注册制改革与企业环境信息披露*

The Registration System Reform and Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure: Evidence from Peer Spillover Effects

钟腾,朱光顺,福渔

2026 第 52 卷 第 09 期 页码 34-48

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20260619.301

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

企业环境信息披露对推动生态环境治理体系和治理能力现代化具有重要意义。文章研究了以信息披露为核心的注册制改革是否会因为注册上市公司信息披露的改善而产生溢出效应,进而带动同行业其他上市公司提升环境信息披露水平。文章以2013—2024年沪深A股上市公司为样本,通过构建交错双重差分模型分析发现:注册制改革显著提升了同行业上市公司的环境信息披露水平,并更大程度地提升了上市公司实质性而非策略性环境信息的披露。机制分析发现,注册制改革能通过增加媒体报道、提高投资者实地调研的外部压力、促使企业自身增加绿色投资和改善绿色绩效的内部治理机制发挥作用。调节效应表明,该溢出效应在行业竞争压力更强、政府环境治理压力更大以及企业聘任环保背景高管的情境下更为显著。经济后果分析发现,注册制改革引致的环境信息披露水平提升促进了企业绿色创新并抑制了绿色代理冲突。文章的研究在一定程度上填补了注册制改革对企业环境信息披露溢出效应的研究空白,同时研究结论为通过资本市场深化改革推动实体经济绿色转型提供了经验证据和政策启示。

Corporate environmental information disclosure reflects the outcomes of corporate environmental governance, and is also an important basis for investors to assess firms’ environmental performance. As a fundamental institutional arrangement for deepening the market-oriented reform and improving capital market functions, the registration system reform (RSR) is centered on information disclosure. As an important component of corporate information disclosure, environment-related matters have gradually been incorporated into the whole process of IPO due diligence, prospectus disclosure, and exchange review in the context of the RSR. Against this background, a question worth discussing is whether the disclosure constraints strengthened by the RSR will affect peer firms’ environmental information disclosure behavior through industry spillover effects, thereby generating broader environmental governance effects.

Using data from China’s A-share listed companies from 2013 to 2024, this paper takes the first appearance of a registration-based listed firm in an industry as the RSR shock, constructs a staggered DID model, and examines the impact of the RSR on peer firms’ environmental information disclosure and its underlying mechanisms from the perspective of information spillover. The results show that the RSR significantly improves the environmental information disclosure level of listed companies in the same industry, and increases substantive rather than strategic environmental information disclosure of listed companies to a greater extent. Mechanism testing shows that the RSR works through the external pressures arising from increased negative media cove-rage and investor on-site visits, and the internal governance channels involving increased green investment and improved green performance. Moderating effects show that the spillover effects are more significant when industry competition pressure is stronger, government environmental governance pressure is greater, and firms employ executives with environmental backgrounds. The analysis of economic consequences shows that the improvement in environmental information disclosure induced by the RSR promotes corporate green innovation and mitigates green agency conflicts.

This paper partially fills the gap in the literature on the spillover effects of the RSR on corporate environmental information disclosure. Meanwhile, the findings provide empirical evidence and policy implications for promoting the green transformation of the real economy through deepening the capital market reform.

参考文献

1 气候信息披露能够提高企业信贷可得性吗. 会计研究,2025,(7):124-137. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2025.07.009.
2 管理者环境认知能够提升企业绩效吗——前瞻型环境战略的中介作用与商业环境不确定性的调节作用. 南开管理评论,2016,(6):49-57. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2016.06.006.
3 审核问询、信息披露更新与IPO市场表现——科创板企业招股说明书的文本分析. 经济管理,2021,(4):155-172. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2021.04.010.
4 环保费改税对企业绿色信息披露的影响研究. 证券市场导报,2021,(8):2-14.
6 环境信息披露质量、内控“水平”与企业价值——来自重污染行业上市公司的经验证据. 会计研究,2021,(7):69-84. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2021.07.006.
7 绿色制造与企业环境信息披露——基于中国绿色工厂创建的政策实验. 经济研究,2024,(2):116-134.
8 IPO首日限价政策能否抑制投资者“炒新”?. 管理世界,2019,(1):192-210. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2019.01.013.
9 注册制的溢出效应: 基于股价同步性的研究. 管理世界,2022,(12):177-198. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.12.013.
10 公司环保信息披露与融资约束. 世界经济,2017,(5):124-147.
11 科创板IPO审核问询回复函与首发抑价. 管理世界,2022,(4):185-203. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.04.014.
12 同伴企业环境信息披露质量与家族企业绿色创新——基于二元合法性视角的检验. 南开管理评论,2025,(12):130-141. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2025.12.013.
13 企业数字技术应用对绿色创新质量的影响研究. 管理学报,2024,(2):232-239. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2024.02.008.
14 年报语调与内部人交易: “表里如一”还是“口是心非”?. 管理世界,2018,(9):143-160. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.09.012.
15 银行金融科技赋能绿色治理: 来自环境信息质量提升的证据. 世界经济,2025,(12):179-208.
16 机构投资者驱动企业绿色治理: 监督效应与内在机理. 管理世界,2024,(4):197-214. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.04.011.
17 机构投资者绿色关注与企业“漂绿”行为: 效应、诱因与治理. 财经研究,2024,(11):95-110. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20240819.201.
18 招股说明书可读性影响IPO抑价了吗?. 外国经济与管理,2020,(3):104-117,135. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20190926.002.
19 Peer effects in risk aversion and trust. Review of Financial Studies,2014,27(11):3213-3240. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhu042.
20 Registration system reform, information environment, and market manipulation. Journal of Corporate Finance,2025,93:102797. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102797.
21 Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society,2008,33(4-5):303-327. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.873630.
22 The corporate governance role of the media: Evidence from Russia. The Journal of Finance,2008,63(3):1093-1135. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01353.x.
23 Effects of mandatory carbon reporting on greenwashing. The Accounting Review,2026,101(4):263-293. DOI:10.2308/TAR-2023-0247.
24 Product market competition in a world of cross-ownership: Evidence from institutional blockholdings. The Review of Financial Studies,2017,30(8):2674-2718. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhx028.
25 Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. Journal of Political Economy,2016,124(5):1423-1465. DOI:10.1086/688176.
26 Soft shareholder activism. The Review of Financial Studies,2019,32(7):2775-2808. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhy119.
27 The dark side of audit market competition. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2023,75(1):101520. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101520.
28 Peer effects in R&D investment policy: Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics,2021,26(3):4516-4533. DOI:10.1002/ijfe.2028.
29 Public disclosure of private meetings: Does observing peers’ information acquisition affect analysts’ attention allocation?. Journal of Accounting Research,2025,63(4):1629-1677. DOI:10.1111/1475-679X.12603.
30 When does the peer information environment matter?. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2017,64(2-3):183-214. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.03.005.
31 Why does an IPO affect rival firms?. The Review of Financial Studies,2020,33(7):3205-3249. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhz081.
32 Chinese annual report readability: Measurement and test. China Journal of Accounting Studies,2019,7(3):407-437. DOI:10.1080/21697213.2019.1701259.
33 Can environmental monitoring power transition curb corporate greenwashing behavior?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2023,212:199-218. DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.034.

数据公开

标题文件大小下载
附录 125.5 KB
数据及程序代码 17.5 MB