上海财经大学期刊社
菜单

组织资源协同研究：理论溯源、整合框架与数字化演进

Research on Organizational Resource Synergy: Theoretical Foundations, Integrative Framework, and Digital Evolution

刘晓菊，单标安，陈彪

2026 第 48 卷 第 10 期 页码 129-152

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20260620.301

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

不同资源间的协同有助于放大资源价值，是企业实现持续成长和构建竞争优势的重要基础。现有资源协同研究已形成一系列成果，但仍存在研究视角分散、动态演化关注不足和数字情境阐释不充分等问题。本文通过系统梳理相关文献发现，系统理论、资源基础理论、权变理论和动态能力理论构成了资源协同研究的重要理论基础。在此基础上，本文构建了组织资源协同的形成、变革与价值实现机制框架，指出资源协同经历“协同基础—协同机制—协同效应”的形成过程，并通过企业能力提升和企业行为优化转化为企业价值、企业绩效及其他组织结果，同时受到宏观地区环境、中观行业环境和微观企业情境的共同影响。本文进一步将协同变革纳入资源协同过程框架，强调企业需要根据环境变化、战略调整和绩效反馈推动资源协同持续重构。最后，本文比较了传统资源协同与数字资源协同的差异，揭示了数字情境下连接压力、反馈压力、扩展压力和适应压力如何推动资源协同逻辑发生系统性演化。本研究突破了既有资源协同研究相对分散和静态的分析局限，构建了系统化的资源协同研究框架，揭示了资源协同在数字情境下的动态演化逻辑，从而推动了资源协同研究的系统化、动态化与数字情境化拓展。

Synergy among different resources helps amplify resource value and serves as an important foundation for firms to achieve sustainable growth and build competitive advantages. Although resource synergy research has produced a growing body of findings, it remains limited by fragmented perspectives, insufficient attention to dynamic evolution, and inadequate theorization of the digital context. Through a systematic review of the relevant literature, this paper finds that systems theory, the resource-based view, contingency theory, and dynamic capability theory constitute the important theoretical foundations for resource synergy research. On this basis, this paper constructs a framework of the formation, transformation, and value realization mechanisms of organizational resource synergy. It argues that resource synergy follows a formation process of “synergy foundation–synergy mechanism–synergy effect” and is transformed into corporate value, corporate performance, and other organizational outcomes through the enhancement of firm capabilities and the optimization of firm behaviors. This process is also jointly shaped by macro-level regional environments, meso-level industry environments, and micro-level firm contexts. Furthermore, this paper incorporates synergy transformation into the process framework of resource synergy and emphasizes that firms need to continuously reconfigure resource synergy in response to environmental changes, strategic adjustments, and performance feedback. Finally, by comparing traditional resource synergy and digital resource synergy, this paper reveals how connection pressure, feedback pressure, expansion pressure, and adaptation pressure in the digital context drive the systematic evolution of resource synergy logic. The study addresses the fragmented and static limitations of existing resource synergy research by developing a systematic framework and revealing its dynamic evolutionary logic in the digital context, thereby advancing the systematic, dynamic, and digitally contextualized development of resource synergy research.

关键词： 资源协同,组织资源,数字资源,协同变革,数字化演进,价值创造

参考文献

1 蔡跃洲, 林靖玲, 陈楠. 数据并购视角的数据资源潜在价值与价值实现[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025, (12): 80-99. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2025.12.005
2 郭韬, 黄建行. 数字领导力对企业商业模式创新的影响机制研究——基于动态能力与权变理论视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2026, 43(4): 98-108. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.D32025010414
3 焦豪, 杨季枫, 应瑛. 动态能力研究述评及开展中国情境化研究的建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 191-210, 14. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.05.015
4 李真, 李馨怡. 企业数字化战略更新与动态能力构建——基于徐家汇商城股份的纵向案例研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(7): 101-119. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250103.401
5 刘和东, 陈文潇. 资源互补与行为协同提升合作绩效的黑箱解构——以高新技术企业为对象的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(10): 1847-1857. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2020.10.013
6 刘珍园, 胡海晨. 平台生态嵌入企业数字创新路径研究——基于复杂适应系统理论的组态分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2026, 43(11): 101-111. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.D62025040963
7 马鸿佳, 王亚婧, 苏中锋. 数字化转型背景下中小制造企业如何编排资源利用数字机会——基于资源编排理论的fsQCA研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(4): 90-100, 208. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2024.04.009
8 彭正银, 张晨, 李妍. 中小制造企业如何走向平台化——基于数据资源编排视角的探索性案例研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2025, 28(7): 54-65. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2025.07.006
9 单标安, 刘克难, 徐雨乔, 等. ESG表现对智能制造企业成长的影响——基于一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(7): 70-84. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20241213.101
10 单标安, 刘晓菊, 赵润萱, 等. 组织能力、组织创新与数字化转型如何激发新产品开发绩效?——基于fsQCA的组态效应研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2022, 34(3): 81-93. DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211523
11 苏敬勤, 国玉琳. 新创科技企业如何构建价值场景: 基于“机会—资源一体化”视角[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1288.F.20251014.1400.002, 2026-04-15.
12 苏敬勤, 孙悦, 高昕. 连续数字化转型背景下的数字化能力演化机理——基于资源编排视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(10): 1853-1863. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2022.10.013
13 孙青, 马鸿佳, 王春蕾. 数字平台能力实证研究现状评析与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(10): 98-115. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250613.401
14 孙新波, 张媛, 王永霞, 等. 数字价值创造: 研究框架与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(10): 35-49. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20210322.401
15 孙永磊, 刘心雨, 宋晶, 等. 数字化赋能企业新质生产力的机制研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(4): 135-152. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250723.402
16 汤桐, 马春爱. 数据资源-传统资源匹配对转型升级的影响机制——技术创新的中介效应[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(11): 34-40. DOI:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2024.11.05
17 汪秀婷, 程斌武. 资源整合、协同创新与企业动态能力的耦合机理[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(4): 44-50. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2014.04.006
18 魏江, 王丁, 刘洋. 来源国劣势与合法化战略——新兴经济企业跨国并购的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(3): 101-119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.03.008
19 杨贵彬, 侯雁, 鲁效平, 等. 从“星星之火”到“燎原之势”: 跨界创新情境下工业互联网平台价值共创演化研究[J/OL]. 研究与发展管理, https://doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20241640, 2026-04-15.
20 杨鹏, 尹志锋, 孙宝文. 企业数字技术应用与创新效率提升[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(11): 51-67. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20231129.401
21 易加斌, 张梓仪, 杨小平, 等. 互联网企业组织惯性、数字化能力与商业模式创新[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(5): 29-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2022.05.004
22 弋亚群, 刘益, 李垣. 组织资源的协同机制及其效应分析[J]. 经济管理, 2003, (16): 12-16. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2003.16.002
23 余传鹏, 黎展锋, 林春培, 等. 数字创新网络嵌入对制造企业新产品开发绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(5): 154-173. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.05.010
24 张璐, 王岩, 苏敬勤, 等. 资源基础理论: 发展脉络、知识框架与展望[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(4): 246-256. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2023.04.024
25 张竹, 邢小强, 徐赫辰. 人工智能技术创新与中国企业高质量发展: 能力基础观视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(9): 86-105. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250228.401
26 周全, 程梦婷, 吴绍波, 等. 新能源汽车企业创新生态系统协同构建研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4): 32-41. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.004
27 朱秀梅, 林晓玥, 王天东, 等. 数据价值化: 研究评述与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(12): 3-17. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20230719.401
28 Ackoff R L. Towards a system of systems concepts[J]. Management Science, 1971, 17(11): 661-671. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.17.11.661
29 Adner R, Helfat C E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10): 1011-1025. DOI:10.1002/smj.331
30 Aral S, Weill P. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(5): 763-780. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0306
31 Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas L D W, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(1): 72-95. DOI:10.1002/sej.1266
32 Bai J K, Zha Y, Zhang H X, et al. Relating digital platform synergy and SME agility: The roles of organizational inertia and modularity[J]. Information & Management, 2026, 63(2): 104279. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2025.104279
33 Baker T, Nelson R E. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50(3): 329-366. DOI:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
34 Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120. DOI:10.1177/014920639101700108
35 Barney J, Wright M, Ketchen D J. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991[J]. Journal of Management, 2001, 27(6): 625-641. DOI:10.1177/014920630102700601
36 Bingham C B, Heimeriks K H, Schijven M, et al. Concurrent learning: How firms develop multiple dynamic capabilities in parallel[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(12): 1802-1825. DOI:10.1002/smj.2347
