严密性和实用性:管理学研究双重目标的争论与统一
5803 
605
外国经济与管理 2009 年 第 31 卷第 01 期, 页码：9 - 15
摘要
参考文献
摘要
针对管理学研究与管理实践的相关性越来越弱的态势,越来越多的研究者对管理学研究与管理学院的研究取向和教育模式提出了质疑,这使得严密性与实用性的争论变得空前激烈。本文对这一争论的由来、造成管理理论与实践脱节的原因和解决对策进行了全面的论述,目的在于提醒我国的管理学研究者在加强研究规范化的同时,应警惕有可能导致的实用性弱化问题。
[1]Bennis,W G,and O’Toole,J.How business schools lost their way[J.]Harvard Business Review,2005,83(5):96-104.
[2]Hinings,C R,and Greenwood,R.Disconnects and consequences in organization theory[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2002,47(3):411-421.
[3]Van de Ven,A H,and Johnson,P E.Knowledge for theory and practice[J.]Academy of Management Review,2006,31(4):802-821.
[4]Tushman,M L,and O’Reilly III,C.Research and relevance:Implications of pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty de-velopment[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(4):769-774.
[5]Rynes,S L,Giluk,T L,and Brown,K G.The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource man-agement:Implications for evidence-based management[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):987-1 008.
[6]Gelade,G A.But what does it mean in practice?The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology from a practitioner per-spective[J].Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2006,79:153-160.
[7]Bartunek,J M.Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research:Toward a relational scholarship of inte-gration[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(6):1 323-1 333.
[8]Raelin,J A.Toward an epistemology of practice[J].Academy of Management Learning&Education,2007,6(4):495-519.
[9]Anderson,N.The practitioner-researcher divide revisited:Strategic-level bridges and the roles of IWO psychologists[J.]Journal of Oc-cupational and Organizational Psychology,2007,80:175-183.
[10]Hitt,M A,Beamish,P W,Jackson,S E,and Mathieu,J E.Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels:Multilevel researchin management[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(6):1 385-1 399.
[11]Tsui,A S.From homogenization to pluralism:International management research in the academy and beyond[J].Academy of Man-agement Journal,2007,50(6):1 353-1 364.
[12]Gulati,R.Tent poles,tribalism,and boundary spanning:The rigor-relevance debate in management research[J.]Academy of Manage-ment Journal,2007,50(4):775-782.
[13]McGrath,R G.No longer a stepchild:How the management field can come into its own[J.]Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(6):1 365-1 378.
[14]Lawler III,E E.Why HR practices are not evidence-based[J.]Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 033-1 036.
[15]Latham,G P.A speculative perspective on the transfer of behavioral science findings to the workplace:“The Times They are A-chan-gin’”[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 027-1 032.
[16]Saari,L.Commentary on the very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 043-1 045.
[17]Cohen,D.JThe very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management:Reasons for the divideand concrete solutions for bridging the gap[J.]Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 013-1 019.
[18]Shapiro,D L,Kirkman,B L,and Courtney,H G.Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(2):249-266.
[19]Rynes,S L.Let’s create a tipping point:What academics and practitioners can do,alone and together[J].Academy of ManagementJournal,2007b,50(5):1 046-1 054.
[20]Pfeffer,J.A modest proposal:How we might change the process and product of managerial research[J].Academy of ManagementJournal,2007,50(6):1 334-1 345.
[2]Hinings,C R,and Greenwood,R.Disconnects and consequences in organization theory[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2002,47(3):411-421.
[3]Van de Ven,A H,and Johnson,P E.Knowledge for theory and practice[J.]Academy of Management Review,2006,31(4):802-821.
[4]Tushman,M L,and O’Reilly III,C.Research and relevance:Implications of pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty de-velopment[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(4):769-774.
[5]Rynes,S L,Giluk,T L,and Brown,K G.The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource man-agement:Implications for evidence-based management[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):987-1 008.
[6]Gelade,G A.But what does it mean in practice?The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology from a practitioner per-spective[J].Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,2006,79:153-160.
[7]Bartunek,J M.Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research:Toward a relational scholarship of inte-gration[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(6):1 323-1 333.
[8]Raelin,J A.Toward an epistemology of practice[J].Academy of Management Learning&Education,2007,6(4):495-519.
[9]Anderson,N.The practitioner-researcher divide revisited:Strategic-level bridges and the roles of IWO psychologists[J.]Journal of Oc-cupational and Organizational Psychology,2007,80:175-183.
[10]Hitt,M A,Beamish,P W,Jackson,S E,and Mathieu,J E.Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels:Multilevel researchin management[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(6):1 385-1 399.
[11]Tsui,A S.From homogenization to pluralism:International management research in the academy and beyond[J].Academy of Man-agement Journal,2007,50(6):1 353-1 364.
[12]Gulati,R.Tent poles,tribalism,and boundary spanning:The rigor-relevance debate in management research[J.]Academy of Manage-ment Journal,2007,50(4):775-782.
[13]McGrath,R G.No longer a stepchild:How the management field can come into its own[J.]Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(6):1 365-1 378.
[14]Lawler III,E E.Why HR practices are not evidence-based[J.]Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 033-1 036.
[15]Latham,G P.A speculative perspective on the transfer of behavioral science findings to the workplace:“The Times They are A-chan-gin’”[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 027-1 032.
[16]Saari,L.Commentary on the very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 043-1 045.
[17]Cohen,D.JThe very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management:Reasons for the divideand concrete solutions for bridging the gap[J.]Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(5):1 013-1 019.
[18]Shapiro,D L,Kirkman,B L,and Courtney,H G.Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(2):249-266.
[19]Rynes,S L.Let’s create a tipping point:What academics and practitioners can do,alone and together[J].Academy of ManagementJournal,2007b,50(5):1 046-1 054.
[20]Pfeffer,J.A modest proposal:How we might change the process and product of managerial research[J].Academy of ManagementJournal,2007,50(6):1 334-1 345.
引用本文
彭贺. 严密性和实用性:管理学研究双重目标的争论与统一[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2009, 31(1): 9–15.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：试论创业研究的学术贡献及其应用
