构建中国住房保障自主知识体系:概念、理论与模式

Constructing an Indigenous Knowledge System for Housing Security in China: Concepts, Theories, and Models

乔贝,姚玲珍,张莉

2026 第 28 卷 第 04 期 页码 19-31

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.04.002

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

当前,我国已建成世界上规模最大的住房保障体系,并正以保障对象分层覆盖、多主体协同供给、配租与配售并行为特征加速推进。文章对中国特色住房保障实践进行经验总结和理论提炼,从标识性概念、理论内核以及实践模式三个层面探索中国住房保障自主知识体系的构建。在概念层面,强调我国住房保障的核心特征与术语标准;在理论层面,基于以人民为中心的共同富裕导向,构建公平与效率统一的双重属性分析框架以及生存、发展和共享递进统一的三重目标体系;在实践层面,坚持问题导向,聚焦供需匹配、财政可持续与治理现代化等现实议题,以期为我国住房保障模式的进一步完善提供理论指导,也为其他发展中国家的住房治理实践贡献中国方案。

China has established the world’s largest housing security system, characterized by stratified coverage of beneficiary groups, coordinated provision by multiple actors, and parallel implementation of rental-based and sale-based allocation mechanisms. Grounded in the institutional evolution and practical experience of China’s housing security system, this paper systematically reflects on the limitations of applying Western housing security frameworks within the Chinese context. It further proposes a strategy for constructing an indigenous knowledge system for housing security in China from the perspectives of concepts, theories, and models. At the conceptual level, this paper advocates a structurally grounded and hierarchically organized taxonomy. “Affordable housing” is defined as the overarching institutional category, within which two principal branches—rental-based and sale-based provisions—are distinguished. They are further specified into concrete subtypes, including public rental housing, government-subsidized rental housing, shared-ownership housing, and closed-management affordable housing. This paper also emphasizes the standardization of terminology and its capacity for cross-contextual dialogue. At the theoretical level, this paper advances a core framework summarized as “one center, dual attributes, and three objectives”. “One center” refers to a people-centered orientation toward common prosperity, clarifying the fundamental question of “housing security is provided for whom”. “Dual attributes” highlight the dialectical unity of equity and efficiency, addressing the central tension between social protection and economic development. “Three objectives” encompass a progression from ensuring basic shelter (subsistence goal), to achieving adequate and livable housing (development goal), and ultimately to promoting shared prosperity (collective goal). Together, these elements form an internally coherent explanatory logic for the housing security system. At the level of practical models, this paper adopts a problem-oriented approach and focuses on three pressing issues in China’s current housing security practice. First, supply-demand alignment, which involves resolving structural mismatches in beneficiary identification, spatial distribution, and policy instrument design. Second, fiscal sustainability, which calls for an analytical framework covering cost estimation, financing mechanisms, asset management, and risk monitoring, with a particular focus on innovative approaches such as converting existing housing stock into affordable housing. Third, governance modernization, which emphasizes the development of a multi-actor governance system through improvements in organizational structures, coordination mechanisms, and performance evaluation. This paper provides theoretical guidance for further improving China’s housing security models and offers a “Chinese solution” to housing governance challenges in other developing countries.

