With the rapid development of new generation ICT such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, cloud computing, big data and Internet of things, innovation activities can no longer be conducted by pre-determined participants according to the traditional linear process. In digital economy, the enterprise can use more and more resources. Based on this, the enterprise needs to develop new capabilities, strategies, systems, etc., in order to meet the personalized needs of users. The innovation model, known as “digital innovation”, reshapes physical products and the logic of value creation of enterprises, and even reshapes the form of business. Actually there is a lack of research in digital innovation based on value creation. This paper systematically reviews the researches on digital innovation at home and abroad, which provides a useful reference for accelerating the research on digital innovation and carrying out digital innovation practice in China. It focuses on the following three questions: “what is digital innovation” “why can it create value” and “how to create value”. In terms of “what is digital innovation”, this paper introduces the concept, definition, characteristics of digital innovation and relationship with IT innovation. On the aspect of “why can digital innovation create value”, this paper explains and develops the theory from the three perspectives of subject, structure and action. In terms of “how to create value”, this paper sorts out three ways: efficiency, convergence and generativity. Although some new studies have recognized that the stages of digital innovation are not clearly defined, the theoretical framework does not reflect this. The existing research also fails to clearly explain the value creation logic of digital innovation. Through the content analysis of the literature, this paper summarizes the concept connotation of digital innovation from different perspectives, summarizes its characteristics, and sorts out the connection and difference between digital innovation, IS innovation and IT innovation. On this basis, the theoretical perspective and mechanism of value creation of digital innovation are sorted out. Finally, the future research of digital innovation is prospected from the perspectives of research level, research method, research theory and research object. To sum up, this paper believes that digital innovation research has developed from the discussion stage of basic issues such as concept definition to the research stage of multiple perspectives such as analysis of causes and consequences, and is forming an integrated analysis framework. In terms of concept connotation, the definition of digital innovation gradually turns to comprehensive consideration from the dichotomy of result and process. The theory of value creation is explained and developed from three perspectives: subject, architecture and action. In terms of the way of value creation, there are three ways: efficiency, integration and production. Around the three questions of digital innovation mentioned above, the contribution of this paper is mainly manifested in three aspects: First, through content analysis and systemic literature review, the digital innovation research at home and abroad are reviewed; Second, it provides a useful reference for accelerating the research and practice of digital innovation in China; Third, it summarizes the shortcomings of existing researches on digital innovation, and proposes specific and feasible research directions in many aspects, which lay a foundation for future researches on digital innovation by domestic scholars.
/ Journals / Foreign Economics & Management
Foreign Economics & Management
LiZengquan, Editor-in-Chief
ZhengChunrong, Vice Executive Editor-in-Chief
YinHuifang HeXiaogang LiuJianguo, Vice Editor-in-Chief
A Literature Review of Digital Innovation: Concept and Value Creation
Foreign Economics & Management Vol. 42, Issue 09, pp. 19 - 31 (2020) DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200601.401
Summary
References
Summary
[1] Chen Guoqing, Wu Gang, Gu Yuandong, et al. The challenges for big data driven research and applications in the context of managerial decisions [J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, (7) : 1-10.
[2] Dai Yishu, Ye Lisa, Dong Xiaoying, et al. The Development of CPS and Future Manufacturing Industry:A Comparative Study of Chinese, German and American Policies and Capacity Building [J]. China Soft Science, 2018, (2) : 11-20.
[3] Gong Limin, Jiang Shisong. Strategic Management Research Frontier of Platform-based Business Ecosystems:Perspectives and Themes [J]. Foreign Economies and Management, 2016, (6) : 38-50,62
[4] Li Wenlian, Xia Jianming. Business Model Innovation Based on “Big Data” [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2013, (5) : 83-95.
[5] Xiao Jinghua, Wu Yao, Liu Yi, et al. New Product Development Innovation with Customer Digitalized Engagement:A Comparative Case Study from the Firm-Customer Coevolutionary Perspective [J]. Management World, 2018, (8) : 154-173, 192.
[6] Yang Shanlin, Zhou Kaile. Management issues in Big Data: The resource-based view of Big Data [J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2015, (5) : 1-8.
[7] Yu Jiang, Meng Qingshi, Zhang Yue et al. Digital innovation: Exploration and enlightenment of the new perspective of innovation research [J]. Studies in science of science, 2017, (7) : 1103-1111.
[8] Abrell T, Pihlajamaa M, Kanto L, et al. The role of users and customers in digital innovation: Insights from B2B manufacturing firms[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(3): 324-335.
[9] Adner R. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(1): 39-58.
[10] Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J C, Gupta A, et al. Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2008, 32(4): 779-809.
