4445 
3918机器人在人们工作中的应用越来越普遍，尤其是在传统产业升级的背景下，机器人与各行各业进一步深度融合，从而改变了传统的工作场景与组织模式。人机协作引起了学术界和实践界的广泛关注，但是关于人机协作对员工的影响及其产生机制尚缺乏系统的梳理和总结。鉴于此，本文首先对比传统人机交互与当下人机协作，厘清了人机协作的概念内涵，并归纳了其核心要素；然后，从人机协作的要素出发，系统地总结了人机协作引起的员工心理和行为反应；接下来，进一步梳理和评析了现有研究涉及的理论并讨论了理论的使用方式；在此基础上，构建了人机协作对员工影响的研究框架并讨论了未来研究方向。
工作场所人机协作对员工影响的研究述评
摘要
参考文献
1 李磊, 王小霞, 包群. 机器人的就业效应: 机制与中国经验[J]. 管理世界,2021, 37(9): 104-118. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.09.023
3 王才, 周文斌, 赵素芳. 机器人规模应用与工作不安全感——基于员工职业能力调节的研究[J]. 经济管理,2019, 41(4): 111-126. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2019.04.007
4 许怡, 叶欣. 技术升级劳动降级?——基于三家“机器换人”工厂的社会学考察[J]. 社会学研究,2020, 35(3): 23-46. DOI:10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2020.03.002
5 Abubshait A, Wiese E. You look human, but act like a machine: Agent appearance and behavior modulate different aspects of human-robot interaction[J]. Frontiers in Psychology,2017, 8: 1393. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01393
6 Ajoudani A, Zanchettin A M, Ivaldi S, et al. Progress and prospects of the human-robot collaboration[J]. Autonomous Robots,2018, 42(5): 957-975. DOI:10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2
7 Bastien D T. Common patterns of behavior and communication in corporate mergers and acquisitions[J]. Human Resource Management,1987, 26(1): 17-33. DOI:10.1002/hrm.3930260103
8 Bigman Y E, Waytz A, Alterovitz R, et al. Holding robots responsible: The elements of machine morality[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2019, 23(5): 365-368. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.008
9 Bitonneau D, Moulières-Seban T, Dumora J, et al. Design of an industrial human-robot system through participative simulations-tank cleaning case study[A]. Proceedings of 2017 IEEE/SICE international symposium on system integration[C]. Taipei, China: IEEE, 2017.
10 Blau P M. Exchange and power in social life[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
11 Bowlby J. Disruption of affectional bonds and its effects on behavior[J]. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy,1970, 2(2): 75-86. DOI:10.1007/BF02118173
12 Bradley G W. Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1978, 36(1): 56-71. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.56
13 Castellano G, Paiva A, Kappas A, et al. Towards empathic virtual and robotic tutors[A]. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on artificial intelligence in education[C]. Memphis: Springer, 2013.
14 Chandrasekaran B, Conrad J M. Human-robot collaboration: A survey[A]. Proceedings of SoutheastCon 2015[C]. Fort Lauderdale: IEEE, 2015.
15 Charalambous G, Fletcher S, Webb P. Identifying the key organisational human factors for introducing human-robot collaboration in industry: An exploratory study[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2015, 81(9-12): 2143-2155. DOI:10.1007/s00170-015-7335-4
16 Chung C A. Human issues influencing the successful implementation of advanced manufacturing technology[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,1996, 13(3-4): 283-299. DOI:10.1016/S0923-4748(96)01010-7
17 Cooper J M. Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2007.
19 de Visser E, Parasuraman R. Adaptive aiding of human-robot teaming[J]. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making,2011, 5(2): 209-231. DOI:10.1177/1555343411410160
20 Fang H C, Ong S K, Nee A Y C. A novel augmented reality-based interface for robot path planning[J]. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing,2014, 8(1): 33-42. DOI:10.1007/s12008-013-0191-2
21 Feldman R. Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions[J]. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2007, 48(3-4): 329-354. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01701.x
22 Ferrari F, Paladino M P, Jetten J. Blurring human-machine distinctions: Anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics,2016, 8(2): 287-302. DOI:10.1007/s12369-016-0338-y
23 Fink J. Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction[A]. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on social robotics[C]. Chengdu: Springer, 2012.
24 Fox J, Gambino A. Relationship development with humanoid social robots: Applying interpersonal theories to human-robot interaction[J]. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,2021, 24(5): 294-299. DOI:10.1089/cyber.2020.0181
25 Fraser K, Harris H, Luong L. Improving the implementation effectiveness of cellular manufacturing: A comprehensive framework for practitioners[J]. International Journal of Production Research,2007, 45(24): 5835-5856. DOI:10.1080/00207540601159516
26 Fraune M R, Šabanović S, Smith E R. Some are more equal than others: Ingroup robots gain some but not all benefits of team membership[J]. Interaction Studies,2020, 21(3): 303-328. DOI:10.1075/is.18043.fra
27 Freedy A, DeVisser E, Weltman G, et al. Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration[A]. Proceedings of 2007 international symposium on collaborative technologies and systems[C]. Orlando: IEEE, 2007.
