数据安全监管与企业全要素生产率——来自《数据安全法》实施的经验证据

Data Security Regulation and Enterprise Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from the Implementation of the Data Security Law

马从文,湛泳

2026 第 28 卷 第 04 期 页码 74-88

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.04.006

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

《数据安全法》作为政府实施数据安全监管的重要法律保障,其核心目标是化解数据安全风险、护航经济高质量发展,但该法的实际监管成效,尤其是对企业全要素生产率的驱动效应尚未明晰。文章以《数据安全法》的实施作为准自然实验,利用沪深A股非金融上市公司数据,构建双重差分模型,实证检验《数据安全法》的实施对企业全要素生产率的驱动效应及其作用机制。研究结果表明,《数据安全法》的实施显著提高了企业全要素生产率。机制分析发现,《数据安全法》能够发挥数据安全治理效应,通过推动企业技术创新和优化人力资本结构提升了企业全要素生产率。进一步研究发现,对于国有企业、高科技企业、政策感知能力较强以及外部环境不确定性较低的企业,《数据安全法》的实施对其全要素生产率的驱动效应更为明显。文章不仅揭示了数据安全监管赋能企业全要素生产率的内在逻辑,而且为中国政府完善数据安全政策法规体系和实现高质量发展提供有益参考。

In the era of the digital economy, data elements have become an important engine to promote economic growth, but they also hide data security risks while releasing dividends. Data security governance is related to high-quality economic development, and it is difficult to effectively solve digital security problems only by relying on enterprises themselves. It is urgent for the government to strengthen data security regulation. The implementation of the Data Security Law marks that the data security regulation in China has entered the stage of the rule of law. Its core goal is to resolve data security risks and safeguard high-quality economic development. However, the actual regulatory effectiveness of this law, especially its driving effect on enterprise total factor productivity (TFP), has not been clearly studied.

This paper takes Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed enterprises as the research object, and uses the DID method to test the impact of the Data Security Law on enterprises TFP. The results show that the Data Security Law significantly improves enterprise TFP, and after a series of robustness tests, this conclusion remains valid. Mechanism testing reveals that the Data Security Law can give full play to the effect of data security governance, and improve enterprise TFP by promoting technological innovation and optimizing human capital structure. Heterogeneity analysis finds that the driving effect of the Data Security Law on enterprise TFP is heterogeneous due to enterprise characteristics and external environment constraints, as is manifested in state-owned enterprises, high-tech enterprises, enterprises with stronger policy perception capabilities, and enterprises facing lower external environment uncertainty. This paper not only helps to deepen the understanding of the impact of data security regulation on micro-enterprise behavior, but also provides a useful reference for the Chinese government to improve the data security policy and regulation system and achieve high-quality development.

