508 
387结合创业学习理论与技能—组织—环境框架，本文对“创业学习如何赋能海归人员归国创业”这一问题开展探索式案例研究。以四位海归人员归国创业实践为对象，从海外技术迁移、技商市场融合以及本土商业发展三个阶段，识别出“技术迁移困境”“技术转化困境”“组织适应困境”三类困境，归纳出海归人员“技术解构能力”“环境应对能力”“组织外联能力”三种能力，提炼出“构建技术生态”“助推融合实践”“缔结跨域差异”三项策略，进而构建出“创业学习赋能海归人员归国创业路径”模型，阐释了创业学习如何赋能海归人员突破本土创业困境进而推动创业发展的内在逻辑。研究不仅拓展了对海归创业研究的理解，同时为促进海归人员在本土成功创业提供理论支持和实践指导，亦为创业学习理论引入了跨文化视角的新维度。
创业学习如何赋能海归人员归国创业？
摘要
参考文献
1 陈寒松, 牟筱笛, 贾竣云. 创业企业何以提高创新绩效——基于创业学习与商业模式创新协同联动视角的QCA方法[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(6): 19-26. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2019090847
2 杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9): 127-145. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.09.010
5 贾卫峰, 吴格倩, 肖成英. 互联网嵌入方式对新创企业绩效的影响机制——创业学习的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(6): 91-100. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2021110584
7 李志刚, 杜鑫, 杨德林, 等. 新创企业与在位企业视角下裂变创业研究评述与展望[J]. 管理学报, 2023a, 20(3): 461-472. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2023.03.015
8 李志刚, 杨琛, 刘金, 等. 海归人员“先抑后扬式”裂变创业路径研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023b, 20(10): 1486-1497. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2023.10.008
10 吕芬, 朱煜明, 凯瑟琳·罗伯特, 等. 外部环境对中小型企业采用数字技术影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(12): 2232-2240. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2021.12.013
13 习近平. 深入实施新时代人才强国战略加快建设世界重要人才中心和创新高地[J]. 求是, 2021, (24): 4-15.
14 徐占东, 刘鹏佩, 杨学磊. 知识获取视阈下创业学习对新创企业创新绩效的影响机制——环境动态性的调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(6): 118-128. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2023080264
15 周冬梅, 陈雪琳, 杨俊, 等. 创业研究回顾与展望[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(1): 206-225. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.01.017
17 Bağış M, Kryeziu L, Kurutkan M N, et al. Youth entrepreneurial intentions: A cross-cultural comparison[J]. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 2023, 17(4): 769-792. DOI:10.1108/JEC-01-2022-0005
18 Das S, Kundu A, Bhattacharya A. Technology adaptation and survival of SMEs: A longitudinal study of developing countries[J]. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2020, 10(6): 64-72. DOI:10.22215/timreview/1369
19 Filatotchev I, Liu X H, Buck T, et al. The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2009, 40(6): 1005-1021. DOI:10.1057/jibs.2008.105
20 Gallego-Álvarez I, Pucheta-Martínez M C. Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and R&D intensity as an innovation strategy: A view from different institutional contexts[J]. Eurasian Business Review, 2021, 11(2): 191-220. DOI:10.1007/s40821-020-00168-4
21 Gruenhagen J H, Davidsson P, Sawang S. Returnee entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review, thematic analysis, and research agenda[J]. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 2020, 16(4): 310-392.
22 Lin C H, Chen W H. A technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework based on scientometry for understanding the risk factors in sustainable water resources management[J]. Water Resources Management, 2023, 37(15): 5849-5869. DOI:10.1007/s11269-023-03634-6
23 Morris T H, König P D. Self-directed experiential learning to meet ever-changing entrepreneurship demands[J]. Education + Training, 2020, 63(1): 23-49. DOI:10.1108/ET-09-2019-0209
24 Nguyen T H, Le X C, Vu T H L. An extended technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework for online retailing utilization in digital transformation: Empirical evidence from Vietnam[J]. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2022, 8(4): 200. DOI:10.3390/joitmc8040200
25 Nogueira T F. Entrepreneurial learning: What do we mean by it ?[J]. The Learning Organization, 2019, 26(6): 560-573. DOI:10.1108/TLO-04-2018-0067
26 Sarta A, Durand R, Vergne J P. Organizational adaptation[J]. Journal of management, 2021, 47(1): 43-75.
27 Shen Y, Wang Q, Hua D N, et al. Entrepreneurial learning, self-efficacy, and firm performance: Exploring moderating effect of entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 731628. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731628
28 Song Q, Chen X H, Gu H. How technological, organizational, and environmental factors drive enterprise digital innovation: Analysis based on the dynamic FsQCA approach[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(16): 12248. DOI:10.3390/su151612248
29 Wei X J, Liu X L, Sha J. How does the entrepreneurship education influence the students’ innovation? Testing on the multiple mediation model[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10: 1557. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01557
30 Xiao C, Wang X Y. Overseas Chinese returnees’ swindler syndrome and their entrepreneurial education under psychological resilience[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 12: 747687. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747687
引用本文
李志刚, 杨琛, 刘振, 等. 创业学习如何赋能海归人员归国创业？[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(5): 82-99.
导出参考文献，格式为：
本期封面
相关论文
