296 
300技术要素市场化既是完善市场经济体制的重要内容，也是实现高水平科技自立自强、加快构建新发展格局的重要手段。本文以国家技术转移中心设立作为技术要素市场化的冲击场景，考察技术要素市场化对企业全要素生产率的影响。研究发现，技术要素市场化能够显著提升企业全要素生产率。机制检验发现，上述效应主要通过推动技术溢出、激励企业创新、深化专业化分工得以实现。异质性分析发现，对于获得政府补助较多、隶属高科技行业、所在行业竞争程度较高以及所在地区产品市场发育程度较高的企业，技术要素市场化对企业全要素生产率的促进作用更加明显。本文的研究结论具有重要的理论和实践意义，不仅为技术要素市场化的微观经济效应提供新的见解，也为政府部门推动企业生产效率提升提供经验证据。
技术要素市场化与企业全要素生产率——基于国家技术转移中心设立的视角
摘要
参考文献
4 胡珺, 方祺, 龙文滨. 碳排放规制、企业减排激励与全要素生产率——基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4): 77-94.
5 黄勃, 李海彤, 江萍, 等. 战略联盟、要素流动与企业全要素生产率提升[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(10): 195-211. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.10.023
6 龙小宁, 刘灵子, 张靖. 企业合作研发模式对创新质量的影响——基于中国专利数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (10): 174-192.
7 吕桁宇, 马春爱, 汤桐, 等. 政府创新补助对工业企业碳强度影响路径研究——一个链式多重中介模型检验[J]. 会计研究, 2024, (4): 150-164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2024.04.011
8 邱煜, 伍勇强, 唐曼萍. 数字化转型与企业供应链依赖[J]. 中国软科学, 2023, (10): 215-224.
9 邵汉华, 王瑶, 罗俊. 技术市场发展促进了产学研深度融合吗?[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(11): 99-108.
10 石琦, 肖淑芳, 吴佳颖. 股票期权及其要素设计与企业创新产出——基于风险承担与业绩激励效应的研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(2): 27-38,62.
11 王嘉鑫. 强制性内部控制审计、企业创新与经济增长[J]. 会计研究, 2020, (5): 166-177. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2020.05.012
12 韦钦文, 孙宁华. 技术市场发展赋能高技术企业创新效率的效应与机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2025, 22(7): 1289-1297.
13 吴伟伟, 张天一. 非研发补贴与研发补贴对新创企业创新产出的非对称影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 137-160.
14 谢红军, 张禹, 洪俊杰, 等. 鼓励关键设备进口的创新效应——兼议中国企业的创新路径选择[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (4): 100-118. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2021.04.006
15 徐巍, 梁上坤, 钱宇航. 资本市场出清与实体经济投资——基于上市公司强制退市的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(8): 185-200. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2025.08.012
16 余明桂, 王俐璇, 赵文婷, 等. 专利质押、融资约束与企业劳动雇佣[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(9): 70-93. DOI:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2022.09.009
17 于荣光, 王宏伟. 技术市场对我国高技术产业创新链的影响[J]. 经济与管理, 2025, 39(1): 58-68.
18 袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工: 专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (9): 137-155.
19 郑曼妮, 黎文靖, 谭有超. 技术转移与企业高质量创新[J]. 世界经济, 2024, 47(3): 66-93. DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2024.03.006
20 Acemoglu D. Directed technical change[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69(4): 781-809. DOI:10.1111/1467-937X.00226
21 Audretsch D B, Feldman M P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J]. The American Economic Review, 1996, 86(3): 630-640.
