社交媒体中的准社会互动与营销效能研究

Para-social Interaction in Social Media and Its Marketing Effectiveness

袁登华,高丽丹

2020 第 42 卷 第 07 期 页码 21-35

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200407.301

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

社交媒体(如直播、抖音、Vlog等)的快速发展促使学者们重新关注准社会互动理论。区别于传统媒体,社交媒体的通信即时性、方式互动性、内容新颖性、媒体个性化和展示场景化等特点为学者们探究媒体人物与消费者之间的准社会互动提供了新的研究内容和思路。为了更好地解释社交媒体中的准社会互动如何影响消费者的态度和行为,本文通过文献回顾,归纳了社交媒体的概念和特点、准社会互动的内涵和维度,梳理了社交媒体中准社会互动的心理机制及与营销效能的关系。本文为企业营销人员选择、管理媒体人物和为学者深入研究社交媒体的准社会互动提供了有益的思路。

The rapid development of social media(such as live streaming, short videos, Vlogs, etc.)has attracted scholars’ attention to the theory of para-social interaction. Different from traditional media, social media provides new research ideas and content for exploring this kind of interaction between social media personae and consumers due to its characteristics of instant communication, interactivity, novelty of content, media personalization and social media scenario.

Through literature reviews, this paper summarizes the psychological mechanism of para-social interaction in social media. Para-social interaction is distinguished from real social interaction by how it is influenced by social media. Media personae’s characteristics, consumers’ characteristics, and social platform characteristics, all of which are the main influencing factors of consumers’ para-social interaction engagement. According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model(ELM), para-social interaction can stimulate consumers’ cognition of media personae’s self-disclosure and their perceived social presence through the central route and the peripheral route respectively, so as to improve the authenticity and accessibility of media personae perceived by consumers, and ultimately affect the para-social relationship between consumers and media personae. According to Skinner’s theory of reinforcement and previous studies, this paper also demonstrates that para-social interaction and para-social relationship will be continuously strengthened each other in a circular way, where para-social interaction drives the formation of para-social relationships, which will in turn motivate more para-social interaction. With each cycle of reinforcement between PSI and PSR, the para-social relationship between consumers and media personae rises to a higher level, presenting a spiral-upgrading state. Last but not least, when consumers and media personae establish the para-social relationship through para-social interaction, consumers tend to believe in media personas(source credibility), and further believe in the brands recommended by media personae(brand credibility), resulting in more marketing effectiveness(purchase intention and positive word-of-mouth). Meanwhile, the influence of para-social relationships on source credibility may be moderated by the congruence between media personae and brands.

In a word, both cyclic reinforcement mechanism and dual processing routes constitute the psychological mechanism of para-social interaction, which ultimately promotes more marketing effectiveness. Finally, this paper puts forward the marketing strategies to enterprises and the directions for future research.

This paper makes two main contributions: On the one hand, it makes theoretical contributions through exploring the psychological mechanism of para-social interaction; on the other hand, it provides guidance for enterprises to effectively use social media, select and manage media personae, and promote enterprises to generate economic benefits.

