人机协作是否必然提升劳动收入:来自网络招聘数据的证据

Does Human-Machine Collaboration Necessarily Increase Labor Income? Evidence from Online Recruitment Data

喻家驹,周健,陶长琪

2026 第 52 卷 第 07 期 页码 19-33

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20260516.301

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

语音预告

摘要

近年来,新一代信息技术被广泛用于社会生产各环节,对劳动收入产生了复杂而深远的影响,人机替代和人机协作是其中的两种形式。相比于人机替代,人机协作能够通过劳动工具升级的方式拓展劳动者能力边界,提升任务执行效率,在直观逻辑上更能为劳动收入的增长赋能。然而,从资本深化的角度来看,新一代信息技术的应用也必然弱化劳动者在生产中的角色,并降低劳动收入份额。加上缺少测算指标,目前尚不清楚人机协作是否必然提升劳动收入。文章采用网络招聘数据首次在就业岗位层面测算人机协作水平,并将其分解为教育依赖型协作和非教育依赖型协作,进而考察人机协作对劳动收入的影响。研究发现:人机协作总体上提高了劳动收入;“劳动生产率效应”和“劳动角色弱化效应”是其作用机制;人机协作并不必然提升劳动收入,由于“劳动生产率效应”和“劳动角色弱化效应”的影响程度不同,教育依赖型协作对劳动收入的提高具有促进作用,但非教育依赖型协作则有抑制作用;人机协作对劳动收入的影响存在年份、学历和区域异质性;拓展性分析显示,技能特异性强化人机协作对劳动收入的正向影响,且人机协作能显著提高就业岗位的权益保障水平。文章的研究结论对于优化人机协作方向和提高劳动收入份额提供了参考。

In recent years, the new generation of information technology has been widely used in all aspects of social production, and has exerted a complex and far-reaching impact on labor income. Human-machine substitution and human-machine collaboration are two forms of this. Compared with human-machine substitution, human-machine collaboration can expand the capability boundary of workers through the upgrading of labor tools, improve the efficiency of task execution, and more intuitively and logically empower the growth of labor income. However, from the perspective of capital deepening, the application of new-generation information technology will inevitably weaken the role of workers in production and reduce the share of labor income. Therefore, it is unclear whether human-machine collaboration will necessarily increase labor income.

This paper uses more than 19 million online recruitment data to measure human-machine collaboration at the job level, and explores its impact on labor income. The results show that human-machine collaboration generally promotes labor income through two mechanisms: One is to promote labor income through the “labor productivity effect”, and the other is to suppress labor income through the “weakening effect of labor role”. Human-machine collaboration does not necessarily increase labor income, while education-dependent collaboration promotes but non-education-dependent collaboration suppresses labor income. The impact of human-machine collaboration on labor income varies by year, education, and region. Skill specificity strengthens the positive impact of human-machine collaboration on labor income. Human-machine collaboration significantly improves the level of protection for the rights and interests of workers.

This paper makes the following marginal contributions: First, human-machine collaboration is measured at the job level for the first time by using online recruitment data, and the Gaussian mixture clustering method is innovatively introduced to decompose the human-machine collaboration into education-dependent collaboration and non-education-dependent collaboration. Second, it confirms the “labor productivity effect” and “weakening effect of labor role” of human-machine collaboration, and puts forward the view that human-machine collaboration does not necessarily increase labor income. Third, it finds the moderating effect of skill specificity in the impact of human-machine collaboration on labor income, and expands the consequences of human-machine collaboration from the perspective of employment quality.

参考文献

1 陈东, 郭文光. 数字化转型如何影响劳动技能溢价——基于A股上市公司数据的经验研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, (3): 173−192.
4 胡晟明, 王林辉, 赵贺. 人工智能应用、人机协作与劳动生产率[J]. 中国人口科学, 2021, (5): 48−62, 127.
13 孙早, 陈玉洁. 机器人角色、生产分割与生产方式转换[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (4): 5−23. DOI:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2023.04.004
20 张丹丹, 于航, 李力行, 等. 中国人工智能技术暴露度的测算及其对劳动需求的影响——基于大语言模型的新证据[J]. 管理世界, 2025, (7): 59−72.
21 Acemoglu D, Kong F, Restrepo P. Tasks at work: Comparative advantage, technology and labor demand[J]. Handbook of Labor Economics, 2025, 6: 1−114.
22 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2020, 128(6): 2188−2244. DOI:10.1086/705716
23 Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Tasks, automation, and the rise in U. S. wage inequality[J]. Econometrica, 2022, 90(5): 1973−2016. DOI:10.3982/ECTA19815
24 Ajoudani A, Zanchettin A M, Ivaldi S, et al. Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration[J]. Autonomous Robots, 2018, 42(5): 957−975. DOI:10.1007/s10514-017-9677-2
25 Autor D, Chin C, Salomons A, et al. New frontiers: The origins and content of new work, 1940–2018[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2024, 139(3): 1399−1465. DOI:10.1093/qje/qjae008
26 Autor D H, Levy F, Murnane R J. The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118(4): 1279−1333. DOI:10.1162/003355303322552801
27 Cleveland W S, Devlin S J. Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1988, 83(403): 596−610. DOI:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478639
28 Gao J, Li Z Z, Nguyen T, et al. Digital transformation and enterprise employment[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2025, 99: 104036.
29 Hentout A, Aouache M, Maoudj A, et al. Human–robot interaction in industrial collaborative robotics: A literature review of the decade 2008–2017[J]. Advanced Robotics, 2019, 33(15-16): 764−799. DOI:10.1080/01691864.2019.1636714
30 Jedwab R, Romer P, Islam A M, et al. Human capital accumulation at work: Estimates for the world and implications for development[J]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2023, 15(3): 191−223. DOI:10.1257/mac.20210002
31 Mukoyama T, Takayama N, Tanaka S. Occupational reallocation within and across firms: Implications for labor market polarization[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2025, 150: 103701. DOI:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2024.103701
32 Parker S K, Grote G. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world[J]. Applied Psychology, 2022, 71(4): 1171−1204. DOI:10.1111/apps.12241

数据公开

标题文件大小下载
拆解数据压缩包 466.5 GB
程序代码 2.3 KB
附表 383.1 KB
附录 262.1 KB