银行监管处罚与企业人力资本结构升级:来自新三板挂牌公司的证据

Bank Regulatory Penalties and the Upgrading of Corporate Human Capital Structure: Evidence from NEEQ-listed Companies

江毓群,熊家财,郭雪静

2026 第 28 卷 第 03 期 页码 106-121

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.03.008

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

人力资本作为创新驱动发展的关键生产要素,不仅是实现中国式现代化的核心支撑,也是践行党的二十届四中全会“投资于人”理念的关键抓手。文章使用2012—2023年新三板挂牌公司数据,分析银行受到的监管处罚对企业人力资本结构升级的影响及其作用机制。研究发现,银行受到的监管处罚有利于促进企业人力资本结构升级。机制分析表明,银行监管处罚能够通过提高企业信贷融资的可得性、引导企业增加固定资产投资和研发创新支出来促进企业人力资本结构升级。异质性分析表明,银行监管处罚对企业人力资本结构升级的促进作用在非国有企业、中小企业、高新技术企业、低信息透明度的企业以及金融发展水平较低的地区中更显著;轻度处罚以及与银行信贷行为相关的处罚对企业人力资本结构升级的促进作用更明显。经济后果分析表明,银行监管处罚引发的企业人力资本结构升级有助于提高企业全要素生产率和创新产出。研究结论为提升金融服务实体经济质效、推动经济高质量发展提供了经验证据。

Human capital, as a key production factor driving innovation-driven development, serves not only as a core pillar for achieving the Chinese path to modernization, but also as a critical lever for implementing the concept of “investing in people” outlined in the Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee. Based on administrative penalty information released by the National Financial Regulatory Administration, this paper systematically compiles all penalty records imposed on banking institutions from 2012 to 2023, matches the data on NEEQ-listed companies with the bank regulatory penalty data of cities where the companies are located, and constructs a city-level panel dataset of bank regulatory penalties. Using this dataset, this paper further examines the impact of bank regulatory penalties on the upgrading of corporate human capital structure, as well as the underlying mechanisms. The study finds that bank regulatory penalties significantly promote the upgrading of human capital structure. In China’s bank-dominated financial system, banks serve as the primary channel for firms to obtain external financing. On the one hand, regulatory penalties effectively correct bank lending behaviors by standardizing credit order, improving financing environments, and reducing financing costs, thereby enhancing firms’ access to credit. Adequate financial support, in turn, provides a direct guarantee for the upgrading of human capital structure. On the other hand, regulatory penalties also optimize the allocation of funds by guiding firms to increase investment in fixed assets and R&D innovation, which indirectly promotes the upgrading of human capital structure. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the above effects are more pronounced in non-SOEs, SMEs, high-tech firms, firms with lower information transparency, and regions with lower levels of financial development. In terms of penalty types, lighter penalties and penalties related to bank lending behaviors exhibit stronger effects in promoting the upgrading of human capital structure. Economic consequence analysis further indicates that the upgrading of human capital structure induced by bank regulatory penalties contributes to higher TFP and greater innovation output. This paper not only enriches the literature on bank regulatory penalties and corporate human capital investment, but also provides empirical evidence for enhancing the effectiveness of financial services to the real economy and promoting high-quality economic development.

