Prior entrepreneurship research focuses on determinants of success, while pays insufficient attention to the psychological price of entrepreneurship. Well-being is defined as a positive mental state, including both affective experience and cognitive judgments. It is also an important psychological indicator of entrepreneurial success, and to some extent, it can reflect the psychological price of entrepreneurship. Well-being plays an important role in explaining the entrepreneurs’ persistence while making no profits, learning from failure and even the motivation to try again after failure. Well-being in the entrepreneurship process(hereinafter referred to as entrepreneurial well-being)is defined as a positive state that reflects entrepreneurs’ affective experience and cognitive judgments in the entrepreneurship process. Entrepreneurial well-being not only explains why entrepreneurs persist in entrepreneurship although entrepreneurial failure is a common occurrence, but also provides us a new perspective that helps us understand which benefits entrepreneurs can get except for financial income and mental growth. By searching literature in the entrepreneurship and well-being field, and reading it one by one to confirm whether the literature addresses entrepreneurial well-being, we get 31 studies finally. We review these studies, give the definition of entrepreneurial well-being, compare entrepreneurial well-being with other psychological concepts such as emotion, and summarize its antecedents, consequences, contextual factors, Finally, we propose four directions for future research. First, clarify the definition of entrepreneurial well-being in a different research context, and then develop measures of entrepreneurial well-being. Second, extend research context of entrepreneurial well-being from different perspectives. Specifically, future research should:(1)explore the effects of the ownership structure, female entrepreneurship, social entrepreneurship, informal entrepreneurship or other contexts on the formation of entrepreneurial well-being and their functional mechanisms;(2)pay more attention to the entrepreneurial team formation, entrepreneurial opportunity identification process, or entrepreneurial failure and other entrepreneurial stages. Third, enrich research on the formation mechanism of entrepreneurial well-being, and explore its asymmetry in the process of formation. Specifically, future research should:(1)explore the effects of high initial expectations on entrepreneurial well-being continuously, and justify whether some factors can only bring " without well-being” and other factors can only bring " without ill-being” or not;(2)explore the important role that entrepreneurial well-being plays in the entrepreneurial ecosystem;(3)explore the dynamic formation of entrepreneurial well-being from the sociology perspective; Fourth, explore the antecedents to the combination and balance of entrepreneurial well-being and financial performance.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
Entrepreneurship and Well-being: A Literature Review and Prospects
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 40, Issue 08, pp. 30 - 44 (2018) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.08.003
Summary
References
Summary
1 Carree M A, Verheul I. What makes entrepreneurs happy? Determinants of satisfaction among founders[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2012, 13(2): 371-387. DOI:10.1007/s10902-011-9269-3
2 Cooper A C, Artz K W. Determinants of satisfaction for entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1995, 10(6): 439-457. DOI:10.1016/0883-9026(95)00083-K
3 Dijkhuizen J, Van Veldhoven M, Schalk R. Four types of well-being among entrepreneurs and their relationships with business performance[J]. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2016, 25(2): 184-210. DOI:10.1177/0971355716650369
5 Hahn V C, Frese M, Binnewies C, et al. Happy and proactive? The role of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in business owners’ personal initiative[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2012, 36(1): 97-114. DOI:10.1111/etap.2012.36.issue-1
6 Hmieleski K M, Corbett A C. The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2008, 23(4): 482-496. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.04.002
7 Keyes C L M. Social well-being[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1998, 61(2): 121-140. DOI:10.2307/2787065
8 Rahman S A, Amran A, Ahmad N H, et al. Enhancing the wellbeing of base of the pyramid entrepreneurs through business success: The role of private organizations[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2016, 127(1): 195-216. DOI:10.1007/s11205-015-0951-4
9 Schjoedt L. Entrepreneurial job characteristics: An examination of their effect on entrepreneurial satisfaction[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2009, 33(3): 619-644. DOI:10.1111/etap.2009.33.issue-3
10 Shepherd D A, Cardon M S. Negative emotional reactions to project failure and the self-compassion to learn from the experience[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(6): 923-949. DOI:10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-6
12 Uy M A, Foo M D, Song Z L. Joint effects of prior start-up experience and coping strategies on entrepreneurs’ psychological well-being[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2013, 28(5): 583-597. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.04.003
13 Uy M A, Sun S, Foo M D. Affect spin, entrepreneurs’ well-being, and venture goal progress: The moderating role of goal orientation[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2017, 32(4): 443-460. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.12.001
14 Zhang C Q, Chen C, Li J Z, et al. Entrepreneurs’ failure times and their well-being, moderated by entrepreneurial environment[A]. Proceedings of 2016 Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology(PICMET). Honolulu, HI, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1358-1364.
Cite this article
Yu Xiaoyu, Meng Xiaotong, Cai Li, et al. Entrepreneurship and Well-being: A Literature Review and Prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(8): 30-44.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES