互联网金融、企业家异质性与小微企业创新

Internet Finance, Entrepreneur Heterogeneity and Small and Micro Enterprises’ Innovation

张玉明,迟冬梅

2018 第 40 卷 第 09 期 页码 42-54

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.09.004

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

互联网金融的“普惠”理念和“草根”特性与小微企业创新融资需求特征相契合,其兴起和发展为小微企业创新活动带来了新的支撑。本文运用针对小微企业的1 857份问卷调研数据和与其所在地相区匹配的202个P2P网络借贷平台数据,实证检验互联网金融发展与小微企业创新表现之间的关系以及企业家异质性对上述关系的影响。研究发现:(1)地区互联网金融发展能够显著促进当地小微企业的创新投入和创新频率;(2)企业家学历水平和社会资本积累越高,互联网金融对小微企业创新的正向影响越显著;(3)企业家任期对互联网金融与小微企业创新关系的影响则呈现倒U形特征,低于6年时具有显著的促进作用,高于这一期限则具有反向调节效应。研究结果不仅为金融发展与经济增长微观机理的解释提供了新的视角,也为我国互联网金融发展和小微企业创新融资提供了经验支持。

This article aims to investigate whether the Internet finance, which is considered as the fresh force of the new financial industry and the gravedigger of the traditional financial industry, can exert a positive influence on the innovation activities of SMEs or not. For this purpose, this article makes attempt to conduct from the following aspects. First, it discusses the relationship between Internet finance and SMEs’ innovation and its action mechanism based on the theory of financial development. Additionally, it reveals the possible influence of entrepreneur heterogeneity on the innovation relationship between Internet finance and SMEs according to the high order theory and the social capital theory. Based on the above theoretical foundation, relevant research hypotheses are proposed. Second, employing the 1,857 questionnaire survey data for SMEs and the data of 202 P2P online lending platforms matched with their location, this article tests the proposed research hypotheses. Finally, the results show that: (1) regional development of Internet finance significantly promote the innovation input and frequency of SMEs; (2) the higher the education level of entrepreneurs is, the more significantly Internet finance exerts a positive influence on SMEs’ innovation; (3) entrepreneur tenure impacts the relationship between Internet finance and SMEs’ innovation in the form of reversed U-shape, showing a positive mediation effect when the tenure is within 6 years and a negative mediation effect when over 6 years. Furthermore, after relaxing the scope of geographical restrictions, it is found that the positive influence of Internet finance on the innovation of SMEs is only reflected in the local area. The possible reason for this phenomenon is that the early stage of the Internet financial review system and the information processing mechanism is still to be improved, which leads to the current situation that Internet financial institutions still have a low efficiency of capital allocation for SMEs with small loans.  The results pave new ways for the explanation about the micro mechanism of finance and economic development, and simultaneously provide practical support for our Internet finance development and SMEs’ innovation financing. Considering that it is difficult through corporate internal financing alone to meet the SMEs’ innovation needs, the government should actively promote the further development of Internet finance, and effectively expand innovative financing channels and financing efficiency of SMEs. It is significantly meaningful for SMEs to obtain new power of innovation. Besides, attention should be paid to the special role of entrepreneurs in innovative financing through Internet financial channels in SMEs. The Internet finance financing mortgage mode, depending on not only the physical assets but also the borrower’s credit, is unique enough to be treated specially. Entrepreneurs’ educational qualifications, experiences and social capital all have led to different credit scores on the Internet credit platform, which will further affect the loan-obtaining success rate of SMEs. Therefore, for SMEs, the attempt to combine entrepreneurial heterogeneity with the Internet credit scoring mechanism is conducive to alleviate the shortage of innovative financing collateral.

参考文献

7 王昱, 成力为, 安贝. 金融发展对企业创新投资的边界影响——基于HECKIT模型的规模与效率门槛研究[J]. 科学学研究,2017, (1): 110-124 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2017.01.014
9 Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J A. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation[J]. The American Economic Review,2001, 91(5): 1369-1401 DOI:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
10 Acquaah M. Managerial social capital, strategic orientation, and organizational performance in an emerging economy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007, 28(12): 1235-1255 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
12 Berger S C, Gleisner F. Emergence of financial intermediaries in electronic markets: The case of online P2P lending[J]. Business Research,2009, 2(1): 39-65 DOI:10.1007/BF03343528
15 Hsu P H, Tian X, Xu Y. Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2014, 112(1): 116-135 DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.002
17 Pope D G, Sydnor J R. What’s in a picture?: Evidence of discrimination from prosper.com[J]. Journal of Human Resources,2011, 46(1): 53-92 DOI:10.1353/jhr.2011.0025