37 Cao G M, Duan Y Q, Cadden T, et al. Systemic capabilities: The source of IT business value[J]. Information Technology & People, 2016, 29(3): 556-579. DOI:10.1108/ITP-05-2014-0090
38 Cao G M, Wiengarten F, Humphreys P. Towards a contingency resource-based view of IT business value[J]. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2011, 24(1): 85-106. DOI:10.1007/s11213-010-9178-0
39 Chen J L. The synergistic effects of IT-enabled resources on organizational capabilities and firm performance[J]. Information & Management, 2012, 49(3-4): 142-150. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2012.01.005
40 Corning P A. Synergy and self-organization in the evolution of complex systems[J]. Systems Research, 1995, 12(2): 89-121. DOI:10.1002/sres.3850120204
41 Corning P A. “The synergism hypothesis”: On the concept of synergy and its role in the evolution of complex systems[J]. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 1998, 21(2): 133-172. DOI:10.1016/S1061-7361(00)80003-X
42 Daft R L, Weick K E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 284-295. DOI:10.2307/258441
43 DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160. DOI:10.2307/2095101
44 Donaldson L. The contingency theory of organizations[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2001.
45 Dong J Q, McCarthy K J, Schoenmakers W W M E. How central is too central? Organizing interorganizational collaboration networks for breakthrough innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2017, 34(4): 526-542. DOI:10.1111/jpim.12384
46 Dong J Q, Yang C H. Business value of big data analytics: A systems-theoretic approach and empirical test[J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(1): 103124. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2018.11.001
47 Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11): 1105-1121. DOI:3.0.CO;2-E" target="_blank">10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/113.0.CO;2-E
48 Ferratt T W, Prasad J, Enns H G. Synergy and its limits in managing information technology professionals[J]. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23(4): 1175-1194. DOI:10.1287/isre.1110.0413
49 Fiedler F E. A contingency model of leadership effectiveness[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1964, 1: 149-190. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_300397
50 Fredericks E. Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingency theory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2005, 34(6): 555-565. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.022
51 George J J, Yan J, Leidner D E. Data philanthropy: Corporate responsibility with strategic value?[J]. Information Systems Management, 2020, 37(3): 186-197. DOI:10.1080/10580530.2020.1696587
52 Glazer R, Weiss A M. Marketing in turbulent environments: Decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1993, 30(4): 509-521. DOI:10.1177/002224379303000409
53 Gruca T S, Nath D, Mehra A. Exploiting synergy for competitive advantage[J]. Long Range Planning, 1997, 30(4): 481-482, 605-611. DOI:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)00039-3
54 Hagedoorn J. Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(3): 670-680. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.21318924
55 Haken H. Synergetics[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977.
56 Haken H. Advanced synergetics[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1983.
57 Hervas-Oliver J L, Albors-Garrigos J. The role of the firm’s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: When distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2009, 9(2): 263-283. DOI:10.1093/jeg/lbn033
58 Horgan J, Mühlau P. Human resource systems and employee performance in Ireland and the Netherlands: A test of the complementarity hypothesis[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2006, 17(3): 414-439. DOI:10.1080/09585190500521409
59 Kast F E, Rosenzweig J E. General systems theory: Applications for organization and management[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1972, 15(4): 447-465. DOI:10.2307/255141
60 Koster F. HR innovation through inter-organizational HR collaboration[J]. Innovation & Management Review, 2024, 21(2): 123-136. DOI:10.1108/INMR-12-2021-0232
61 Lumor T, Pulkkinen M, Chan Y E, et al. Exploring the renewal of IT-enabled resources from a structural perspective[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2023, 53: 555-590. DOI:10.17705/1CAIS.05324
62 Luo X M, Griffith D A, Liu S S, et al. The effects of customer relationships and social capital on firm performance: A Chinese business illustration[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2004, 12(4): 25-45. DOI:10.1509/jimk.12.4.25.53216
63 Melancon J P, Griffith D A, Noble S M, et al. Synergistic effects of operant knowledge resources[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2010, 24(5): 400-411. DOI:10.1108/08876041011060693
64 Mikalef P, Pateli A, van de Wetering R. IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2021, 30(5): 512-540. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808541
65 Mula C, Zybura N, Hipp T. From digitalized start-up to scale-up: Opening the black box of scaling in digitalized firms towards a scaling process framework[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 202: 123275. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123275
66 Nadler D A, Tushman M L. A model for diagnosing organizational behavior[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1980, 9(2): 35-51. DOI:10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-x
67 Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2017, 41(6): 1029-1055. DOI:10.1111/etap.12254
68 Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
69 Nevo S, Wade M R. The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(1): 163-183. DOI:10.2307/20721419
70 Nevo S, Wade M R. Firm-level benefits of IT-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2011, 20(4): 403-418. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2011.08.001
