4464 
5777近年来，越来越多的管理学者呼吁“研究中国问题、讲好中国故事”。尽管一批学者对“本土管理研究”的基本问题（如对象、原则和方法论等）进行了探讨和澄清，但从研究实践的角度来看，我们仍不十分清楚中国管理好故事是什么，以及如何发现和讲述中国管理好故事。本文通过整理、归纳和剖析国内外期刊上呈现的优秀中国管理故事，针对以下三方面内容进行深入探讨：究竟什么样的故事是好的中国管理故事？在研究想法产生阶段，我们应该如何提出重要的、有价值的研究问题？在研究设计和执行阶段，我们应该如何选择合适的方法、规范的操作来提升研究的严谨性和可靠性？希望通过对管理研究案例的梳理和分析，激发研究者对本土现象的关注和兴趣，从研究实践的角度为国内管理学研究者讲好中国管理故事指明方向。
讲好“中国故事”——管理学者的责任与行动方向
摘要
参考文献
1 艾尔•巴比著, 邱泽奇译. 社会研究方法[M]. 2版. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2018.
2 陈春花. 管理研究与管理实践之弥合[J]. 管理学报,2017, (10): 1421-1425. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2017.10.001
3 陈维政, 任晗. 人情关系和社会交换关系的比较分析与管理策略研究[J]. 管理学报,2015, (6): 789-798. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.06.002
4 陈晔, 白长虹, 吴小灵. 服务品牌内化的概念及概念模型: 基于跨案例研究的结论[J]. 南开管理评论,2011, (2): 44-51, 60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.02.006
5 高子茵, 宋继文, 欧阳林依, 等. 因时乘势, 与时偕行——小米模式背后的时间领导力[J]. 管理学报,2019, (11): 1581-1592, 1600. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.11.001
6 李海舰, 李文杰, 李然. 中国未来养老模式研究——基于时间银行的拓展路径[J]. 管理世界,2020, (3): 76-90. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.03.006
7 李平. 中国本土管理研究与中国传统哲学[J]. 管理学报,2013, (9): 1249-1261. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2013.09.001
9 李志刚, 许晨鹤, 乐国林. 基于扎根理论方法的孵化型裂变创业探索性研究——以海尔集团孵化雷神公司为例[J]. 管理学报,2016, (7): 972-979. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2016.07.003
11 刘军, 吴隆增, 林雨. 应对辱虐管理: 下属逢迎与政治技能的作用机制研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2009, (2): 52-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2009.02.007
13 刘意, 谢康, 邓弘林. 数据驱动的产品研发转型: 组织惯例适应性变革视角的案例研究[J]. 管理世界,2020, (3): 164-183. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.03.011
18 施卓敏, 郑婉怡. 面子文化中消费者生态产品偏好的眼动研究[J]. 管理世界,2017, (9): 129-140, 169. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2017.09.011
19 斯蒂芬•P. 罗宾斯, 蒂莫西•A. 贾奇著, 孙健敏, 李原, 黄小勇译. 组织行为学[M]. 14版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012.
