环境信息披露、分析师关注与股价同步性——基于强环境敏感型行业的分析

Environmental Information Disclosure, Analyst Attention and Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence from Strong Environmental Sensitive Industries

危平,曾高峰

2018 第 20 卷 第 02 期 页码 39-58

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2018.02.003

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

文章以上证A股强环境敏感型行业2011–2015年的公司为样本,研究公司环境信息的披露对股价同步性的影响,以及分析师关注所起的调节作用,以揭示环境信息进入股价的渠道。研究表明:(1)上市公司环境信息的披露,无论是显著性、量化性还是时间性的内容,其披露水平与股价同步性正相关;(2)环境信息的披露并不会增加分析师的关注度;(3)关注该公司的分析师会对年报中的环境信息进行解读,并将其反映在股价中,使得环境信息与股价同步性之间的正向关系随着分析师关注度的增加而降低。因此,当噪音是股价同步性的主要驱动因素时,环境信息披露降低了对企业未来发展的不确定性认知,起了“降噪”作用。文章的研究结果为中国股票市场的环境信息效率研究提供了更为直接的证据。

Since 2008, government agencies such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Ministry of Environmental Protection in China have issued a series of policies to encourage and guide Chinese enterprises to carry out environmental information disclosure. With regulation strictness, more and more enterprises start to pay attention to the impacts of their own production and operation on the environment, and disclose environmental information to demonstrate their environmental compliance. Environmental information becomes an important source for corporate idiosyncratic information, not only reflecting enterprise environmental risk & transmitting business signal, but also affecting enterprise financing and valuation estimation. Investors could use the environmental information to assist in investment decisions. As a representative of emerging markets, the volatility of the Chinese stock market is greatly impacted by the noise, and the research conclusions on stock price synchronicity are not consistent. The existing " information efficiency view” holds that corporate idiosyncratic information is the main factor leading to high-degree individual volatility, while a " noise-based view” argues that noise and irrational factors are the main causes of individual fluctuations. Therefore, it is valuable to explore whether environmental information disclosure can help reduce uncertainty on firm’s development and improve stock price synchronicity. This paper uses a sample of Chinese A-shared listed firms in the environmental sensitive indu-stries between 2011 and 2015 to investigate the relationship between environmental information disclosure and stock price synchronicity, and the role of analyst attention in moderating the relationship in the Chinese stock market. The results suggest as follows: firstly, environmental information disclosure of listed firms, no matter it covers significance, quantitative or timing issues, is positively correlated with stock price synchronicity; secondly, corporate environmental information disclosure would not usually draw extra attention from analysts; thirdly, analysts would help to interpret environmental information disclosed by companies, which mitigate the correlations between environmental information disclosure and stock price synchronicity. Therefore, when the noise is the main driving factor for stock price synchronicity, environmental information disclosure would help to reduce the uncertainty about firms’ future development, playing a role in reducing noises. All those findings have contributed new and more direct evidence to the understanding of environmental information efficiency in Chinese stock market.

参考文献

7 李增泉. 所有权安排与股票价格的同步性——来自中国股票市场的证据[A]. 中国会计学会2005年学术年会论文集(下)[C]. 北京: 中国会计学会, 2005.
19 吴红军, 刘啟仁, 郭佐青. 环境信息披露、分析师跟踪与融资约束缓解——基于不对称性信息" 投资—现金流”动态模型[A]. 中国会计学会环境会计专业委员会2014学术年会论文集[C]. 南京: 中国会计学会, 2014.
20 武剑锋. 环境信息披露、融资成本与企业价值增长——来自沪市A股重污染行业的经验证据[D]. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学, 2015.
22 项文彪. 会计信息透明度、分析师盈余预测与股价波动同步性[D]. 南昌: 江西财经大学, 2010.
39 Chan K, Hameed A. Stock price synchronicity and analyst coverage in emerging markets[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 80(1): 115–147. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.010
40 Clarkson P M, Li Y, Richardson G D, et al.Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2008, 33(4–5): 303–327. DOI:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
41 Dasgupta S, Gan J, Gao N. Transparency, price informativeness, and stock return synchronicity: Theory and evidence[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2010, 45(5): 1189–1220. DOI:10.1017/S0022109010000505
42 GulF A, Kim J B, Qiu A A. Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2010, 95(3): 425–442. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.11.005
44 Hutton A P, Marcus A J, Tehranian H. Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 94(1): 67–86. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003
45 Jin L, Myers S C. R2 around the world: New theory and new tests[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 79(2): 257–292. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.11.003
47 Labatt S, White R. Carbon finance: The financial implications of climate change[M]. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2007.
48 Lee D W, Liu M H. Does more information in stock price lead to greater or smaller idiosyncratic return volatility?[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2011, 35(6): 1563–1580. DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.11.002
49 Li D Y, Zhao Y N, Sun Y, et al.Corporate environmental performance, environmental information disclosure, and financial performance: Evidence from China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2017, 23(2): 323–339. DOI:10.1080/10807039.2016.1247256
50 Morck R, Yeung B, Yu W. The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(1–2): 215–260. DOI:10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00071-4
51 Nor N M, Bahari A S, Adnan N A, et al. The effects of environmental disclosure on financial performance in Malaysia[J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2016, 35: 117–126. DOI:10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00016-2
52 Plumlee M, Brown D, Hayes R M, et al.Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 2015, 34(4): 336–361. DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004
53 Qiu Y, Shauka A, Tharyan R. Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance[J]. The British Accounting Review, 2016, 48(1): 102–116. DOI:10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
54 Roll R. R2[J]. Journal of Finance, 1988, 43(3): 541–566.
55 Teoh S H, Yang Y G, Zhang Y L. R-square and market efficiency[Z]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2006.
57 Wang J, Wei S X, Yu W. Information environment, systematic volatility and stock return synchronicity[Z]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2016.
59 Wurgler J. Financial markets and the allocation of capital[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58(1–2): 187–214. DOI:10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00070-2