供应链信息隐藏如何影响企业创新:基于专有化成本的解释

How does Supply Chain Information Concealment Affect Corporate Innovation? An Explanation Based on Proprietary Costs

吉文军,叶德珠,詹林帆

2026 第 52 卷 第 09 期 页码 154-168

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20260720.301

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

作为资本市场健康发展的基石,高质量信息披露的重要性已成共识,然而近些年来我国上市公司供应链信息透明度呈现下降态势,这一现象的原因和经济影响值得关注。文章基于专有化成本理论,探究上市公司隐藏供应链交易方的名称信息如何影响企业创新。研究发现,供应链信息隐藏对于企业实质性创新具有显著正向影响,而对于策略性创新无显著影响。机制分析发现,这种供应链信息的隐藏会通过加强技术信息保护、提高市场议价能力和降低声誉风险而促进企业实质性创新。异质性分析发现,供应链信息隐藏对企业实质性创新的促进效应在债务融资成本较低、外部监督水平较高、技术背景高管比例较高,以及交易金额占比较低、研发信息披露程度较低、知识产权司法保护较弱的样本中更为显著。进一步分析发现,供应商信息隐藏对于关键核心技术创新的促进作用更显著,客户信息隐藏对非关键核心技术创新的促进作用更显著。文章的研究揭示了供应链信息隐藏的创新经济效果,也为监管部门实施差异化的供应链信息披露准则提供了启示。

As a cornerstone for the healthy development of the capital market, the significance of high-quality information disclosure has become a consensus. However, in recent years, the transparency of supply chain information of listed companies in China has shown a downward trend, and the economic impact resul-ting from this phenomenon deserves attention. Under the policy context of strengthening the quality of infor-mation disclosure and supporting the protection of business secrets simultaneously, this study explores the impact of supply chain information concealment on corporate innovation based on the theory of proprietary costs.

The results show that supply chain information concealment has a significant positive impact on the substantive innovation, but has no significant impact on strategic innovation. The mechanism analysis reveals that supply chain information concealment promotes substantive innovation by strengthening the protection of technical information, enhancing market bargaining power, and reducing negative reputation risks. The heterogeneity analysis finds that the promoting effect of supply chain information concealment on the substantive innovation is more significant in samples with lower debt financing costs, stronger external supervision, a higher proportion of executives with technical backgrounds, smaller transaction shares, lower R&D information disclosure levels, and weaker intellectual property judicial protection. Further analysis reveals that the promoting effect of supplier information concealment on key core technological innovation is more obvious, while customer information concealment has a more significant impact on non-core technological innovation.

The contributions are as follows: First, it shows that supply chain information concealment is beneficial to substantive innovation, providing a new perspective for understanding the economic consequences of supply chain information concealment. Second, it reveals that supply chain information disclosure can also signifi-cantly affect corporate innovation, in addition to financial information and R&D information, supplementing the research content of information disclosure and corporate innovation. Third, it suggests that listed compa-nies need to make a trade-off between the benefits and the proprietary costs of information disclosure, provi-ding theoretical explanations and empirical evidence for government to implement differentiated regulatory standards of supply chain information disclosure.

