外出务工经历、社会资本与返乡农民工创业——来自CHIPS数据的证据

Migrant Working Experience, Social Capital and Entrepreneurship of Migrant Workers Returning Home:Evidence from CHIPS Data

徐超,吴玲萍,孙文平

2017 第 43 卷 第 12 期 页码 30-44

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2017.12.003

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

在经济新常态背景下,返乡农民工的创业选择日益成为大家关注的焦点。文章借助CHIPS微观调查数据,系统评估了外出务工经历对返乡农民工自主创业的影响。研究发现,外出务工经历显著提高了农民自主创业的概率。在处理了遗漏变量和外溢效应等内生性问题后,结果依旧稳健。在基本结论的基础上,文章还对社会资本的中介作用进行了实证检验。结果发现:与留守本地农民相比,有过外出务工经历的农民的社会关系网络更加广泛,且更容易获取创业资金、客户资源和经营许可。此外,文章进一步考察了外出务工经历对不同类型创业项目的异质性影响。具体看,外出务工经历对初始投资规模较小和以发展为目的的创业项目影响显著,对初始投资规模较大和以生存为目的的创业项目无明显作用。文章研究不仅有助于解释不同类型农民在创业决策上存在的巨大差异,还为当下政府支持返乡农民工创业提供了可借鉴的理论依据。

With the continuous development of historic node of building a moderately prosperous society in all respects, the employment of farmers has been closely watched. In the new economic background, a large number of migrant workers returning home further exacerbate the seriousness of farmer employment problem. How to realize the reemployment of these farmers and give full play to their comparative advantages in order to promote local economic development has become an urgent problem to be solved. Among many employment options, self-employment is seen as a cure for easing employment pressure. Farmer entrepreneurship can not only realize their own re-employment to increase household income and consumption, but also provide a lot of jobs to widely absorb rural idle labor force and improve the overall rural employment level. On the basis of existing research, this paper systematically assesses the impact of migrant working experience on entrepreneurship of migrant workers returning home based on CHIPS2007 microscopic investigation data, in order to provide the theoretical basis for the governments to encourage and support the migrant workers to build business. The preliminary regression results show that the migrant working experience can significantly increase the probability of farmers to start their self-employed business. In order to enhance the credibility of the conclusions, we use the instrumental variable method to eliminate the estimation errors caused by missing variables, and separately use the sample of heads of households to eliminate the interference from family spillover effects. Then the basic conclusion has not changed. The existing literature focuses on discussing the mediating effect of human capital and savings on peasant entrepreneurship, while ignoring the important channel of social capital, which has been analyzed complementally in this paper. The empirical results show that the farmers who have migrant working experience have a wider network of social relationships and are more likely to obtain the venture funds, customer resources and business permit for their entrepreneurship. In addition, we divide the entrepreneurship programs according to the standards of initial investment size and entrepreneurial purpose to further investigate the impact of migrant working experience on different types of start-ups. Specifically, migrant working experience has a significant impact on those small-scale investment and development-oriented projects, but no significant impact on those large-scale investment and survival-oriented projects. This study not only helps to explain the huge differences in different types of peasants on entrepreneurial decision-making, but also provides a theoretical basis for the governments to support migrant workers' returning home to build their own business.

参考文献

4 胡金焱, 张博.社会网络、民间融资与家庭创业[J].金融研究, 2014, (10):138-148.
19 Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J, and et al. Institutional causes, macroeeconomic symptoms:Volatility, crises and growth[J].Journal of Monetary Economics, 2003, 50(1):49-123. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00208-8
22 Bian Y. Bring strong ties back in:Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China[J].American Sociological Review, 1997, 62(3):366-385. DOI:10.2307/2657311
24 Co CY, Gang I N, Yun M S. Returns to returning[J].Journal of Population Economics, 2000, 13(1):57-79. DOI:10.1007/s001480050123
25 Coulon A, Piracha M. Self-selection and the performance of return migrants:The source country perspective[J].Journal of Population Economics, 2005, 18(4):779-807. DOI:10.1007/s00148-005-0004-4
27 Démurge S, Xu H. Return migration and entrepreneurship in rural China:The case of Wuwei county[J]. World Development, 2011, 39(10):1847-1861. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.027
30 Ma Z.Social-capital mobilization and income returns to entrepreneurship:The case of return migration in rural China[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2002, 34(10):1763-1784. DOI:10.1068/a34193
31 Marchetta F. Return migration and the survival of entrepreneurial activities in Egypt[J].World Development, 2012, 40(10):1999-2013. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.009
32 Mccormick B, Wahba J. Overseas work experience, savings and entrepreneurship amongst return migrants to LDCs[J].Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2001, 48(2):164-178. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.267991
35 Piracha M, Vadean F. Return migration and occupational choice:Evidence from Albania[J].World Development, 2010, 38(8):1141-1155. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.015
36 Westlund H, Bolton R. Local social capital and entrepreneurship, small business economics[J].2003, 21(2):77-113.
37 Yueh L.Self-employment in urban China:Networking in a transition economy[J].China Economic Review, 2009, 20(3):471-484. DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2009.01.002