[11] Akaka M A, Vargo S L. Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems[J]. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 2014, 12(3): 367-384.
[12] Arakji R Y, Lang K R. Digital consumer networks and producer-consumer collaboration: Innovation and product development in the video game industry[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007, 24(2): 195-219.
[13] Austin R D, Devin L, Sullivan E E. Accidental innovation: Supporting valuable unpredictability in the creative process[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1505-1522.
[14] Barrett M, Davidson E, Prabhu J, et al. Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2015, 39(1): 135-154.
[15] Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski W J, et al. Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1448-1466.
[16] Boland R J, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(4): 631-647.
[17] Chesbrough H W, Appleyard M M. Open innovation and strategy[J]. California Management Review, 2007, 50(1): 57-76.
[18] Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker G G. Introduction-platforms and infrastructures in the digital age[J]. Information Systems Research, 2018, 29(2): 381-400.
[19] Fichman R G, Nambisan S, Halpern M. Configurational thinking and value creation from digital innovation: The case of product lifecycle management implementation[A]. Rowe F, Te’eni D. Innovation and IT in an international context[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014a.
[20] Fichman R G, Santos B L D, Zheng Z Q. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2014b, 38(2): 329-353.
[21] Fichman R G. Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice[J]. Information Systems Research, 2004, 15(2): 132-154.
[22] Flath C M, Friesike S, Wirth M, et al. Copy, transform, combine: Exploring the remix as a form of innovation[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2017, 32(4): 306-325.
[23] Gao L S, Iyer B. Analyzing complementarities using software stacks for software industry acquisitions[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2006, 23(2): 119-147.
[24] Gawer A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014, 2014(1): 11751.
[25] Grover V, Kohli R. Cocreating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for Multifirm environments[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36(1): 225-232.
[26] Henfridsson O, Mathiassen L, Svahn F. Managing technological change in the digital age: The role of architectural frames[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2014, 29(1): 27-43.
[27] Henfridsson O, Nandhakumar J, Scarbrough H, et al. Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(2): 89-100.
[28] Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective[J]. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(1), 52–61.
[29] Hitt L M, Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value[J]. MIS Quarterly, 1996, 20(2): 121-142.
[30] Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu M J, et al. Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 301-314.
[31] Jacobides M G, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(8): 2255-2276.
[32] Jahanmir S F, Cavadas J. Factors affecting late adoption of digital innovations[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 88: 337-343.
[33] Jeyaraj A, Rottman J W, Lacity M C. A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2006, 21(1): 1-23.
[34] Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A. The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(2): 357-370.
[35] Kohli R, Grover V. Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008, 9(1): 23-39.
[36] Kohli R, Melville N P. Digital innovation: A review and synthesis[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2019, 29(1): 200-223.
[37] Lehrer C, Wieneke A, Vom Brocke J, et al. How big data analytics enables service innovation: Materiality, affordance, and the individualization of service[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2018, 35(2): 424-460.
[38] Lusch R F, Nambisan S. Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2015, 39(1): 155-175.
[39] Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238.
[40] Nambisan S. Architecture vs. Ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization, 2018, 28(2): 104-106.
[41] Orlikowski W J. Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2006, 15(5): 460-466.
[42] Parker G G, Van Alstyne M W. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(10): 1494-1504.
[43] Sarker S, Sarker S, Sahaym A, et al. Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2012, 36(1): 317-338.
[44] Scholz J, Smith A N. Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement[J]. Business Horizons, 2016, 59(2): 149-161.
[45] Skog D A, Wimelius H, Sandberg J. Digital disruption[J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2018, 60(5): 431-437.
[46] Susarla A, Oh J H, Tan Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube[J]. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23(1): 23-41.
[47] Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How volvo cars managed competing concerns[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 239-253.
[48] Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Research commentary-digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 748-759.
[49] Vaccaro A, Brusoni S, Veloso F M. Virtual design, problem framing, and innovation: An empirical study in the automotive industry[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(1): 99-122.
[50] Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2004, 68(1), 1–17.
[51] Von Briel F, Davidsson P, Recker J. Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2018, 42(1): 47-69.
[52] Yoo Y, Boland Jr R J, Lyytinen K, et al. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(5): 1398-1408.
[53] Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research commentary-the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735.
[54] Yoo Y. Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(2): 213-231.
[55] Zittrain J L. The generative internet[J]. Harvard Law Review, 2006, 119(7): 1974-2040.
Cite this article
Xie Weihong, Lin Peiwang, Li Zhongshun, et al. A Literature Review of Digital Innovation: Concept and Value Creation[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(9): 19-31.
Export Citations as:
For
ISSUE COVER
RELATED ARTICLES