耐心资本如何“以点带面”——基于政府引导基金的研究

The “Point-to-Area” Effect of Patient Capital: A Study Based on Government Guidance Funds

杨靖,田宗涛,陈志斌

2026 第 52 卷 第 07 期 页码 79-93

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20250321.101

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

语音预告

摘要

政府引导基金是壮大耐心资本的关键力量。文章以2015—2023年A股上市公司为研究样本,考察了政府引导基金投资对股票市场上机构投资者持股稳定性的影响。研究发现,政府引导基金投资显著提高了机构投资者对被投资企业的持股稳定性,发挥了“以点带面”的引导作用,壮大了耐心资本。机制检验表明,政府引导基金通过鉴证信号效应和质量改善效应提高了被投资企业的机构投资者关注度和公司质量,从而促进了机构持股稳定性提升。异质性分析表明,政府引导基金对机构持股稳定性的促进作用在规模较小的企业、战略性新兴产业的企业以及金融市场化水平较低地区的企业中更加明显。经济后果研究显示,在政府引导基金的支持下,机构持股稳定性的提高能够显著降低企业的股价崩盘风险和融资成本。文章为我国壮大耐心资本、稳定资本市场和推动经济高质量发展提供了新的经验证据。

The stable development of capital markets is a critical component of national financial security, and cultivating patient capital represents an essential pathway. As a prominent form of patient capital, government guidance funds (GGFs) serve as a pivotal force in expanding patient capital. Existing literature predominantly focuses on the guiding role of GGFs in primary markets, leaving their potential impact on the shareholding stability of institutional investors in secondary markets largely unexplored.

Using data from China’s A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2023, this paper examines the impact of GGFs’ investment on the shareholding stability of institutional investors in the stock market. The study finds that GGFs significantly enhance the shareholding stability of institutional investors in invested firms, demonstrating a “point-to-area” effect and further strengthening patient capital. Mechanism testing shows that GGFs enhance the institutional investor attention and corporate quality of invested firms by leveraging certification signaling and quality improvement effects, thereby promoting institutional shareholding stability. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the positive effect is more pronounced in smaller-scale firms, in strategic emerging industries, and in firms with a lower level of regional financial marketization. Economic consequence analysis indicates that the increased stability of institutional shareholding under the support of GGFs can significantly reduce corporate stock price crashes and financing costs.

The marginal contributions of this paper are as follows: First, it enriches research on the economic consequences of patient capital development. Given the scarcity of current research on patient capital, this paper analyzes the guiding role of GGFs in expanding patient capital, contributing to relevant research. Second, it expands research on the influencing factors of institutional investors. From the perspective of patient capital, this paper explores the “point-to-area” effect of GGFs on institutional shareholding stability. This broadens the research scope of GGFs and offers a new perspective on understanding the shareholding behavior of institutional investors, guiding long-term value investment. Third, it offers timely policy implications, suggesting coordinated actions for governments (enhancing GGF leadership), institutions (prioritizing long-term value), and firms (improving patient capital appeal) to strengthen market stability amid economic uncertainties.

