9355 
6325共享心智模式已成为预测企业创新团队绩效的重要指标。不过，在今天复杂动荡的环境下，学界对创新团队的共享心智模式如何应对创新柔性与效率之间的冲突问题一直缺乏清晰的解释，对共享心智模式的实质内涵的理解也存在着争议。本文立足心智模式理论和组织学习理论，采用文献比对和理论演绎方法，尝试构建二元情境下的创新团队心智模式共享机制。本文分析发现二元创新团队的共享心智存在多组悖论，并在此基础上建立起两组选择性耦合机制：（1）统一的抽象层二元心智模式匹配自由沟通、互补任务和同质知识模式的共享；（2）统一的抽象层二元心智模式匹配具体层规范沟通、相近任务和异质知识模式的共享。然后推导出基于“感知—加工—内化—修正—沟通”的团队心智共享过程。研究从心智模式的路径完善了情境二元性理论的构建，并为二元组织共享心智模式的培育提供了指导模型。
二元创新团队的共享心智模式：悖论、机制与过程
摘要
参考文献
3 熊立, 谢奉军, 潘求丰, 等. 柔性机制与二元创新驱动力构建[J]. 科学学研究,2017, (6): 940-948. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2017.06.016
5 An D G, Song Y, Carr M. A comparison of two models of creativity: Divergent thinking and creative expert performance[J]. Personality and Individual Differences,2016, 90: 78-84. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.040
6 Jansen J P, Kostopoulos K C, Mihalache O R, et al. A socio-psychological perspective on team ambidexterity: The contingency role of supportive leadership behaviour[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2016, 53(6): 939-965. DOI:10.1111/joms.2016.53.issue-6
7 Lee C F, Chuang S C, Chiu C K, et al. The influence of task difficulty on context effect-compromise and attraction effects[J]. Current Psychology,2017, 36(3): 392-409. DOI:10.1007/s12144-016-9428-0
9 Mahmoud-Jouini S B, Midler C, Silberzahn P. Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context[J]. Project Management Journal,2016, 47(2): 144-156. DOI:10.1002/pmj.21577
10 Monks K, Conway E, Fu N, et al. Enhancing knowledge exchange and combination through HR practices: Reflexivity as a translation process[J]. Human Resource Management Journal,2016, 26(3): 304-320. DOI:10.1111/hrmj.v26.3
11 Nissen H A, Evald M R, Clarke A H. Knowledge sharing in heterogeneous teams through collaboration and cooperation: Exemplified through Public-Private-Innovation partnerships[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2014, 43(3): 473-482. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.015
13 Revilla E, Rodríguez-Prado B. Building ambidexterity through creativity mechanisms: Contextual drivers of innovation success[J]. Research Policy,2018, 47(9): 1611-1625. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.009
14 Schmidtke J M, Cummings A. The effects of virtualness on teamwork behavioral components: The role of shared mental models[J]. Human Resource Management Review,2017, 27(4): 660-677. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.011
15 Scott R J, Cavana R Y, Cameron D. Mechanisms for understanding mental model change in group model building[J]. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,2016, 33(1): 100-118. DOI:10.1002/sres.2303
16 Sok P, O’Cass A. Examining the new product innovation-performance relationship: Optimizing the role of individual-level creativity and attention-to-detail[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2015, 47: 156-165. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.040
17 Sun W D, Mollaoglu S, Miller V, et al. Communication behaviors to implement innovations: How do AEC teams communicate in IPD projects?[J]. Project Management Journal,2015, 46(1): 84-96. DOI:10.1002/pmj.21478
18 Tempelaar M P, Rosenkranz N A. Switching hats: The effect of role transition on individual ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Management,2017, 45(4): 1517-1539.
19 Wang C L, Rafiq M. Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms[J]. British Journal of Management,2014, 25(1): 58-76. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x
21 Willems J. Building shared mental models of organizational effectiveness in leadership teams[J]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,2016, 45(3): 568-592. DOI:10.1177/0899764015601244
引用本文
熊立. 二元创新团队的共享心智模式：悖论、机制与过程[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(7): 58-71.
导出参考文献，格式为：
