3976 
3544所谓地位是指不同受众对个体或组织在社会系统中所处位置的社会评价。地位的背后是政治、经济和社会制度所赋予的权力差异，这在社会网络中得以体现并发挥作用，使得社会网络与地位密不可分。聚焦地位与网络的交叉研究，本文系统地梳理了相关文献，从网络伙伴选择、网络关系构建、网络结构属性以及网络运营管理四个方面构建了用以进行地位研究解析的文献分析框架，搭建了网络研究与地位概念间的整合研究框架，并从低地位研究、地位成因研究、动态地位研究、地位维护研究四个维度提出关于地位的未来研究方向，以及新情境下地位研究的新问题。本文综合呈现了地位研究的现有成果，对于把握网络视角下地位研究的进展，为网络与地位的交叉研究提供有前景的方向引导具有重要的理论意义。
组织间网络视角下地位研究的发展脉络与未来研究展望
摘要
参考文献
1 Adner R. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy[J]. Journal of Management,2017, 43(1): 39-58. DOI:10.1177/0149206316678451
2 Baron R A, Tang J T, Tang Z, et al. Bribes as entrepreneurial actions: Why underdog entrepreneurs feel compelled to use them[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2018, 33(6): 679-690. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.011
3 Bhattacharya H, Dugar S. Partnership formation: The role of social status[J]. Management Science,2014, 60(5): 1130-1147. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1818
4 Blader S L, Chen Y R. What influences how higher-status people respond to lower-status others? Effects of procedural fairness, outcome favorability, and concerns about status[J]. Organization Science,2011, 22(4): 1040-1060. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0558
5 Bothner M S, Kim Y K, Smith E B. How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR[J]. Organization Science,2012, 23(2): 416-433. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1110.0679
6 Bowers A, Prato M. The structural origins of unearned status: How arbitrary changes in categories affect status position and market impact[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2018, 63(3): 668-699. DOI:10.1177/0001839217727706
7 Ertug G, Yogev T, Lee Y, et al. The art of representation: How reputation affects success with different audiences in the contemporary art field[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(1): 113-134. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0621
8 Gray B, Kish-Gephart J J. Encountering social class differences at work: How “class work” perpetuates inequality[J]. Academy of Management Review,2013, 38(4): 670-699. DOI:10.5465/amr.2012.0143
9 Hubbard T D, Pollock T G, Pfarrer M D, et al. Safe bets or hot hands? How status and celebrity influence strategic alliance formations by newly public firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2018, 61(5): 1976-1999. DOI:10.5465/amj.2016.0438
10 Lanzolla G, Frankort H T W. The online shadow of offline signals: Which sellers get contacted in online B2B marketplaces?[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(1): 207-231. DOI:10.5465/amj.2014.0051
11 Lynn F B, Podolny J M, Tao L. A Sociological (De) construction of the relationship between status and quality[J]. American Journal of Sociology,2009, 115(3): 755-804. DOI:10.1086/603537
12 Magee J C, Galinsky A D. Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2008, 2(1): 351-398. DOI:10.5465/19416520802211628
13 Malter D. On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status: Evidence from the grands crus classés of the médoc[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2014, 59(2): 271-300. DOI:10.1177/0001839214532428
14 Miller D, Breton-Miller I L. Underdog entrepreneurs: A model of challenge-based entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2017, 41(1): 7-17. DOI:10.1111/etap.12253
15 Paolella L, Durand R. Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(1): 330-351. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0651
16 Pearce J. Status in management and organizations[J]. Management Decision,2011, 49(6): 1024-1028. DOI:10.1108/00251741111143667
17 Pettit N C, Yong K, Spataro S E. Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status gains and losses[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2010, 46(2): 396-401. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.007
18 Phillips N, Tracey P, Karra N. Building entrepreneurial tie portfolios through strategic homophily: The role of narrative identity work in venture creation and early growth[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2013, 28(1): 134-150. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.12.002
19 Piazza A, Castellucci F. Status in organization and management theory[J]. Journal of Management,2014, 40(1): 287-315. DOI:10.1177/0149206313498904
20 Prato M, Kypraios E, Ertug G, et al. Middle-status conformity revisited: The interplay between achieved and ascribed status[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2019, 62(4): 1003-1027. DOI:10.5465/amj.2017.0316
21 Reschke B P, Azoulay P, Stuart T E. Status spillovers: The effect of status-conferring prizes on the allocation of attention[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2018, 63(4): 819-847. DOI:10.1177/0001839217731997
22 Sauder M, Lynn F, Podolny J M. Status: Insights from organizational sociology[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,2012, 38(1): 267-283. DOI:10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145503
23 Shipilov A, Godart F C, Clement J. Which boundaries? How mobility networks across countries and status groups affect the creative performance of organizations[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2017, 38(6): 1232-1252. DOI:10.1002/smj.2602
24 Williams T A, Shepherd D A. Victim entrepreneurs doing well by doing good: Venture creation and well-being in the aftermath of a resource shock[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2016, 31(4): 365-387. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.04.002
25 Zhelyazkov P I, Gulati R. After the break-up: The relational and reputational consequences of withdrawals from venture capital syndicates[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(1): 277-301. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0768
引用本文
韩炜, 姚博闻. 组织间网络视角下地位研究的发展脉络与未来研究展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(5): 139-152.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：迁移创业者：一个分类研究框架