28 Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation[A]. Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication[C]. Millbrae: IEEE, 2003.
29 Gray H M, Gray K, Wegner D M. Dimensions of mind perception[J]. Science,2007, 315(5812): 619. DOI:10.1126/science.1134475
30 Gray K, Wegner D M. Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley[J]. Cognition,2012, 125(1): 125-130. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007
31 Griffin M A, Neal A, Parker S K. A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(2): 327-347. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
32 Hancock P A, Billings D R, Schaefer K E, et al. A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,2011, 53(5): 517-527. DOI:10.1177/0018720811417254
33 Harold C M, Oh I S, Holtz B C, et al. Fit and frustration as drivers of targeted counterproductive work behaviors: A multifoci perspective[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2016, 101(11): 1513-1535. DOI:10.1037/apl0000150
34 Hentout A, Aouache M, Maoudj A, et al. Human-robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: A literature review of the decade 2008-2017[J]. Advanced Robotics,2019, 33(15-16): 764-799. DOI:10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714
35 Hoff K A, Bashir M. Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,2015, 57(3): 407-434. DOI:10.1177/0018720814547570
37 Hogg M A, Adelman J. Uncertainty-identity theory: Extreme groups, radical behavior, and authoritarian leadership[J]. Journal of Social Issues,2013, 69(3): 436-454. DOI:10.1111/josi.12023
38 Hvilshøj M, Bøgh S, Nielsen O S, et al. Autonomous industrial mobile manipulation (AIMM): Past, present and future[J]. Industrial Robot,2012, 39(2): 120-135. DOI:10.1108/01439911211201582
39 Hwang J, Park T, Hwang W. The effects of overall robot shape on the emotions invoked in users and the perceived personalities of robot[J]. Applied Ergonomics,2013, 44(3): 459-471. DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.010
40 Isma A, Brahim B. Time-dependant trajectory generation for tele-operated mobile manipulator[A]. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on control, engineering & information technology (CEIT 2015)[C]. Tlemcen: IEEE, 2015.
41 Jenkins S, Draper H. Care, monitoring, and companionship: Views on care robots from older people and their carers[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics,2015, 7(5): 673-683. DOI:10.1007/s12369-015-0322-y
42 Jetten J, Spears R, Manstead A S R. Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996, 71(6): 1222-1233. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222
43 Johnson J R, Bernhagen M J, Miller V, et al. The role of communication in managing reductions in work force[J]. Journal of Applied Communication Research,1996, 24(3): 139-164. DOI:10.1080/00909889609365448
44 Kaplan F. Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots[J]. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics,2004, 1(3): 465-480. DOI:10.1142/S0219843604000289
45 Kim Y, Mutlu B. How social distance shapes human-robot interaction[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2014, 72(12): 783-795. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.05.005
46 Klein K J, Conn A B, Sorra J S. Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2001, 86(5): 811-824. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.811
47 Koceski S, Koceska N. Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare[J]. Journal of Medical Systems,2016, 40(5): 121. DOI:10.1007/s10916-016-0481-x
48 Krämer N C, von der Pütten A, Eimler S. Human-agent and human-robot interaction theory: Similarities to and differences from human-human interaction[A]. Zacarias M, Oliveira J V. Human-computer interaction: The agency perspective[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
49 Ku J, Jang H J, Kim K U, et al. Experimental results of affective valence and arousal to avatar’s facial expressions[J]. Cyberpsychology & Behavior,2005, 8(5): 493-503.
50 Kulic D, Croft E A. Affective state estimation for human-robot interaction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics,2007, 23(5): 991-1000. DOI:10.1109/TRO.2007.904899
51 Kuster D, Kappas A. What could a body tell a social robot that it does not know?[A]. Proceedings of international conference on physiological computing systems[C]. Lisbon: SciTePress, 2014.