参考文献

1 大客户提升抑或降低了公司供应链透明度?——基于供应商名称信息披露的经验证据. 会计研究,2023,(3):34-49. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2023.03.003.
2 知识产权保护的绿色技术创新效应. 经济学动态,2023,(10):71-89.
3 供应链透明度与公司避税. 中国工业经济,2022,(11):155-173. DOI:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.11.008.
4 供应链关系变动、融资约束与企业创新. 经济管理,2022,(10):56-74. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2022.10.004.
5 企业供应链风险与纵向并购决策之谜——来自文本挖掘的经验证据. 数量经济技术经济研究,2025,(1):116-135. DOI:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20241125.002.
6 年报可读性与企业创新. 经济管理,2020,(10):156-173. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2020.10.009.
7 供应链客户信息对公司信息环境的影响研究——基于股价同步性的分析. 金融研究,2016,(12):191-206.
8 债务融资成本与民营信贷歧视. 金融研究,2009,(12):137-150.
9 知识产权司法保护与企业创新——兼论中国企业创新结构的变迁. 经济研究,2021,(5):144-161.
10 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响. 经济研究,2016,(4):60-73.
11 分行业信息披露与企业创新——来自行业信息披露指引的准自然实验. 财贸经济,2024,(4):105-122. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-8102.2024.04.007.
12 供应链透明度与企业短贷长投——基于供应商和客户信息披露视角. 审计与经济研究,2024,(6):73-84. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4833.2024.06.008.
13 上市公司披露客户名称真的有益吗——基于投资者感知的视角. 会计研究,2022,(1):29-43. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2022.01.004.
14 年报预约披露延迟与企业创新. 会计研究,2020,(8):159-177. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2020.08.012.
15 下游产业政策与客户信息披露: 基于产业政策溢出效应. 会计研究,2024,(4):165-177. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2024.04.012.
16 自愿披露客户信息影响了债券违约风险吗?. 南京审计大学学报,2024,(1):67-75. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-8750.2024.01.007.
17 专有化成本与公司自愿性信息披露——基于客户信息披露的分析. 财经研究,2014,(12):27-38. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2014.12.008.
18 高管信息技术背景与企业数字化转型. 经济管理,2022,(12):138-157. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2022.12.008.
19 媒体压力与企业创新. 经济研究,2017,(8):125-139.
20 创新对企业MD&A叙述性信息披露策略的影响. 南开管理评论,2024,(3):150-162.
21 供应链透明度与审计师风险决策——基于审计费用的经验证据. 会计研究,2025,(1):178-192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2025.01.014.
22 供应商ESG评级分歧何以影响企业运营韧性. 中国工业经济,2024,(11):174-192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2024.11.010.
23 国家战略科技力量与企业关键核心技术突破——来自国家和省级重点实验室的证据. 中国工业经济,2024,(9):62-80. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2024.09.004.
24 知识产权保护与企业创新信息困境. 中国工业经济,2022,(6):136-154. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2022.06.008.
25 Gender-biased technological change: Milking machines and the exodus of women from farming. American Economic Review,2026,116(1):246-286. DOI:10.1257/aer.20240167.
26 Reporting regulation and corporate innovation. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2025,80(1):101769. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101769.
27 Access to financial disclosure and knowledge spillover. The Accounting Review,2024,99(5):147-170. DOI:10.2308/TAR-2023-0406.
28 Financial disclosure policy in an entry game. Journal of Accounting and Economics,1990,12(1-3):219-243. DOI:10.1016/0165-4101(90)90048-9.
29 Markups and firm-level export status. American Economic Review,2012,102(6):2437-2471. DOI:10.1257/aer.102.6.2437.
30 The effect of media-linked directors on financing and external governance. Journal of Financial Economics,2022,145(2):103-131. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.07.017.
31 Proprietary costs and the disclosure of information about customers. Journal of Accounting Research,2012,50(3):685-727. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00441.x.
32 Financial reporting frequency and corporate innovation. The Journal of Law and Economics,2020,63(3):501-530. DOI:10.1086/708706.
33 Customer identity concealing and insider selling profitability: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance,2024,85:102566. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102566.
34 The paradox of innovation nondisclosure: Evidence from licensing contracts. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2024,16(4):220-256. DOI:10.1257/app.20230046.
35 The innovation consequences of mandatory patent disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2021,71(2-3):101381. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101381.
36 Trade secrets law and corporate disclosure: Causal evidence on the proprietary cost hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research,2018,56(1):265-308. DOI:10.1111/1475-679X.12187.
37 Hide away from implication: Potential environmental reputation spillover and strategic concealment of supply chain partners’ identities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2024,44(9):1595-1620. DOI:10.1108/IJOPM-08-2023-0649.
38 Identification with imperfect instruments. Review of Economics and Statistics,2012,94(3):659-671. DOI:10.1162/REST_a_00171.
39 Customer-base concentration: Implications for firm performance and capital markets. The Accounting Review,2012,87(2):363-392. DOI:10.2308/accr-10198.
41 Supply chain transparency and corporate financial fraud. Finance Research Letters,2025,77:107070. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2025.107070.
42 Supply chain washing: Strategic disclosure of corporate suppliers. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2026,82(1):101883. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2026.101883.
43 Disclosing labor demand: Evidence from online job postings. The Accounting Review,2025,100(5):345-374. DOI:10.2308/TAR-2023-0062.
44 Trade secrets leakage risk and firm innovation: Evidence from third-party disclosure of Chinese listed firms’ online sales data. Accounting & Finance,2025,65(1):59-80. DOI:10.1111/acfi.13317.
45 Who pays buyers for not disclosing supplier lists? Unlocking the relationship between supply chain transparency and trade credit. Journal of Business Research,2023,155:113404. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113404.
46 News-based ESG sentiment and stock price crash risk. International Review of Financial Analysis,2023,88:102646. DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102646.
47 Transparency and firm innovation. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2018,66(1):67-93. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.02.001.

数据公开

标题文件大小下载
数据及程序代码 7.5 MB