71 Nguyen D K, Broekhuizen T, Dong J Q, et al. Leveraging synergy to drive digital transformation: A systems-theoretic perspective[J]. Information & Management, 2023, 60(7): 103836. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2023.103836
72 Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(9): 697-713. DOI:3.0.CO;2-C" target="_blank">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:93.0.CO;2-C
73 Orton J D, Weick K E. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(2): 203-223. DOI:10.2307/258154
74 Pei L J, Dong C T. Strategic synergy implementation in the evolution of platform ecosystems: A case study of Xiaomi ecosystem[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2025, 28(9): 4628-4649. DOI:10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0441
75 Peng L F, Chen Y C, Robinson S, et al. Exploring IT business value creation in a Taobao village EC ecosystem: A systems theory perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 206: 123534. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123534
76 Penrose E T. The theory of the growth of the firm[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959.
77 Piccoli G, Ives B. Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29(4): 747-776. DOI:10.2307/25148708
78 Pu M, Hao Y, Wang T. Effect of interactive empowerment between digital technology and social network on manufacturing firm growth: Evidence from China[J/OL]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2025.2607471, 2025-12-08.
79 Saraf N, Langdon C S, El Sawy O. IS integration and knowledge sharing in multi-unit firms: The winner’s curse[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2013, 22(6): 592-603. DOI:10.1057/ejis.2012.37
80 Schweikl S, Obermaier R. Lost in translation: IT business value research and resource complementarity-an integrative framework, shortcomings and future research directions[J]. Management Review Quarterly, 2023, 73(4): 1713-1749. DOI:10.1007/s11301-022-00284-7
81 Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 273-292. DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
82 Someh I, Shanks G, Davern M. Reconceptualizing synergy to explain the value of business analytics systems[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2019, 34(4): 371-391. DOI:10.1177/0268396218816210
83 Someh I, Wixom B, Davern M, et al. Configuring relationships between analytics and business domain groups for knowledge integration[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2023, 24(2): 592-618. DOI:10.17705/1jais.00782
84 Song M, Droge C, Hanvanich S, et al. Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 259-276. DOI:10.1002/smj.450
85 Tang R Y, Inoue Y, Tsujimoto M. Synergy effect in platform ecosystem: A quantitative analysis of smart home products[J]. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 13482-13506. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3531993
86 Tanriverdi H. Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(1): 57-77. DOI:10.2307/25148717
87 Teece D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13): 1319-1350. DOI:10.1002/smj.640
88 Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533. DOI:3.0.CO;2-Z" target="_blank">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:73.0.CO;2-Z
89 Teo T S H, Ranganathan C. Leveraging IT resources and capabilities at the housing and development board[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2003, 12(3): 229-249. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2003.09.002
90 Tosi H L, Slocum J W. Contingency theory: Some suggested directions[J]. Journal of Management, 1984, 10(1): 9-26. DOI:10.1177/014920638401000103
91 Venkatesh V, Bala H. Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy[J]. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23(4): 1131-1157. DOI:10.1287/isre.1110.0404
92 Wan W H, Liu L J. Intrapreneurship in the digital era: Driven by big data and human resource management?[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2021, 15(4): 843-875. DOI:10.1108/CMS-07-2020-0282
93 Wang H X, Zheng C D, Liu J Y, et al. Digital technology search and new venture performance in dynamic environments: The mediating role of competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 2022, 34(7): 1-22. DOI:10.4018/joeuc.308816
94 Wang Y, Shi S, Nevo S, et al. The interaction effect of IT assets and IT management on firm performance: A systems perspective[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2015, 35(5): 580-593. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.006
95 Weibl J, Hess T. Turning data into value-exploring the role of synergy in leveraging value among data[J]. Information Systems Management, 2020, 37(3): 227-239. DOI:10.1080/10580530.2020.1696585
96 Weill P, Olson M H. An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1989, 6(1): 59-86. DOI:10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849
97 Weritz P, Braojos J, Matute J, et al. Impact of strategic capabilities on digital transformation success and firm performance: Theory and empirical evidence[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2025, 34(3): 415-435. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2024.2311137
98 Wiengarten F, Humphreys P, Cao G M, et al. Exploring the important role of organizational factors in IT business value: Taking a contingency perspective on the resource-based view[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2013, 15(1): 30-46. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00332.x
99 Winter S G. Understanding dynamic capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10): 991-995. DOI:10.1002/smj.318
100 Xiao R, Wang C K. Founder resources and innovation investment: A configuration perspective[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 262: 125680. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125680
101 Yang C, Bossink B, Peverelli P. High-tech start-up firm survival originating from a combined use of internal resources[J]. Small Business Economics, 2017, 49(4): 799-824. DOI:10.1007/s11187-017-9858-6
102 Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research commentary-the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0322