20 王建明, 贺爱忠. 消费者低碳消费行为的心理归因和政策干预路径: 一个基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2011, (4): 80-89, 99. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2011.04.010
22 王庆娟, 张金成. 工作场所的儒家传统价值观: 理论、测量与效度检验[J]. 南开管理评论,2012, (4): 66-79, 110. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.04.008
25 张晓洁, 王海珍. 中国文化背景下管理中的“关系”研究综述[J]. 管理学报,2014, (7): 1087-1094. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2014.07.019
27 周文辉, 邓伟, 陈凌子. 基于滴滴出行的平台企业数据赋能促进价值共创过程研究[J]. 管理学报,2018, (8): 1110-1119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2018.08.002
28 周禹, 刘光建, 唱小溪. 管理学“矛盾视角”的概念内涵与主要范式[J]. 管理学报,2019, (9): 1280-1289. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.09.002
29 朱秀梅, 林晓玥, 王天东. 数字创业生态系统动态演进机理——基于杭州云栖小镇的案例研究[J]. 管理学报,2020, (4): 487-497. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2020.04.002
30 Baer M, Dhensa-Kahlon R K, Colquitt J A, et al. Uneasy lies the head that bears the trust: The effects of feeling trusted on emotional exhaustion[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(6): 1637-1657. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0246
31 Becker T E. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations[J]. Organizational Research Methods,2005, 8(3): 274-289. DOI:10.1177/1094428105278021
32 Bono J E, McNamara G. Publishing in AMJ-Part 2: Research design[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011, 54(4): 657-660. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.64869103
33 Cao J, Hamori M. How can employers benefit most from developmental job experiences? The needs-supplies fit perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2020, 105(4): 422-432. DOI:10.1037/apl0000449
34 Chen M J. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration[J]. Academy of Management Review,1996, 21(1): 100-134. DOI:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161567
35 Chen X W, Zhu Z, Liu J. Does a trusted leader always behave better? The relationship between leader feeling trusted by employees and benevolent and laissez-faire leadership behaviors[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2019. DOI:10.1007/s10551-019-04390-7
36 Colquitt J A, Conlon D E, Wesson M J, et al. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2001, 86(3): 425-445. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
37 Colquitt J A, George G. Publishing in AMJ-Part 1: Topic choice[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011, 54(3): 432-435. DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.61965960
38 Colquitt J A, Scott B A, Rodell J B, et al. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2013, 98(2): 199-236. DOI:10.1037/a0031757
39 Creswell J W, Clark V L P. Designing and conducting mixed methods research[M]. 2nd ed. Thousand: SAGE Publications Inc., 2010.
40 Fan X L, Wang Q Q, Liu J, et al. Why do supervisors abuse subordinates? Effects of team performance, regulatory focus, and emotional exhaustion[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2020. DOI:10.1111/joop.12307
41 Hofmann D A, Morgeson F P, Gerras S J. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003, 88(1): 170-178. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170
42 Hu J, Erdogan B, Jiang K, et al. Leader humility and team creativity: The role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2018, 103(3): 313-323. DOI:10.1037/apl0000277
43 Huang X, Chen X P, Hitt M, et al. Management and OrganizationReview special issue on ‘Responsible leadership in China and beyond: A responsible research approach’[J]. Management and Organization Review,2020, 16(1): 215-220. DOI:10.1017/mor.2020.8
44 James L R. The unmeasured variables problem in path analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1980, 65(4): 415-421. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.415
45 Lin K J, Savani K, Ilies R. Doing good, feeling good? The roles of helping motivation and citizenship pressure[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2019, 104(8): 1020-1035. DOI:10.1037/apl0000392
46 Matta F K, Scott B A, Colquitt J A, et al. Is consistently unfair better than sporadically fair? An investigation of justice variability and stress[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017, 60(2): 743-770. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0455
47 Qin X, Ren R, Zhang Z X, et al. Fairness heuristics and substitutability effects: Inferring the fairness of outcomes, procedures, and interpersonal treatment when employees lack clear information[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2015, 100(3): 749-766. DOI:10.1037/a0038084
48 Qin X, Huang M P, Johnson R E, et al. The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory behavior for actors: An investigation of recovery and work engagement[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2018, 61(5): 1951-1975. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.1325
50 Tsui A S. GUIDEPOST: Responsible research and responsible leadership studies[J]. Academy of Management Discoveries,2019. DOI:10.5465/amd.2019.0244
51 Wee E X M, Liao H, Liu D, et al. Moving from abuse to reconciliation: A power-dependence perspective on when and how a follower can break the spiral of abuse[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017, 60(6): 2352-2380. DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.0866
52 Yao J J, Zhang Z X, Brett J, et al. Understanding the trust deficit in China: Mapping positive experience and trust in strangers[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2017, 143: 85-97. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.12.003
53 Zhang X N, Liao H Y, Li N, et al. Playing it safe for my family: Exploring the dual effects of family motivation on employee productivity and creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2019. DOI:10.5465/amj.2018.0680
54 Zhang Y, Waldman D A, Han Y L, et al. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(2): 538-566. DOI:10.5465/amj.2012.0995
引用本文
刘军, 朱征, 李增鑫. 讲好“中国故事”——管理学者的责任与行动方向[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(8): 36-49.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：使命效价：文献述评与研究展望
