数据知识产权保护与企业数据技术创新——来自生成式大语言模型的经验证据

Data Intellectual Property Protection and Enterprise Data Technology Innovation: Empirical Evidence from a Generative Large Language Model

杨靖,陈志斌,封思贤

2026 第 48 卷 第 08 期 页码 95-112

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20260420.401

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

企业数据技术创新是实现数据要素价值转化的关键路径,然而,数据知识产权保护能否以及如何有效激励企业开展数据技术创新,尚缺乏系统的实证检验。本文以全国首批数据知识产权工作试点为准自然实验,利用2015—2024年A股上市公司数据,运用大语言模型识别企业的数据技术专利,构建双重差分模型考察数据知识产权保护对企业数据技术创新的影响。研究发现,数据知识产权工作试点显著促进了企业数据技术创新。机制检验表明,数据知识产权保护主要通过激励专用要素投入和促进知识溢出发挥作用。异质性分析显示,该促进效应在国有企业、数据原生企业以及数字基础设施较完善地区更为突出,在不同科创属性企业间未呈现显著差异。经济后果分析表明,数据知识产权保护通过促进企业数据技术创新,进而提升了企业全要素生产率。研究为理解数据知识产权保护的微观创新效应提供了新证据,对建设全国一体化数据市场、培育新质生产力与推动数字经济高质量发展具有重要政策启示。

Enterprise data technology innovation is a crucial process for realizing the value conversion of data elements. However, there is still a lack of systematic empirical research on how to effectively incentivize it through data intellectual property protection. Based on data from China’s A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2024, this paper innovatively employs a generative large language model to identify enterprise data technology patents. Using the first batch of national pilot projects for data intellectual property as a quasi-natural experiment, it constructs a DID model to systematically assess the impact of data intellectual property protection on enterprise data technology innovation. The results show that the data intellectual property pilot significantly promotes enterprise data technology innovation. Mechanism testing indicates that this effect is primarily realized through incentivizing specialized factor inputs and facilitating knowledge spillovers. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the promoting effect is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, data-native enterprises, and regions with better-developed digital infrastructure, while no significant difference is observed among enterprises with different technological innovation attributes. Further research demonstrates that by fostering enterprise data technology innovation, data intellectual property protection effectively enhances enterprise TFP. This paper provides new evidence for understanding the micro-level innovation effect of data intellectual property protection and offers important policy implications for building a unified national data market, cultivating new quality productive forces, and promoting high-quality development of the digital economy.

参考文献

1 蔡跃洲, 马文君. 数据要素对高质量发展影响与数据流动制约[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(3): 64-83.
9 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (5): 100-120. DOI:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.05.005
11 刘青, 肖柏高. 劳动力成本与劳动节约型技术创新——来自AI语言模型和专利文本的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2): 74-90.
12 彭正银, 楚伯微, 罗贯擎, 等. 数据专用性对平台包络的影响效应研究[J]. 经济管理, 2024, 46(5): 72-91. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2024.05.004
14 史丹, 孙光林. 数据要素与新质生产力: 基于企业全要素生产率视角[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2024, 44(4): 12-30. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-596X.2024.04.002
16 陶锋, 翟少轩, 王峤. 数字经济政策与传统企业跨界数字创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025, (2): 118-136. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2025.02.007
17 王伟玲. 中国数据产权制度构建研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2024, (1): 78-85. DOI:10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.202401078
19 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144,10. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0097
23 姚加权, 张锟澎, 郭李鹏, 等. 人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?——基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(2): 101-116,133. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2024.0018
25 余明桂, 李文贵, 潘红波. 民营化、产权保护与企业风险承担[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(9): 112-124.
26 张杨, 张钟文, 喻彦杰, 等. 智能制造对企业数据技术创新的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2026, 23(1): 97-106.
29 周文, 韩文龙. 数字财富的创造、分配与共同富裕[J]. 中国社会科学, 2023, (10): 4-23.
30 Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Kerr W R. Innovation network[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(41): 11483-11488.
31 Acs Z J, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch D B, et al. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship[J]. Small Business Economics, 2009, 32(1): 15-30. DOI:10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3
32 Bernal P, Carree M, Lokshin B. Knowledge spillovers, R&D partnerships and innovation performance[J]. Technovation, 2022, 115: 102456. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102456
33 Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J. Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry[J]. Econometrica, 2013, 81(4): 1347-1393. DOI:10.3982/ECTA9466
34 Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C. The productivity J-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies[J]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2021, 13(1): 333-372. DOI:10.1257/mac.20180386
35 Chen Z N, Chan J. Large language model in creative work: The role of collaboration modality and user expertise[J]. Management Science, 2024, 70(12): 9101-9117. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2023.03014
36 Cong L W, Xie D X, Zhang L T. Knowledge accumulation, privacy, and growth in a data economy[J]. Management Science, 2021, 67(10): 6480-6492. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.3986
37 Corvello V, Belas J, Giglio C, et al. The impact of business owners’ individual characteristics on patenting in the context of digital innovation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 155: 113397. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113397
38 Doshi A R, Bell J J, Mirzayev E, et al. Generative artificial intelligence and evaluating strategic decisions[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2025, 46(3): 583-610. DOI:10.1002/smj.3677
39 Goldfarb A, Tucker C. Digital economics[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2019, 57(1): 3-43. DOI:10.1257/jel.20171452
40 Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 577-598. DOI:10.2307/2118401
41 Jones C I, Tonetti C. Nonrivalry and the economics of data[J]. American Economic Review, 2020, 110(9): 2819-2858. DOI:10.1257/aer.20191330
42 Kaplan S N, Strömberg P. Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2003, 70(2): 281-315. DOI:10.1111/1467-937X.00245
43 Rambachan A, Roth J. A more credible approach to parallel trends[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2023, 90(5): 2555-2591. DOI:10.1093/restud/rdad018
44 Wang X C, Li Y, Tian L W, et al. Government digital initiatives and firm digital innovation: Evidence from China[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119: 102545. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102545