从微观视角理解经济“脱实向虚”——企业金融化相关研究述评

Understanding the Economic Shifting “from Real to Virtual”from the Micro Perspective: A Literature Review of Corporate Financialization

戴赜,彭俞超,马思超

2018 第 40 卷 第 11 期 页码 31-43

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.11.003

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

企业金融化是经济“脱实向虚”的微观表现形式。本文从微观企业视角,对关于企业金融化的前沿研究进行了梳理和述评,着重辨析了经济金融化与企业金融化的概念差异,划分了企业金融化的不同类型,并分析了企业金融化的不同成因及其对经济发展的不同影响。以分散风险、缓解融资约束为目的的企业金融化能够提升企业的经营效率,促进经济发展;因银行融资歧视形成的企业金融化和因资产价格泡沫形成的企业金融化会削弱金融稳定,阻碍经济发展。本文有助于研究者进一步从微观视角理解“脱实向虚”,有针对性地研究不同类型的企业金融化,并提出差异化的政策建议。

From the perspective of micro enterprises, this paper reviews the frontier research on enterprise finance, analyzes the differences in the concept of economic finance and enterprise finance, divides the different types of enterprise finance, and analyzes the different causes of enterprise finance and its different impacts on economic development. Firstly, according to the definition of enterprise finance, we can come into the two aspects of profits and assets to measure the degree of enterprises engaged in financial investment activities. In general, the higher the financial degree of enterprises is, the higher the proportion of financial assets held in the total assets is, and the higher the proportion of the income obtained through financial investment to the total profit is. By directly using the detailed data of enterprise balance sheet and profit statement, we can measure the degree of corporate finance.  Secondly, through the study of different views, we divide the relevant explanations of the motivation of enterprise finance into three categories:" reservoir”theory, " investment substitution”theory and" entity intermediary”theory." Reservoir”theory holds that the purpose of enterprises to hold financial assets is the liquidity reserve to prevent the break risk of the capital chain caused by the cash flow impact." Investment substitution”theory holds that the purpose of enterprises’ finance is to maximize the profit, so that when the yield of financial investment is higher than the real economic investment, enterprises are more profitable. It will replace the real economic investment with the investment of financial assets." Entity intermediary”theory holds that because of the existence of banks’ financing discrimination, some enterprises are easy to obtain funds from banks, but the production efficiency is low, so the money is obtained from banks and then transferred to other enterprises, that is, non-financial enterprises engage in business similar to financial intermediaries.   In general, although the economy is" debased and virtual”, which is not conducive to economic development and economic stability, corporate finance is not without merit. It is worth emphasizing that different types of corporate finance have different effects on economic development. Enterprise finance, which is caused by the decline of the profit rate of the real economy and the asset price bubble, is not conducive to the stability of the financial system and the healthy development of the economy. Corporate finance is the financing of service entities, which will contribute to economic development.  Finally, we should distinguish between the two kinds of corporate financial behavior with different motives. For enterprises that are motivated by savings, policy support should be given to them; while policy control should be given to enterprises motivated by speculations.

参考文献

1 蔡明荣, 任世驰. 企业金融化: 一项研究综述[J]. 财经科学,2014, (7): 41-51 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8306.2014.07.005
3 胡奕明, 王雪婷, 张瑾. 金融资产配置动机:" 蓄水池”或" 替代”?——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究,2017, (1): 181-194 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-291X.2017.01.080
14 张成思, 张步昙. 中国实业投资率下降之谜: 经济金融化视角[J]. 经济研究,2016, (12): 32-46 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-3151.2016.12.013
15 Akkemik K A, Özen Ş. Macroeconomic and institutional determinants of financialisation of non-financial firms: Case study of turkey[J]. Socio-Economic Review,2014, 12(1): 71-98 DOI:10.1093/ser/mwt006
16 Bleck A, Liu X W. Credit expansion and credit misallocation[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2018, 94: 27-40 DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2017.09.012
17 Chaney T, Sraer D, Thesmar D. The collateral channel: How real estate shocks affect corporate investment[J]. The American Economic Review,2012, 102(6): 2381-2409 DOI:10.1257/aer.102.6.2381
19 Demir F. Financial liberalization, private investment and portfolio choice: Financialization of real sectors in emerging markets[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2009a, 88(2): 314-324 DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.04.002
20 Demir F. Capital market imperfections and financialization of real sectors in emerging markets: Private investment and cash flow relationship revisited[J]. World Development,2009b, 37(5): 953-964 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.003
21 Denis D J, Sibilkov V. Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2010, 23(1): 247-269 DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhp031
24 Duchin R. Cash holdings and corporate diversification[J]. The Journal of Finance,2010, 65(3): 955-992 DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01558.x
25 Duchin R, Gilbert T, Harford J, et al. Precautionary savings with risky assets: When cash is not cash[J]. The Journal of Finance,2017, 72(2): 793-852 DOI:10.1111/jofi.2017.72.issue-2
26 Jiang G H, Lee C M C, Yue H. Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2010, 98(1): 1-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.05.002
27 Kliman A, Williams S D. Why " financialisation” hasn’t depressed US productive investment[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics,2015, 39(1): 67-92 DOI:10.1093/cje/beu033
28 Liu Z, Wang P F, Zha T. Land-price dynamics and macroeconomic fluctuations[J]. Econometrica,2013, 81(3): 1147-1184 DOI:10.3982/ECTA8994
30 Philippon T. Has the US finance industry become less efficient? On the theory and measurement of financial intermediation[J]. American Economic Review,2015, 105(4): 1408-1438 DOI:10.1257/aer.20120578