22 Azagra-Caro J M, Barberá-Tomás D, Edwards-Schachter M, et al. Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(2): 463-474. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.011
23 Bergh P, Thorgren S, Wincent J. Entrepreneurs learning together: The importance of building trust for learning and exploiting business opportunities[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2011, 7(1): 17-37. DOI:10.1007/s11365-009-0120-9
24 Caviggioli F, Ughetto E. The drivers of patent transactions: Corporate views on the market for patents[J]. R& D Management, 2013, 43(4): 318-332. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2144107
25 Cengiz D, Dube A, Lindner A, et al. The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019, 134(3): 1405-1454. DOI:10.1093/qje/qjz014
26 Coase R H. The nature of the firm[J]. Economica, 1937, 4(16): 386-405. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
27 De Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfoeuille X. Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects[J]. American Economic Review, 2020, 110(9): 2964-2996. DOI:10.1257/aer.20181169
28 De Marco A, Scellato G, Ughetto E, et al. Global markets for technology: Evidence from patent transactions[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(9): 1644-1654. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.015
29 De Rassenfosse G, Grazzi M, Moschella D, et al. International patent protection and trade: Transaction-level evidence[J]. European Economic Review, 2022, 147: 104160. DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104160
30 Ding X G, Sheng Z L, Appolloni A, et al. Digital transformation, ESG practice, and total factor productivity[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2024, 33(5): 4547-4561. DOI:10.1002/bse.3718
31 Du H B, Liang X J, Yu M Y, et al. How does ESG dimensional imbalance affect firm innovation?[J]. Technovation, 2026, 150: 103439. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103439
32 Fang H S, Zhang X F, Guo L. Productivity effects of corporate income tax: Evidence from China[J]. The World Economy, 2023, 46(6): 1815-1842. DOI:10.1111/twec.13328
33 Figueroa N, Serrano C J. Patent trading flows of small and large firms[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(7): 1601-1616. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.002
34 Galasso A, Schankerman M, Serrano C J. Trading and enforcing patent rights[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2013, 44(2): 275-312. DOI:10.1111/1756-2171.12020
35 Gao P, Lei Y H. Communication infrastructure and stabilizing food prices: Evidence from the telegraph network in China[J]. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2021, 13(3): 65-101. DOI:10.1257/app.20190416
36 Goodman-Bacon A. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225(2): 254-277. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
37 Han P F, Liu C R, Tian X. Does trading spur specialization? evidence from patenting[J]. Management Science, 2026, 72(5): 4419-4434. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03174
38 Harhoff D, Scherer F M, Vopel K. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(8): 1343-1363. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
39 Hegde D, Luo H. Patent publication and the market for ideas[J]. Management Science, 2018, 64(2): 652-672. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2622
40 Jin P Z, Mangla S K, Song M L. The power of innovation diffusion: How patent transfer affects urban innovation quality[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 145: 414-425. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.025
41 Jones C I. The past and future of economic growth: A semi-endogenous perspective[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2022, 14(1): 125-152. DOI:10.1146/annurev-economics-080521-012458
42 Karhunen H, Huovari J. R&D subsidies and productivity in SMEs[J]. Small Business Economics, 2015, 45(4): 805-823. DOI:10.1007/s11187-015-9658-9
43 Kong D M, Lin C, Wei L, et al. Information accessibility and corporate innovation[J]. Management Science, 2022, 68(11): 7837-7860. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4224
44 Kwon S. How does patent transfer affect innovation of firms?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 154: 119959. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119959
45 Lai S J, Yang L F, Wang Q, et al. Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2023, 80: 102424. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102424
46 Lanjouw J O, Schankerman M. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J]. The Economic Journal, 2004, 114(495): 441-465. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
47 Lemley M A, Feldman R. Patent licensing, technology transfer, and innovation[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(5): 188-192. DOI:10.1257/aer.p20161092
48 Li H J, Zhang Y, Li Y. The impact of the digital economy on the total factor productivity of manufacturing firms: Empirical evidence from China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 207: 123604. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123604
49 Li P, Lu Y, Wang J. Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 123: 18-37. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.07.002
50 Liu W W, Tao Y, Bi K X. Capturing information on global knowledge flows from patent transfers: An empirical study using USPTO patents[J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(5): 104509. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104509
51 Madsen J M, McMullin J L. Economic consequences of risk disclosures: Evidence from crowdfunding[J]. The Accounting Review, 2020, 95(4): 331-363. DOI:10.2308/accr-52641
52 Messinis G, Ahmed A D. Cognitive skills, innovation and technology diffusion[J]. Economic Modelling, 2013, 30: 565-578. DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.10.002
53 Montmartin B, Herrera M. Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(5): 1065-1079. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
54 Shen H J, Coreynen W, Huang C. Prestige and technology-transaction prices: Evidence from patent-selling by Chinese universities[J]. Technovation, 2023, 123: 102710. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102710
55 Shive S A, Forster M M. Corporate governance and pollution externalities of public and private firms[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2020, 33(3): 1296-1330. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhz079
56 Wu X K, Yu J P. Does dialect difference impede patent transaction? Evidence from China's inter-city patent license data[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 187: 122197. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122197
57 Yu M Y, Hu M, Du H B, et al. Green manufacturing lists and firms’ green and low-carbon technological innovation: Evidence from China[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2026, 62(2): 624-636. DOI:10.1080/1540496X.2025.2540879
58 Zhao X, Liu G Q, Zhao X R. Tax incentives, financial subsidies and high-quality development of enterprises[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2025, 86: 108350. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2025.108350
引用本文
刘晨, 吕可夫. 技术要素市场化与企业全要素生产率——基于国家技术转移中心设立的视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(7): 82-99.
导出参考文献，格式为：
