中国金融周期与经济周期的交互影响作用分析——基于动态溢出指数方法的实证研究

The Interaction between Financial Cycle and Business Cycle in China: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Dynamic Spillover Index

邓创,徐曼

2018 第 20 卷 第 06 期 页码 63-76

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2018.06.005

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

充分了解金融周期与经济周期之间的交互影响和作用规律,不仅对于新时期深化金融体制改革、增强金融服务实体经济的能力以及避免金融体系与实体经济脱钩具有重要的现实意义,而且也成为科学制定金融监管措施与宏观调控政策、有效维护金融体系与宏观经济双重稳定的突破口。文章在选取利率、汇率、货币供给、社会融资规模和资产价格等多维金融指标构建金融形势指数并测度中国金融周期的基础上,进一步采用基于广义预测误差方差分解的动态溢出指数方法考察了中国金融周期与经济周期的交互影响作用。研究表明:宏观金融与经济波动之间的交互影响受到国际金融市场震荡、经济金融对外开放程度、金融市场发展及金融工具创新等诸多因素的影响;金融波动对经济波动具有十分显著的冲击影响,而经济波动对金融波动的影响作用则一直维持在较低水平,金融体系“脱实向虚”的现象值得警惕。

Currently, it is believed that the economy in China is at a very specific period of " three-phase superposition”, where the coexistence of economic downward pressure and accumulated financial risks brings higher requirements and more challenges to macroeconomic regulation and financial supervision. In this situation, a thorough study of the dynamic interaction between financial cycle and business cycle would contribute to a better understanding of the macroeconomic in the new era, specifically the essence of the financial system. Furthermore, it could be considerably practical to formulate financial supervision and macroeconomic regulation policy scientifically, and to enhance the ability of financial risk control and the support from the financial system to the real economy, hence guarantee the stability of the macro-economy and the financial system.  In this paper, interest rate, exchange rate, money supply, aggregate financing to the real economy and asset prices are selected to build the financial condition index (FCI), which could be helpful to analyze the characteristics of financial cycle fluctuation in China. Furthermore, the dynamic spillover index method, based on generalized prediction error variance decomposition, is adopted to focus on the interaction between financial cycle and business cycle in China. It is revealed in the results that the interaction between macro-finance and economic fluctuation is affected by numerous factors, such as the shock of the international financial market, the openness of the economic and financial market, the development of the financial market, and the innovation of financial instruments. Besides, the impact of financial fluctuation on economic fluctuation is significantly high, while that of economic fluctuation on financial fluctuation remains apparently lower constantly. Hence, the phenomenon called " off real to virtual” in the financial system deserves vigilance.  The research not only obtains the interaction between financial cycle and business cycle from time-varying and directional aspects, but also provides useful decision-making basis enlightenment for financial risk supervision policy and macroeconomic regulation. This paper holds that on the one hand, considering the important influence and the amplification effect of financial cycle fluctuation on macroeconomic fluctuation, we should pay close attention to the domestic and international economic and financial situations, strengthen supervision and anticipation management of financial risks, actively guide the financial sector return to the service standard, and avoid the financial system losing contact with the real economy and become a self-service system. On the other hand, we are supposed to further improve the dual-pillar regulatory framework of monetary policy and macro-prudential policy based on the financial-economic endogenous linkage mechanism, and actively explore the monetary policy regulatory model that takes into account financial stability while improving the local regulatory and supervision of macro-prudential policy for financial imbalances, so as to achieve the dual stability and coordinated development of the macro-economy and the financial system.