参考文献

1 陈奉先, 杨亚迪. 数字并购对企业全要素生产率的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, (8). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2024.08.004
2 杜传忠, 薛宇择. 研发联盟、开放式创新与企业全要素生产率提升[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, (12).
3 范柏乃, 盛中华. 数字风险治理: 研究脉络、理论框架及未来展望[J]. 管理世界, 2024, (8). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.08.012
4 方明月, 聂辉华, 阮睿, 等. 企业数字化转型与经济政策不确定性感知[J]. 金融研究, 2023, (2). DOI:10.12404/j.issn.1002-980X.J24103114
5 胡俊宏, 仲瑞洋. 数据安全治理的经济法理念分析与制度构建[J]. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, (5). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0209.2024.05.013
6 江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (5). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2022.05.007
7 孔祥承. 数据安全监管制度构建的理论阐释与实践展开——以总体国家安全观为视角[J]. 青海社会科学, 2024, (4).
8 李娟, 杨晶晶, 赖明勇. 人才政策可以促进企业全要素生产率增长吗——基于地方政府人才治理视角的研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2022, (9).
9 李想. 数据处理者的数据安全保护义务及刑事责任[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, (5). DOI:10.19525/j.issn1008-407x.2025.05.008
10 连燕玲, 孙汉, 高皓. 危中寻机: 战略联盟对民营企业韧性的影响研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2025, (7).
11 刘艳红. 数据要素全生命周期安全风险的刑事保障制度研究——以数字经济安全法益观为视角[J]. 法学论坛, 2024, (1).
12 鲁晓东, 连玉君. 中国工业企业全要素生产率估计: 1999—2007[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2012, (2).
13 陆瑶, 施函青, 周欣怡. 中国企业数字技术风险暴露对企业价值的影响——来自大语言模型的文本分析证据[J]. 经济研究, 2025, (2).
14 马慧. 中小企业权益保护与创新活动[J]. 世界经济, 2024, (12). DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2024.12.006
15 彭远怀. 政府数据开放的价值创造作用: 企业全要素生产率视角[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, (9). DOI:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20230725.001
16 钱弘道, 康兰平, 申辉. 数字法治的基本原理和实践进路[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, (9).
17 沈坤荣, 乔刚, 林剑威. 智能制造政策与中国企业高质量发展[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, (2). DOI:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20231214.008
18 田利辉, 李政, 施炳展. 企业上云对其创新的影响: 数据要素化的视角[J]. 世界经济, 2025, (1). DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2025.01.007
19 王勇, 王鹏飞. 金融监管结构与制造业全要素生产率[J]. 世界经济研究, 2023, (8).
20 习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J]. 求知, 2024, (6).
21 谢地, 王荣基, 贺城. 数据要素市场化配置赋能企业新质生产力发展[J]. 经济学动态, 2025, (5).
22 徐长生, 崔美琪, 易鸣. 社保征管强度、劳动力成本冲击与企业智能化转型——来自《中华人民共和国社会保险法》实施的证据[J]. 经济学动态, 2025, (2).
23 余明桂, 石沛宁, 钟慧洁, 等. 垄断与企业创新——来自《反垄断法》实施的证据[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, (1).
24 张彪. 《数据安全法》语义模糊性的规制路径[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, (11).
25 张正平, 于新. 《数据安全法》对商业银行金融科技投入的影响研究[J]. 现代金融研究, 2025, (3). DOI:10.16529/j.cnki.11-4613/f.2025.03.001
26 Akcigit U, Pearce J, Prato M. Tapping into talent: Coupling education and innovation policies for economic growth [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2025, 92(2): 696–736. DOI:10.1093/restud/rdae047
27 Calzada I. Citizens’ data privacy in China: The state of the art of the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) [J]. Smart Cities, 2022, 5(3): 1129–1150. DOI:10.3390/smartcities5030057
28 Chen J H, Sun J B. Understanding the Chinese data security law [J]. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 2021, 2(2): 209–221. DOI:10.1365/s43439-021-00038-3
29 Gao L J, Chen Z Y, Zhao W, et al. Does cybersecurity regulation reduce corporate data-breach risk? [J]. Finance Research Letters, 2025, 78: 107171. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2025.107171
30 Hajli N, Shirazi F, Tajvidi M, et al. Towards an understanding of privacy management architecture in big data: An experimental research [J]. British Journal of Management, 2021, 32(2): 548–565. DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.12427
31 Levinsohn J, Petrin A. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2003, 70(2): 317–341. DOI:10.1111/1467-937X.00246
32 Lin B Q, Zhang A X. Impact of government subsidies on total factor productivity of energy storage enterprises under dual-carbon targets [J]. Energy Policy, 2024, 187: 114046. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114046
33 Mulgund P, Mulgund B P, Sharman R, et al. The implications of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) on healthcare organizations: Lessons learned from early compliance experiences [J]. Health Policy and Technology, 2021, 10(3): 100543. DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100543
34 Ren Y H, Zhang J, Wang X. How does data factor utilization stimulate corporate total factor productivity: A discussion of the productivity paradox [J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, 96: 103681. DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2024.103681
35 Rocha J F. Ethical implementation of AI in job candidate recruitment: Insights on data protection, artificial intelligence and legal perspectives [J]. Brazilian Journal of Law, Technology and Innovation, 2024, 2(1): 120–139. DOI:10.59224/bjlti.v2i1.120-139
36 Smirnova Y, Travieso-Morales V. Understanding challenges of GDPR implementation in business enterprises: A systematic literature review [J]. International Journal of Law and Management, 2024, 66(3): 326–344. DOI:10.1108/IJLMA-08-2023-0170
37 Song M L, Peng L C, Shang Y P, et al. Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 174: 121276. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121276
38 Song Z W. Personal data security and stock crash risk: Evidence from China’s cybersecurity law [J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2024, 17(4): 100393. DOI:10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100393
39 Wedel M, Kannan P K. Marketing analytics for data-rich environments [J]. Journal of Marketing, 2016, 80(6): 97–121. DOI:10.1509/jm.15.0413
40 Xu Y, Zhao F, Zhang Q. How does the cybersecurity law affect corporate investment [J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2025, 103: 104185. DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104185
41 Yu X C, Chen Y H. Does ESG advantage promote total factor productivity (TFP)? Empirical evidence from China’s listed enterprises [J]. Applied Economics, 2025, 57(24): 3202–3218. DOI:10.1080/00036846.2024.2336886
42 Yuan Z R, Yu Q Z. Shadow banking contraction and employment decisions in manufacturing firms: Empirical evidence from China's new asset management regulations [J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2025, 85: 131–149. DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2024.11.016