参考文献

1 韩璐. 互动与干扰: 媒介融合视域下的弹幕电影探析[J]. 传媒,2015, (19): 69-71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9263.2015.19.026
2 沙振权, 周丹婷. 基于微博的企业家与粉丝类社会互动研究[J]. 工业工程与管理,2013, (5): 112-117, 123. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5429.2013.05.019
4 姚力文, 段峰峰. 网络短视频平台流量变现探析[J]. 新闻前哨,2019, (8): 34-36. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2827.2019.08.018
5 Auter P J, Palmgreen P. Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale[J]. Communication Research Reports,2000, 17(1): 79-89. DOI:10.1080/08824090009388753
7 Behm-Morawitz E. Mirrored selves: The influence of self-presence in a virtual world on health, appearance, and well-being[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2013, 29(1): 119-128. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.023
8 Bhattacherjee A, Sanford C. Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model[J]. MIS Quarterly,2006, 30(4): 805-825. DOI:10.2307/25148755
9 Boerman S C, Willemsen L M, Van Der Aa E P. “This post is sponsored”: Effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing,2017, 38: 82-92. DOI:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002
10 Brown W J, Basil M D. Parasocial interaction and identification: Social change processes for effective health interventions[J]. Health Communication,2010, 25(6-7): 601-602. DOI:10.1080/10410236.2010.496830
12 Chung S, Cho H. Parasocial relationship via reality TV and social media: Its implications for celebrity endorsement[A]. Proceedings of the ACM international conference on interactive experiences for TV and online video[C]. New York: ACM, 2014.
14 Cohen E L, Tyler W J. Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction[J]. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,2016, 19(5): 342-346. DOI:10.1089/cyber.2015.0657
15 Cohen J. Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: The role of attachment styles and relationship intensity[J]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,2004, 21(2): 187-202. DOI:10.1177/0265407504041374
16 Colliander J, Dahlén M. Following the fashionable friend: The power of social media: Weighing publicity effectiveness of blogs versus online magazines[J]. Journal of Advertising Research,2011, 51(1): 313-320. DOI:10.2501/JAR-51-1-313-320
19 Dibble J L, Hartmann T, Rosaen S F. Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures[J]. Human Communication Research,2016, 42(1): 21-44. DOI:10.1111/hcre.12063
20 Dibble J L, Rosaen S F. Parasocial interaction as more than friendship: Evidence for parasocial interactions with disliked media figures[J]. Journal of Media Psychology,2011, 23(3): 122-132. DOI:10.1027/1864-1105/a000044
21 Djafarova E, Rushworth C. Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2017, 68: 1-7. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
22 Erdem T, Swait J. Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,2004, 31(1): 191-198. DOI:10.1086/383434
23 Gilpin D R, Palazzolo E T, Brody N. Socially mediated authenticity[J]. Journal of Communication Management,2010, 14(3): 258-278. DOI:10.1108/13632541011064526
25 Hartmann T, Goldhoorn C. Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction[J]. Journal of Communication,2011, 61(6): 1104-1121. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x
26 Horton D, Wohl R R. Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance[J]. Psychiatry,1956, 19(3): 215-229. DOI:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
27 Hu M. The influence of a scandal on parasocial relationship, parasocial interaction, and parasocial breakup[J]. Psychology of Popular Media Culture,2016, 5(3): 217-231. DOI:10.1037/ppm0000068
28 Hwang K, Zhang Q. Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2018, 87: 155-173. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029
30 John S P, De’Villiers R. Elaboration of marketing communication through visual media: An empirical analysis[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2020, 54: 102052. DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102052
31 Kaplan A M, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media[J]. Business Horizons,2010, 53(1): 59-68. DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
32 Kim M J, Bonn M, Lee C K. Seniors’ dual route of persuasive communications in mobile social media and the moderating role of discretionary time[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,2017, 22(8): 799-818. DOI:10.1080/10941665.2017.1331925
33 Klimmt C, Hartmann T, Schramm H. Parasocial interactions and relationships[A]. Bryant J, Vorderer P. Psychology of entertainment[C]. Washington: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2006.
34 Knoll J, Schramm H, Schallhorn C, et al. Good guy vs. bad guy: The influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects[J]. International Journal of Advertising,2015, 34(5): 720-743. DOI:10.1080/02650487.2015.1009350
35 Labrecque L I. Fostering consumer-brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing,2014, 28(2): 134-148. DOI:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
36 Lee J E, Watkins B. YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions[J]. Journal of Business Research,2016, 69(12): 5753-5760. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171
37 Lee K M, Nass C. Social-psychological origins of feelings of presence: Creating social presence with machine-generated voices[J]. Media Psychology,2005, 7(1): 31-45. DOI:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0701_2
39 Liu M T, Liu Y D, Zhang L L. Vlog and brand evaluations: The influence of parasocial interaction[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics,2019, 31(2): 419-436. DOI:10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0021
41 Lu L C, Chang W P, Chang H H. Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2014, 34: 258-266. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.007
42 Men L R, Tsai W H S. Public engagement with CEOs on social media: Motivations and relational outcomes[J]. Public Relations Review,2016, 42(5): 932-942. DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.08.001
43 Ngai E W T, Tao S S C, Moon K K L. Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2015, 35(1): 33-44. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.004
44 Pan S, Hanusch F. Tourism TV commercials: A delicate balance between aural and visual information load[J]. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing,2011, 28(5): 465-480.
45 Perse E M, Rubin A M. Audience activity and satisfaction with favorite television soap opera[J]. Journalism Quarterly,1988, 65(2): 368-375. DOI:10.1177/107769908806500216
46 Petty R E, Cacioppo J T. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1984, 46(1): 69-81. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
49 Rubin A M, Perse E M, Powell R A. Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing[J]. Human Communication Research,1985, 12(2): 155-180. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
51 Schrader C, Bastiaens T J. The influence of virtual presence: Effects on experienced cognitive load and learning outcomes in educational computer games[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2012, 28(2): 648-658. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.011
53 Schramm H, Wirth W. Testing a universal tool for measuring parasocial interactions across different situations and media[J]. Journal of Media Psychology,2010, 22(1): 26-36. DOI:10.1027/1864-1105/a000004
55 Spry A, Pappu R, Cornwell T B. Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity[J]. European Journal of Marketing,2011, 45(6): 882-909. DOI:10.1108/03090561111119958
56 Xiao M, Wang R, Chan-Olmsted S. Factors affecting YouTube influencer marketing credibility: A heuristic-systematic model[J]. Journal of Media Business Studies,2018, 15(3): 188-213. DOI:10.1080/16522354.2018.1501146
57 Yuksel M, Labrecque L I. “Digital buddies”: Parasocial interactions in social media[J]. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing,2016, 10(4): 305-320. DOI:10.1108/JRIM-03-2016-0023