参考文献

1 曹永琴,李泽祥. 中国金融经济周期与真实经济周期的动态关联研究[J]. 统计研究,2009,(5) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-4565.2009.05.006
2 岑丽君,黄新克. 中国金融周期与实体经济周期关联性研究[J]. 商业研究,2016,(4) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-148X.2016.04.026
5 陈雨露,马勇,阮卓阳. 金融周期和金融波动如何影响经济增长与金融稳定?[J]. 金融研究,2016,(2) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3109.2016.02.020
9 何德旭,张捷. 经济周期与金融危机:金融加速器理论的现实解释[J]. 财经问题研究,2009,(10) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-176X.2009.10.007
10 李成,王彬,马文涛. 我国金融形势指数的构建及其与宏观经济的关联性研究[J]. 财贸经济,2010,(3) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-913X.2010.03.008
11 李扬. " 金融服务实体经济”辨[J]. 中国经济报告,2017,(6) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3788.2017.06.019
12 刘明志. 货币供应量和利率作为货币政策中介目标的适用性[J]. 金融研究,2006,(1) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1625.2006.01.011
13 陆军,梁静瑜. 中国金融状况指数的构建[J]. 世界经济,2007,(4) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0947.2007.04.017
14 陆岷峰. 金融支持我国实体经济发展的有效性分析[J]. 财经科学,2013,(6) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8306.2013.06.006
16 马勇,张靖岚,陈雨露. 金融周期与货币政策[J]. 金融研究,2017,(3) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3109.2017.03.006
17 马勇,陈雨露. 金融杠杆、杠杆波动与经济增长[J]. 经济研究,2017,(6) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0977.2017.06.016
18 尚玉皇,郑挺国. 中国金融形势指数混频测度及其预警行为研究[J]. 金融研究,2018,(3) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5477.2018.03.012
19 宋玉华,徐前春. 世界经济周期理论的文献述评[J]. 世界经济,2004,(6) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0947.2004.06.011
24 文红星. 经济金融化与经济不稳定性关系研究[J]. 当代经济研究,2016,(7) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-2674.2016.07.010
25 肖强,司颖华. 我国FCI的构建及对宏观经济变量影响的非对称性[J]. 金融研究,2015,(8) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3109.2015.08.004
26 徐国祥,郑雯. 中国金融状况指数的构建及预测能力研究[J]. 统计研究,2013,(8) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-4565.2013.08.015
28 张慕濒,诸葛恒中. 全球化背景下中国经济的金融化:涵义与实证检验[J]. 世界经济与政治论坛,2013,(1) DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-1369.2013.01.001
31 Bernanke B S,Gertler M,Gilchrist S. The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework[J]. Handbook of Macroeconomics,1999,1:1341–1393 DOI:10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10034-X
34 Christiano L, Motto R, Rostagno M. Financial factors in economic fluctuations[R]. ECB Working Paper No.1192, 2010.
35 Claessens S,Kose M A,Terrones M E. How do business and financial cycles interact?[J]. Journal of International Economics,2012,87(1):178–190 DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.11.008
36 Da Silva G F. The impact of financial system development on business cycles volatility:Cross-country evidence[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics,2002,24(2):233–253 DOI:10.1016/S0164-0704(02)00021-6
37 Diebold F X,Yilmaz K. Better to give than to receive:Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers[J]. International Journal of Forecasting,2012,28(1):57–66 DOI:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
39 Fisher I. The debt-deflation theory of great depressions[J]. Econometrica,1933,1(4):337–357 DOI:10.2307/1907327
40 Goodhart C, Hofmann B. Asset prices, financial conditions, and the transmission of monetary policy[A]. Conference on asset prices, exchange rates, and monetary policy[C]. Stanford: Stanford University, 2001.
41 Hamilton J D. A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle[J]. Econometrica,1989,57(2):357–384 DOI:10.2307/1912559
42 Iacoviello M. House prices,borrowing constraints,and monetary policy in the business cycle[J]. The American Economic Review,2005,95(3):739–764 DOI:10.1257/0002828054201477
43 Meh C A,Moran K. The role of bank capital in the propagation of shocks[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2010,34(3):555–576 DOI:10.1016/j.jedc.2009.10.009
44 Menden C,Proaño C R. Dissecting the financial cycle with dynamic factor models[J]. Quantitative Finance,2017,17(12):1965–1994 DOI:10.1080/14697688.2017.1357971
45 Mimir Y. Financial intermediaries,credit shocks and business cycles[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,2016,78(1):42–74 DOI:10.1111/obes.12099