52 Lee J D, See K A. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,2004, 46(1): 50-80. DOI:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
53 Madhavan P, Wiegmann D A. Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,2007, 8(4): 277-301. DOI:10.1080/14639220500337708
54 Mahzoon H, Ogawa K, Yoshikawa Y, et al. Effect of self-representation of interaction history by the robot on perceptions of mind and positive relationship: A case study on a home-use robot[J]. Advanced Robotics,2019, 33(21): 1112-1128. DOI:10.1080/01691864.2019.1676823
56 Miller D T, Ross M. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1975, 82(2): 213-225. DOI:10.1037/h0076486
58 Odette K, Rivera J, Phillips E K, et al. Robot self-assessment and expression: A learning framework[J]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting,2017, 61(1): 1188-1192. DOI:10.1177/1541931213601780
59 Papadopoulos F, Küster D, Corrigan L J, et al. Do relative positions and proxemics affect the engagement in a human-robot collaborative scenario?[J]. Interaction Studies,2016, 17(3): 321-347. DOI:10.1075/is.17.3.01pap
60 Parasuraman R, Manzey D H. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: An attentional integration[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,2010, 52(3): 381-410. DOI:10.1177/0018720810376055
61 Parasuraman R, Riley V. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,1997, 39(2): 230-253. DOI:10.1518/001872097778543886
62 Quadflieg S, Ul-Haq I, Mavridis N. Now you feel it, now you don’t[J]. Interaction Studies,2016, 17(2): 211-247. DOI:10.1075/is.17.2.03qua
64 Riek B M, Mania E W, Gaertner S L. Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2006, 10(4): 336-353. DOI:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
65 Rosenthal-Von Der Pütten A, Weiss A. The uncanny valley phenomenon: Does it affect all of us?[J]. Interaction Studies,2015, 16(2): 206-214. DOI:10.1075/is.16.2.07ros
66 Savela N, Turja T, Oksanen A. Social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields: A systematic literature review[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics,2018, 10(4): 493-502. DOI:10.1007/s12369-017-0452-5
67 Schmidtler J, Knott V, Hölzel C, et al. Human centered assistance applications for the working environment of the future[J]. Occupational Ergonomics,2015, 12(3): 83-95. DOI:10.3233/OER-150226
69 Sherony K M, Green S G. Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2002, 87(3): 542-548. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.542
70 Singh R K, Garg S K, Deshmukh S G, et al. Modelling of critical success factors for implementation of AMTs[J]. Journal of Modelling in Management,2007, 2(3): 232-250. DOI:10.1108/17465660710834444
71 Smith E R, Murphy J, Coats S. Attachment to groups: Theory and management[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1999, 77(1): 94-110. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.94
72 Srite M, Karahanna E. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance[J]. MIS Quarterly,2006, 30(3): 679-704. DOI:10.2307/25148745
73 Tajfel H, Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict[A]. Austin W G, Worchel S. The social psychology of intergroup relations[M]. Monterey: Brooks/Cole, 1979.
74 Tajfel H, Turner J C. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior[A]. Worchel S, Austin W G. Psychology of intergroup relations[M]. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 1986.
75 Terry D J, Jimmieson N L. A stress and coping approach to organisational change: Evidence from three field studies[J]. Australian Psychologist,2003, 38(2): 92-101. DOI:10.1080/00050060310001707097
76 Thepsoonthorn C, Ogawa K I, Miyake Y. The relationship between robot’s nonverbal behaviour and human’s likability based on human’s personality[J]. Scientific Reports,2018, 8(1): 8435. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-25314-x
77 Vasalya A, Ganesh G, Kheddar A. Distinct motor contagions during and after observation of actions by a humanoid co-worker[A]. Proceedings of the 27th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication[C]. Nanjing: IEEE, 2018.
78 Vogeley K, Bente G. “Artificial humans”: Psychology and neuroscience perspectives on embodiment and nonverbal communication[J]. Neural Networks,2010, 23(8-9): 1077-1090. DOI:10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.003
79 Wall T D, Cordery J L, Clegg C W. Empowerment, performance, and operational uncertainty: A theoretical integration[J]. Applied Psychology,2002, 51(1): 146-169. DOI:10.1111/1464-0597.00083
80 Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion[J]. Psychological Review,1985, 92(4): 548-573. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
81 Willemse C J A M, van Erp J B F. Social touch in human-robot interaction: Robot-initiated touches can induce positive responses without extensive prior bonding[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics,2019, 11(2): 285-304. DOI:10.1007/s12369-018-0500-9
82 Worley J M, Doolen T L. The role of communication and management support in a lean manufacturing implementation[J]. Management Decision,2006, 44(2): 228-245. DOI:10.1108/00251740610650210
83 Yagoda R E, Gillan D J. You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a human-robot interaction trust scale[J]. International Journal of Social Robotics,2012, 4(3): 235-248. DOI:10.1007/s12369-012-0144-0
84 Złotowski J, Yogeeswaran K, Bartneck C. Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2017, 100: 48-54. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.12.008
引用本文
王振源, 姚明辉. 工作场所人机协作对员工影响的研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(9): 86-102.
导出参考文献，格式为：
