法偿性存款:论数字人民币法律地位的再造

Deposit as Legal Tender: Re-establishment of the Legal Status of Digital Yuan

柯达

2026 第 28 卷 第 03 期 页码 137-152

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.03.010

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

新时期的数字人民币作为法律意义上的存款,满足“账户持有”与“本息待付”的形式要件,以及“货币创造”的实质要件。数字人民币用户作为存款人,与商业银行之间构成存款法律关系,用户的基础财产权利包括转移数字人民币至收款人的结算权,以及凭相同面额兑为其他货币形态的赎回权,二者均受存款准备金与存款保险制度的保障。新时期的数字人民币仍属国家发行的法定货币,具有法偿性,这一“法偿性存款”地位不仅可维护数字时代货币发行权的统一,还有助于明晰数字人民币在多层次货币体系中的定位。此外,该地位对存款保险与法偿效力的同时适用具有可行性。为保障数字人民币的法偿性存款地位,应在认可钱包限额、交易场景、收款条件等“使用权限”限制的前提下,重构数字人民币的法偿效力,并确立存款保险优先、法偿制度补充的危机救助顺序。同时,应构建以防范道德风险为导向的数字人民币监管职责配置,包括确立以央行为主、银行业监管机构协同的行政监管机制,建立由运营管理中心组织的自律管理体系,并要求参与数字人民币运营的商业银行履行监督义务。

As a deposit in the legal sense, Digital Yuan (e-CNY) in the new phase meets the formal requirements of “holding by account” and “payment with principal and interest”, as well as the substantive requirements of “monetary creation”, and therefore can be protected by the deposit reserve and deposit insurance system. As depositors, the users of Digital Yuan constitute a deposit legal relationship with commercial banks, and their basic property rights include the “settlement right” to request the transfer of Digital Yuan to the recipient, as well as the “redemption right” to exchange the same denomination for other monetary forms. This status of “deposit as legal tender” can not only maintain the unity of monetary power in the digital era, but also help clarify the positioning of Digital Yuan in the multi-level monetary system, and it is feasible in the compatibility of deposit insurance and the legal tender system. To further protect the legal status of Digital Yuan, firstly, the legal tender effect of Digital Yuan should be reconstructed on the premise of recognizing “access” restrictions, and the crisis relief order of priority for deposit insurance and supplementation by the legal tender system should be established; under the premise of satisfying the “access”, the legal tender effect of Digital Yuan is embodied in the effectiveness of administrative acceptance, civil repayment, and rescue in banking crises. Secondly, the legal means for the crisis relief of Digital Yuan operating institutions should be established. When the operating institutions face a repayment crisis, the law should stipulate that bank customers should be provided with rescue through deposit insurance first; if the deposit insurance cannot repay all the Digital Yuan of customers, bank customers may obtain the supplementary assistance through the legal tender system. Finally, the allocation of Digital Yuan regulatory responsibilities oriented to the prevention of moral hazard should be established. It includes the administrative supervision mechanism dominated by the central bank, the self-discipline management mechanism implemented by the operation management center, and the supervision obligations by commercial banks designated to participate in the operation of Digital Yuan.