参考文献

1 蔡庆丰, 吴奇艳, 吴冠琛. 地方隐性债务、银行风险感知与企业信贷可得性[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (1).
2 陈晔婷, 江志鳞. “漂绿”还是“真绿”: 银行监管处罚下的企业环保行为[J]. 财经论丛, 2025, (9).
6 郭红玉, 耿广杰. 央行抵押品框架的普惠效应——基于新三板小微企业的经验证据[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2022, (5). DOI:10.19681/j.cnki.jcufe.2022.05.001
9 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (5).
11 景鹏, 任成一, 寇纲. 社会保险降费与企业劳动力需求结构升级——来自上市公司网络招聘的经验证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, (8). DOI:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.0109
13 李玉山, 陆远权. 金融歧视、金融错配与技术创新[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2020, (4). DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20181253
18 吕勇斌, 郭懿晨, 李婧菲. 监管处罚如何影响银行财务绩效——兼论金融科技监管创新的调节效应[J]. 现代金融研究, 2025, (9). DOI:10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2025.09.007
19 马红旗. “资本—技能互补”对我国技能溢价的影响[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2016, (2). DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2016.02.006
21 明雷, 黄远标, 吴一凡. 监管处罚与银行高质量发展: 基于银行效率的视角[J]. 世界经济, 2025, (3). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9621.2025.3.sjjj202503007
23 聂丽, 汪玉龙, 满媛媛. 金融强监管与企业全要素生产率——基于资管新规的准自然实验[J]. 现代金融研究, 2025, (9).
25 彭玉镏, 杜小玲, 陈永良. 金融强监管与企业现金持有[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2025, (2).
26 饶品贵, 岳衡, 姜国华. 经济政策不确定性与企业投资行为研究[J]. 世界经济, 2017, (2).
32 王莹. 资本市场开放与企业人力资本结构升级——基于“沪港通”和“深港通”交易制度的准自然实验[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2022, (5).
36 徐玉德, 程东, 范亚辰. 筑巢引凤来: 数实融合与人力资本结构升级[J]. 财经论丛, 2024, (11).
41 赵静, 高雅琴. 金融行政处罚与银行风险——基于“双罚制”和处罚类型视角[J]. 财经研究, 2023, (2).
42 赵烁, 施新政, 陆瑶, 等. 兼并收购可以促进劳动力结构优化升级吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2020, (10).
44 朱喜安, 马樱格. 数字化转型如何推动企业人力资本结构升级[J]. 经济管理, 2024, (2).
45 Adrian T, Shin H S. Money, liquidity, and monetary policy [J]. American Economic Review, 2009, 99(2): 600–605. DOI:10.1257/aer.99.2.600
46 Barth J R, Lin C, Ma Y, et al. Do bank regulation, supervision and monitoring enhance or impede bank efficiency? [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, 37(8): 2879–2892.
47 Chava S, Oettl A, Subramanian A, et al. Banking deregulation and innovation [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 109(3): 759–774. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.03.015
48 Chen Y, Fan Z Y, Gu X M, et al. Arrival of young talent: The send-down movement and rural education in China [J]. American Economic Review, 2020, 110(11): 3393–3430. DOI:10.1257/aer.20191414
49 Danisewicz P, McGowan D, Onali E, et al. The real effects of banking supervision: Evidence from enforcement actions [J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2018, 35: 86–101. DOI:10.1016/j.jfi.2016.10.003
50 Delis M D, Staikouras P K, Tsoumas C. Formal enforcement actions and bank behavior [J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(4): 959–987. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2343
51 Delis M D, Staikouras P K, Tsoumas C. Supervisory enforcement actions and bank deposits [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2019, 106: 110–123.
52 Fonseca J, Van Doornik B. Financial development and labor market outcomes: Evidence from Brazil [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2022, 143(1): 550–568. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.06.009
53 Gropp R, Mosk T, Ongena S, et al. Banks response to higher capital requirements: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2019, 32(1): 266–299. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhy052
54 Hall B H, Lerner J. The financing of R&D and innovation [J]. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 2010, 1: 609–639.
55 Heckman J J. China’s human capital investment [J]. China Economic Review, 2005, 16(1): 50–70. DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2004.06.012
56 Onkelinx J, Manolova T S, Edelman L F. The human factor: Investments in employee human capital, productivity, and SME internationalization [J]. Journal of International Management, 2016, 22(4): 351–364. DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2016.05.002
57 Pang C J, Wang Y. Stock pledge, risk of losing control and corporate innovation [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2020, 60: 101534. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101534
58 Repullo R. Capital requirements, market power, and risk-taking in banking [J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2004, 13(2): 156–182. DOI:10.1016/j.jfi.2003.08.005
59 Schultz T W. Investment in human capital [J]. The American Economic Review, 1961, 51(1): 1–17.
60 Twesigye D, Patrick M. Performance of commercial banks in Rwanda [J]. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2020, 10(7): 855–859. DOI:10.29322/IJSRP.10.07.2020.p10396
61 Zhang S L, Wu Z H, He Y N, et al. How does the green credit policy affect the technological innovation of enterprises? Evidence from China [J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 113: 106236. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106236