参考文献

1 安梦天, 李雪娇. 有为政府、金融引导与碳减排——来自绿色政府引导基金的经验证据[J]. 财经科学, 2024, (5): 1−17. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8306.2024.05.001
3 薄仙慧, 吴联生. 国有控股与机构投资者的治理效应: 盈余管理视角[J]. 经济研究, 2009, (2): 81−91.
7 曹丰, 鲁冰, 李争光, 等. 机构投资者降低了股价崩盘风险吗?[J]. 会计研究, 2015, (11): 55−61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2015.11.008
8 常丽, 武小楠. 政府投资基金对初创期企业创新绩效的影响研究——基于政府配置资源市场化改革视角[J]. 会计研究, 2022, (8): 135−148. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2022.08.010
9 丛菲菲, 李曜, 谷文臣. 国有创投资本对民营资本的引导效应研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2019, (10): 95−110. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-8102.2019.10.007
11 杜兴强, 洪婧, 陶和锌, 等. 数字金融总是有益于会计信息透明度吗[J]. 会计研究, 2024, (10): 18−32. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2024.10.002
12 方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新——来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, (2): 91−106.
13 方先明, 那晋领. 创业板上市公司绿色创新溢酬研究[J]. 经济研究, 2020, (10): 106−123.
14 宫义飞, 张可欣, 徐荣华, 等. 政府引导基金发挥了“融资造血”功能吗[J]. 会计研究, 2021, (4): 89−102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2021.04.008
18 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (5): 100−120. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2022.05.007
21 孔东民, 孔高文, 刘莎莎. 机构投资者、流动性与信息效率[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, (3): 1−15.
25 李维安, 李滨. 机构投资者介入公司治理效果的实证研究——基于CCGINK的经验研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2008, (1): 4−14. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2008.01.002
28 李增福, 冯柳华. 企业ESG表现与商业信用获取[J]. 财经研究, 2022, (12): 151−165.
29 李争光, 赵西卜, 曹丰, 等. 机构投资者异质性与会计稳健性——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2015, (3): 111−121. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2015.03.012
37 史永, 李思昊. 关联交易、机构投资者异质性与股价崩盘风险研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2018, (4): 123−131. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2018.04.012
39 王斌, 李建平. 双重道德风险下政府引导基金激励监督机制设计[J]. 运筹与管理, 2023, (10): 122−128.
40 王垒, 曲晶, 赵忠超, 等. 组织绩效期望差距与异质机构投资者行为选择: 双重委托代理视角[J]. 管理世界, 2020, (7): 132−152.
41 王小鲁, 胡李鹏, 樊纲. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2021)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2021.
42 王雪璐. 数字化转型对战略性新兴产业双元创新的影响: 基于“智能制造试点示范专项行动”的准自然实验[J]. 中国软科学, 2024, (11): 201−211. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2024.11.018
43 文强, 陈海强, 袁煜玲. 缓解融资约束必然促进企业创新吗?来自信贷扩张准实验的证据[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, (9): 2779−2794. DOI:10.12011/SETP2023-0816
48 席鹏辉, 李瑶. 战略性新兴产业发展与重点税源维护: 基于断点回归的证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2025, (2): 5−24.
49 谢德仁, 宋子威, 郑登津. 研发费用的表内单独列报有意义吗[J]. 会计研究, 2022, (8): 30−44. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2022.08.003
51 严兵, 程敏, 王乃合. ESG绿色溢出、供应链传导与企业绿色创新[J]. 经济研究, 2024, (7): 72−91.
52 杨墨竹. 证券市场机构投资者投资行为分析[J]. 金融研究, 2008, (8): 133−144.
53 杨兴全, 刘颖, 李枫. 政府引导基金与公司现金股利: 融资造血抑或创投驱动[J]. 经济管理, 2023, (12): 120−137.
55 周方召, 潘婉颖, 付辉. 上市公司ESG责任表现与机构投资者持股偏好——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科学决策, 2020, (11): 15−41.
56 周楷唐, 麻志明, 吴联生. 高管学术经历与公司债务融资成本[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (7): 169−183.
57 周铭山, 张倩倩, 杨丹. 创业板上市公司创新投入与市场表现: 基于公司内外部的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (11): 135−149.
58 周绍妮, 张秋生, 胡立新. 机构投资者持股能提升国企并购绩效吗?——兼论中国机构投资者的异质性[J]. 会计研究, 2017, (6): 67−74. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2017.06.011
59 Bhattacharya U, Daouk H, Welker M. The world price of earnings opacity[J]. The Accounting Review, 2003, 78(3): 641−678. DOI:10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.641
60 Brander J A, Du Q Q, Hellmann T. The effects of government-sponsored venture capital: International evidence[J]. Review of Finance, 2015, 19(2): 571−618. DOI:10.1093/rof/rfu009
61 Cheng Q, Du F, Wang B Y, et al. Do corporate site visits impact stock prices?[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2019, 36(1): 359−388. DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12417
62 Cheng Q, Du F, Wang X, et al. Seeing is believing: Analysts’ corporate site visits[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 2016, 21(4): 1245−1286. DOI:10.1007/s11142-016-9368-9
63 Cvijanović D, Dasgupta A, Zachariadis K E. Ties that bind: How business connections affect mutual fund activism[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2016, 71(6): 2933−2966. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12425
64 Drake M S, Roulstone D T, Thornock J R. Investor information demand: Evidence from Google searches around earnings announcements[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2012, 50(4): 1001−1040. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00443.x
65 Hirshleifer D, Hsu P H, Li D M. Innovative efficiency and stock returns[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 107(3): 632−654. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.09.011
66 Hirshleifer D, Teoh S H. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2003, 36(1-3): 337−386. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.002
67 Hsieh C T, Klenow P J. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(4): 1403−1448. DOI:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403
68 Keswani A, Stolin D. Which money is smart? Mutual fund buys and sells of individual and institutional investors[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2008, 63(1): 85−118. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01311.x
69 Leleux B, Surlemont B. Public versus private venture capital: Seeding or crowding out? A pan-European analysis[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2003, 18(1): 81−104. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00078-7
70 Lerner J. The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program[J]. The Journal of Business, 1999, 72(3): 285−318. DOI:10.1086/209616
71 Lerner J. The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital[J]. Small Business Economics, 2010, 35(3): 255−264. DOI:10.1007/s11187-010-9298-z
72 Marshall A, Rao S, Roy P P, et al. Mandatory corporate social responsibility and foreign institutional investor preferences[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2022, 76: 102261. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102261

数据公开

标题文件大小下载
2015-2023年A 股上市公司机构投资者持股稳定性 704.1 KB
2015-2023年A 股上市公司机制检验(鉴证信号效应、质量改善效应) 1.3 MB
2015-2023年A 股上市公司经济后果(股价崩盘风险、企业融资成本) 1.6 MB
2015-2023年A 股上市公司控制变量(企业规模、资产负债率、净资产收益率、第一大股东持股比例、独立董事比例、账面市值比、企业年龄、产权性质) 2.1 MB
2015-2023年A 股上市公司政府引导基金投资情况 456.6 KB
2015-2023年A 股上市公司政府引导基金投资情况的工具变量 611.3 KB
数据及程序代码 4.8 MB
图表 94.9 KB