参考文献

1 陈杰. 让全体人民住有所居、居有所安[J]. 人民论坛, 2024, (5).
2 陈杰, 齐昕. 优化保障性住房供给的目标与推进思路[J]. 行政管理改革, 2025, (12). DOI:10.14150/j.cnki.1674-7453.2025.12.005
3 陈俊峰, 曾泉海. 福利体制理论视角下住房保障政策的国际比较及其启示[J]. 国际经济评论, 2025, (5).
4 李国敏, 陈政绩, 卢珂. 住有所居: 中国城市住房保障模式的价值目标[J]. 中国行政管理, 2024, (7). DOI:10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2024.07.08
5 李国庆, 钟庭军. 中国住房制度的历史演进与社会效应[J]. 社会学研究, 2022, (4).
6 马秀莲, 范翻. 住房福利模式的走向: 大众化还是剩余化?——基于40个大城市的实证研究[J]. 公共管理学报, 2020, (1).
7 潘浩之, 陈杰, 单峰. 实现住房保障与民生福祉协同增进的框架与思路——兼论“两多一并”住房新制度的优化路径[J]. 城市发展研究, 2024, (7). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2024.07.005
8 田莉. 我国住房保障体系的演进特征、发展逻辑与未来展望[J]. 社会保障评论, 2025, (5). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3211.2025.05.008
9 王诗勇, 刘丹丹, 孙伟增, 等. 从流动到安居: 住房保障制度与城乡融合发展——基于农民工群体城市融入视角[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2025, (2). DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2025.02.007
10 魏丽艳. 新时代租购并举住房保障制度的实施路径[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022, (5).
11 严荣. 西方国家住房保障政策思路的演进脉络[J]. 中国房地产, 2016, (6). DOI:10.13562/j.china.real.estate.2016.06.003
12 姚玲珍. 务工人员: 大城市经济复苏与房地产市场转型的重心[J]. 探索与争鸣, 2023, (4). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2229.2023.04.006
13 姚玲珍. 中国特色住房保障理论与实践[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2025.
14 姚玲珍, 乔贝. 习近平“精准扶贫”理念在配租型住房保障中的实践探索[J]. 海派经济学, 2024, (3).
15 赵春雨, 孙亚军, 丁茹栩. 行为空间视角下合肥市外来务工人员城市融入研究[J]. 人口与发展, 2022, (5).
16 朱斌, 卫天乐. “问题驱动”与“档案化”: 国家导向如何塑造中国社会科学的知识生产[J]. 社会科学, 2026, (1). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0257-5833.2026.01.017
17 Arbaci S. Ethnic segregation, housing systems and welfare regimes in Europe [J]. European Journal of Housing Policy, 2007, 7(4): 401–433. DOI:10.1080/14616710701650443
18 Blackwell T, Kohl S. Historicizing housing typologies: Beyond welfare state regimes and varieties of residential capitalism [J]. Housing Studies, 2019, 34(2): 298–318. DOI:10.1080/02673037.2018.1487037
19 Canelas P. Delivering affordable housing through public-private partnerships: Ambiguity, complexity and uncertain technology [J]. Habitat International, 2025, 164: 103517. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103517
20 Carnegie A, Norris M, Byrne M. Tenure mixing to combat public housing stigmatization: External benefits, internal challenges and contextual influences in three Dublin neighborhoods [J]. Cities, 2018, 79: 12–17. DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.017
21 Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
22 Freemark Y S. Politics in affordable housing provision: How partisan control of local councils influences planning choices [J]. Urban Studies, 2025, 62(5): 891–908. DOI:10.1177/00420980241267246
23 Gao X R, Hu W J. Making affordable rental housing unaffordable: Evaluating the impacts of the centralized leasing in Shenzhen, China [J]. Journal of Urban Management, 2025, 14(3): 927–939. DOI:10.1016/j.jum.2024.12.003
24 Harloe M. The people’s home? Social rented housing in Europe & America[M]. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell, 1995.
25 Hu W J, Lu D F. Educational opportunity and public rental housing choice of rural migrant families in Chongqing, China [J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2025, 47(5): 1620–1638. DOI:10.1080/07352166.2023.2237140
26 Kemeny J. Comparative housing and welfare: Theorising the relationship [J]. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2001, 16(1): 53–70. DOI:10.1023/A:1011526416064
27 Li Y, Xie Z H, Niu L. Does affordable housing supply exacerbate urban sprawl? Evidence from Chinese cities [J]. Habitat International, 2026, 168: 103674. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103674
28 Ma Z P, Li C G, Zhang J. Affordable housing brings about socio-spatial exclusion in Changchun, China: Explanation in various economic motivations of local governments [J]. Habitat International, 2018, 76: 40–47. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.003
29 Pennell G, Newman S, TarekeGne B, et al. A comparison of building system parameters between affordable and market-rate housing in New York City [J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 323: 119557. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119557
30 Sinai T, Waldfogel J. Do low-income housing subsidies increase the occupied housing stock? [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2005, 89(11-12): 2137–2164. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.015
31 Valença M M. Social rental housing in HK and the UK: Neoliberal policy divergence or the market in the making? [J]. Habitat International, 2015, 49: 107–114. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.017
32 Zheng S Q, Long F J, Fan C C, et al. Urban villages in China: A 2008 survey of migrant settlements in Beijing [J]. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2009, 50(4): 425–446. DOI:10.2747/1539-7216.50.4.425