网络、关系能量与绩效：团队层次的静动态整合模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(6): 135-152.
导出参考文献，格式为：
