, 1
10585 
8655参与产学研合作对学研机构主体目标的实现（良好学术绩效的取得）是否有帮助？本研究以该议题展开分析并发现产学研合作与学术绩效之间存在倒U形的影响关系，而且它们之间存在两条影响路径，即“产学研合作—基础研究活动—学术绩效”和“产学研合作—技术开发活动—学术绩效”。其中第一条路径：首先学研机构科研团队参与产学研合作对其基础研究活动的开展产生倒U形影响，然后基础研究活动进一步对其学术绩效产生正向影响；第二条路径：首先学研机构科研团队参与产学研合作对其技术开发活动的开展产生正向影响，然后技术开发活动进一步对其学术绩效产生倒U形影响。本研究从学研机构角度揭示了“产学研合作—学术绩效”之间影响“黑箱”，丰富了产学研合作理论研究。
科研团队参与产学研合作对学术绩效的影响路径研究
摘要
参考文献
1 程强. 产学研伙伴异质性对企业合作创新绩效的影响研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2015.
7 吕铁, 贺俊. " 后高铁时代”需加强基础研究和前沿技术研究[J]. 中国发展观察,2016, (13): 35-38 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-033X.2016.13.013
11 吴明隆. SPSS统计应用实务: 问卷分析与应用统计[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.
12 张艺, 陈凯华, 朱桂龙. 中国科学院产学研合作网络特征与影响[J]. 科学学研究,2016, (3): 404-417 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2016.03.011
15 Arza V. Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: Conceptual framework inspired by Latin America[J]. Science and Public Policy,2010, 37(7): 473-484 DOI:10.3152/030234210X511990
16 Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986, 51(6): 1173-1182 DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
17 Capaldo A. Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007, 28(6): 585-608 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
18 Chen K H, Zhang Y, Zhu G L, et al. Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities?[J]. Technovation,2017 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.005
19 D’Este P, Tang P, Mahdi S, et al. The pursuit of academic excellence and business engagement: Is it irreconcilable?[J]. Scientometrics,2013, 95(2): 481-502 DOI:10.1007/s11192-013-0955-2
20 Fan X, Yang X W, Chen L M. Diversified resources and academic influence: Patterns of university-industry collaboration in Chinese research-oriented universities[J]. Scientometrics,2015, 104(2): 489-509 DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1618-2
21 Freitas I M B, Marques R A, de Paula e Silva E M. University-industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries[J]. Research Policy,2013, 42(2): 443-453 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.006
22 Geiger S W, Makri M. Exploration and exploitation innovation processes: The role of organizational slack in R & D intensive firms[J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2006, 17(1): 97-108 DOI:10.1016/j.hitech.2006.05.007
23 George G, Zahra S A, Wood D R Jr. The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2002, 17(6): 577-609 DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6
24 Giuliani E, Morrison A, Pietrobelli C, et al. Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy[J]. Research Policy,2010, 39(6): 748-761 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007
25 Gonzalez-Brambila C N, Veloso F M, Krackhardt D. The impact of network embeddedness on research output[J]. Research Policy,2013, 42(9): 1555-1567 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.008
26 Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1973, 78(6): 1360-1380 DOI:10.1086/225469
27 Kafouros M, Wang C Q, Piperopoulos P, et al. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions[J]. Research Policy,2015, 44(3): 803-817 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.002
28 Levin D Z, Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer[J]. Management Science,2004, 50(11): 1477-1490 DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136
29 Mathews J A, Hu M C. Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: The case of Taiwan[J]. World Development,2007, 35(6): 1005-1020 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.012
30 Perkmann M, Walsh K. The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2009, 18(6): 1033-1065 DOI:10.1093/icc/dtp015
31 Sidhu J S, Commandeur H R, Volberda H W. The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation[J]. Organization Science,2007, 18(1): 20-38 DOI:10.1287/orsc.1060.0212
32 Welsh R, Glenna L, Lacy W, et al. Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism[J]. Research Policy,2008, 37(10): 1854-1864 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.010
33 Zhang Y, Chen K H, Zhu G L, et al. Inter-organizational scientific collaborations and policy effects: An ego-network evolutionary perspective of the Chinese Academy of Sciences[J]. Scientometrics,2016, 108(3): 1383-1415 DOI:10.1007/s11192-016-2022-2
34 Zhao X S, Lynch J G, Chen Q M. Reconsidering baron and kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2010, 37(2): 197-206 DOI:10.1086/651257
引用本文
张艺, 龙明莲, 朱桂龙. 科研团队参与产学研合作对学术绩效的影响路径研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(12): 71-83.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：国际新创企业如何获取国际绩效？
